ok, inground pool too much $$$ how about above? (Austin, Center: real estate, lawyer)

[CptnRn]

Originally Posted by Mrs.JT

I apologize to everyone else for resurrecting this...

CptnRn, what you said is a jumble of non sequiturs. I believe in QUALITY, not QUANTITY. Who would want to replace a pool every three years? That's insane. (and a WASTE of money) Further, we wouldn't purchase a pool for the mere resale value of our home. If we install a pool, it would be for OUR pleasure. If it adds to the value of our home, great. If not, oh well. It's not that serious to me.

One indicator of QUALITY is good value for your money. No one said you would have to replace the pool every 3 years, that was an example of how economical they are. An average quality above ground pool would probably easily last for 15 years if reasonable care were taken of it. that is 15 years of pleasure at a pittance of the cost for a permanent pool. How can that possibly be a waste of money? What is a waste is spending 20 times more for the same amount of pleasure.

[Mrs.JT]

Originally Posted by CptnRn

One indicator of QUALITY is good value for your money. No one said you would have to replace the pool every 3 years, that was an example of how economical they are. An average quality above ground pool would probably easily last for 15 years if reasonable care were taken of it. that is 15 years of pleasure at a pittance of the cost for a permanent pool. How can that possibly be a waste of money? What is a waste is spending 20 times more for the same amount of pleasure.

I knew that would be the response - that you didn't say that the pool would have to be replace every three years. I understand that. But that was a poor example...you shouldn't have used it. My response to your hypothetical situation completely followed. I believe in quality over quantity. Your "example" mentioned replacing a pool numerous times...whether it was a practical example or not, you still said it. So that was my hypothetical answer to your hypothetical situation: Quality vs. Quantity.

Bottom line. We will spend our money the way WE see fit. It is not up to you to determine what is a waste of money for US. We would prefer an in ground pool because WE believe it would be of much better quality than an above ground pool for US. And again, we would not install a pool for the resale value of our home.

So let opinions be opinions, cause you can't change mine.

[HappyTexan]

Originally Posted by CptnRn

One indicator of QUALITY is good value for your money. No one said you would have to replace the pool every 3 years, that was an example of how economical they are. An average quality above ground pool would probably easily last for 15 years if reasonable care were taken of it. that is 15 years of pleasure at a pittance of the cost for a permanent pool. How can that possibly be a waste of money? What is a waste is spending 20 times more for the same amount of pleasure.

I can vouch for 10 years and 1 liner change in all that time.

[HappyTexan]

Originally Posted by Mrs.JT

I knew that would be the response - that you didn't say that the pool would have to be replace every three years. I understand that. But that was a poor example...you shouldn't have used it. My response to your hypothetical situation completely followed. I believe in quality over quantity. Your "example" mentioned replacing a pool numerous times...whether it was a practical example or not, you still said it. So that was my hypothetical answer to your hypothetical situation: Quality vs. Quantity.

Bottom line. We will spend our money the way WE see fit. It is not up to you to determine what is a waste of money for US. We would prefer an in ground pool because WE believe it would be of much better quality than an above ground pool for US. And again, we would not install a pool for the resale value of our home.

So let opinions be opinions, cause you can't change mine.

Well this thread is about above ground because the OP didn't want to spend the money on inground and was asking about above ground.

I don't think anyone is trying to convince you otherwise.

[Mrs.JT]

Originally Posted by HappyTexan

Well this thread is about above ground because the OP didn't want to spend the money on inground and was asking about above ground.

I don't think anyone is trying to convince you otherwise.

I understand what the thread is about. And my first response was just giving my input, which led to a reference to my post sounding "elitist." The OP ASKED for suggestions and input, and that's what I offered.

It didn't have to come to this, but it did. And my perception is that CptnRN was, indeed, trying to convince me of the quality, practicality and affordability of an above ground pool. Sure, the link he shared shed new light on above ground pools. And sure, they are a lot more affordable than in ground. But no thanks.

I merely suggested that if it's at all possible, maybe waiting a few years for an inground pool might be a solution. So I believe my input could be useful.

[CptnRn]

Originally Posted by oldtoiletsmkgdflrpots

Can anyone give input on above ground pools? Are they less expensive? Any suggestions?

Contrary to what some of the elitist posters have said on this thread, there is nothing wrong with installing an above ground swimming pool. You can save thousands of dollars doing so and have your family in the water enjoying the pool in a very short period of time for a fraction of the cost, while the others are still saving their money towards a down payment years from now. Your kids will be enjoying hours of recreation in the pool while the other family who is waiting and saving their money watches their kids grow up without one. And you will have additional money in the bank that you can save towards your kids college and your retirement fund.

A properly installed and maintained above ground pool will give you years of enjoyment for a fraction of the cost of an in ground pool.

[Mrs.JT]

Thank you, CptnRn. That was a response which addressed the OP's original questions.

But still LOL @ "elitist posters."

[HappyTexan]

My pool was a Doughboy with resin sides. It was oval but did not have those braces sticking out on the side.

That pool saw plenty of kids splashing around and pushing off the sides (until I yelled).
The biggest thing to stress to the kids is no jumping into the pool and no diving. No ifs, ands or buts.

At this time of year the installers might be pretty busy

[kbchitown]

Moderator cut: off topic/personal

As far as pools go...it's an individual choice. Also consider the location for any pool. An above ground can look like an oil storage unit on a small property...and then there's the lack of privacy issue....it's all about what YOU want and can afford. But, let's face it...above ground = cheaper than in ground, in actual cost, but also in perception.

[Austin97]

Originally Posted by CptnRn

Contrary to what some of the elitist posters have said on this thread, there is nothing wrong with installing an above ground swimming pool. You can save thousands of dollars doing so and have your family in the water enjoying the pool in a very short period of time for a fraction of the cost, while the others are still saving their money towards a down payment years from now. Your kids will be enjoying hours of recreation in the pool while the other family who is waiting and saving their money watches their kids grow up without one. And you will have additional money in the bank that you can save towards your kids college and your retirement fund.

A properly installed and maintained above ground pool will give you years of enjoyment for a fraction of the cost of an in ground pool.

unless your enjoyment is predicated on being elitist..

If you cant enjoy an above ground pool because it offends you, then that is truly elitist. Dont worry about being elitist, but at least admit it.

I personally would love an above ground pool, but my wife is an elitist.