Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-05-2012, 05:40 AM
 
Location: Austin, TX
1,825 posts, read 2,828,191 times
Reputation: 1627

Advertisements

Quote:
My company has unlimited vacation time from day one. Yes, unlimited, within reason.
This is a newer policy that some businesses are trying (mine included). It's "unlimited" like AT&T is "unlimited." The idea is that you're not setting an arbitrary number, you're incentivizing your employees to work hard when they're here and thus be able to take time off when they need/want to and to use plain old good judgment in determining when enough is enough.

It sounds good on paper but all it takes is one bad apple either on the HR side or the employee side. Probably works better in an at-will state like TX. I'm interested in doing something like this but I'd still be careful about calling it "unlimited." It's just "limited by your workload and output and not limited by a fixed number of days."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-05-2012, 07:46 AM
 
247 posts, read 558,838 times
Reputation: 91
Quote:
Originally Posted by cBach View Post
My company has unlimited vacation time from day one. Yes, unlimited, within reason.
Unlimited I feel like is actually bad since usually you're more busy at work and it's hard to break away without feeling guilty for the rest of the team, etc. But if you're at a company that actually lets you have a good work/life/vacation balance, that's great!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2012, 07:51 AM
 
Location: Volcano
12,969 posts, read 28,439,744 times
Reputation: 10759
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquitaine View Post
This is a newer policy that some businesses are trying (mine included).
IBM has had that policy for years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2012, 07:56 AM
 
247 posts, read 558,838 times
Reputation: 91
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trainwreck20 View Post
My wife's company is similar, I guess, but she gets NO holidays, but like 6 weeks of vacation/personal leave (maybe more?). Anyway, all of her time off is in one big pot. She works for a very large company and time-off benefits tend to be better there anyway.

I am guess your situation is relatively rare, though, when compared with most jobs .
I got lucky with my company. We don't have separate sick leave but we do get I think 10 days of holidays which is another 2 weeks
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2012, 08:35 AM
 
Location: Round Rock, TX
1,317 posts, read 4,057,863 times
Reputation: 766
Where I work, you get one week after a year and two weeks after two. But you don't get the whole week after the year - you get increments of time on each pay period. I guess that all saves the company money if you get let go - so they don't have to pay you for extra time not used.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2012, 09:17 AM
 
Location: Austin, TX
1,825 posts, read 2,828,191 times
Reputation: 1627
Quote:
IBM has had that policy for years.
Netflix made the WSJ front page when they implemented it and it was touted as new. I'll cop to ignorance of IBM's vacation policy if the WSJ will.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2012, 09:28 AM
 
Location: Austin, TX
15,269 posts, read 35,637,527 times
Reputation: 8617
What is nice about my wife's is that they do not want you to claim partial days for time off - if you go to the Dr. or go run and errand, do not count it as vacation. Ofc, in her work she easily makes up that time (salary position) anyway, so it is not really a 'give me', but I work on billable hours, so any time I take off pretty much has to be accounted for.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2012, 10:34 AM
 
Location: Volcano
12,969 posts, read 28,439,744 times
Reputation: 10759
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquitaine View Post
Netflix made the WSJ front page when they implemented it and it was touted as new. I'll cop to ignorance of IBM's vacation policy if the WSJ will.
I guess WSJ doesn't read FastCompany or Time or any of the other publications which mentioned IBM in their articles about the new Netflix policy.

Here's what CNN Money said... "But this isn't merely a flash fad for startups. IBM (IBM, Fortune 500) is said to have had flexible vacation time for every employee since 2003. People who work for the company simply give their supervisors a heads up, but otherwise, take time off when they want it. And Best Buy (BBY, Fortune 500) has a similar policy involving its workdays: Instead of tracking the hours employees work, the electronics company has implemented what it calls a "results only work environment," where workers are measured on achievement alone."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2012, 01:00 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
12,059 posts, read 13,890,870 times
Reputation: 7257
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquitaine View Post
Netflix made the WSJ front page when they implemented it and it was touted as new. I'll cop to ignorance of IBM's vacation policy if the WSJ will.
The policy is actually smarter financially for a company than the accrual method. In the old method, vacation days accumulated, being treated as a liability to the company, as if you were laid off, they had to pay you the accumulated time not taken.

With the new policy, there is no accrual, thus no liability. So when layoffs occur, there is no payout which is cheaper for the company to "right" size. The company can lock down during busy times and relax during quiet times. For instance, I had to take time off during those fires in Steiner last year. It was unscheduled and if I was at another company, I would have had to use vacation days for that. But with this method, nothing was lost. I took a few extra days off, I got my stuff in order, and the company never had to accrue any liability.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2012, 01:21 PM
 
Location: Pflugerville
2,211 posts, read 4,850,343 times
Reputation: 2242
Quote:
Originally Posted by crashoran View Post
I've been offered a job, but they will not allow ANY vacation during the first year. After 1 year of employment I'm eligible to use 2 weeks. I've already been working with them for 3 months through a temp agency, and they want me to come on full time.

Asking me to go 15 months straight without any time off is unreasonable, do you agree? I don't know if I should dump this and begin my job search somewhere else, because this is ridiculous. They did tell me I could take unpaid days, but that kind of defeats the purpose of taking a vacation..
As a temp, you knew you did not qualify for benefits/vacation time...so I wouldn't really count those 3 months into the 15. There was no expectation of time off.

As a temp that they are now offering full time work too, you should count your lucky stars........I have several temps working under me that would love that opportunity. Not every temp gets hired on.

In this economy, I wouldn't throw any job away. You can take time off if you want, you just don't get paid. You are not being treated differently from any other employee.....I just don't see the problem. A year is not that long to go without vacation.

But if you want to quit and try to find another job, go for it. Some other temp will get your job and be grateful. Shrug.

It's really a personal choice you have to make. We don't live inside your head. Either you can live with 15 months of working, or you can't. Even if everyone on this board said "That's highway robbery!" your company isn't going to change their policy. You have to decided if YOU can live with it...we can't help you with that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:18 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top