Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-19-2013, 08:51 AM
 
Location: Austin, TX
522 posts, read 656,559 times
Reputation: 244

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trainwreck20 View Post
Back some years ago, a plan was proposed that would add a lane for a couple of miles on S. Mopac (near Wm Cannon) and make all the lanes toll because it was 'new'. I think they had one or two other places this was floated for a bit, but all were pretty much shot down due to the furor it created. I am not talking about the toll lane currently proposed on MoPac.
OK, well that's different. I get you now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-19-2013, 08:59 AM
 
Location: Austin, TX
522 posts, read 656,559 times
Reputation: 244
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScoPro View Post
But TXDOT is getting lazy with this nutty business of adding toll lanes to existing highways, when our tax money should be used for added free lanes.

Like the Federal government, the State of Texas diverts about 35% of the gas tax revenue to non-road projects & the general fund. That's one reason our highway expansion & infrastructure maintenance has been suffering for years.
Well, you're of course correct. But that's just one, relatively minor part of the problem. The larger issue is the failure of fuel tax revenue to keep up with inflation (because it's an absolute number, and not expressed as a percentage, as are traditional sales taxes). As the price of everything goes up (and more asphalt is incrementally added), costs go up with no corresponding (or at least proportional) rise in tax revenue. Add in marginal increases in vehicle fuel efficiency, and you have a true unsustainable long-term disaster on your hands. Even if the diverted funds were dedicated solely to highways, that's a short-term solution. Lack of indexing to inflation, better mileage standards, gradual adoption of alternative power sources will eat that up sooner rather than later if we build tons of "free" lanes (which of course, are never "free" - fuel taxes and vehicle registrations, etc. only cover about 50% of the total cost of "free" roads). "Free" lanes have to be maintained just like tolled lanes. The more you add, the more you add to your bills.

The analogy I like to use is that of a homeowner who is paying all of the traditional home-related expenses - debt, utilities, and so forth - and is contemplating adding a new addition to the home in 2013, but with a paycheck that's indexed to 1992 cost of living. It's just unsustainable (and I don't mean that in the touchy-feely, environmental way).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2013, 09:07 AM
 
7,742 posts, read 15,095,113 times
Reputation: 4295
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScoPro View Post
I agree with that.

SH45 & 130 have been a huge convenience for us - even though we only use them maybe 2 or 3 times a week.

But TXDOT is getting lazy with this nutty business of adding toll lanes to existing highways, when our tax money should be used for added free lanes.

Like the Federal government, the State of Texas diverts about 35% of the gas tax revenue to non-road projects & the general fund. That's one reason our highway expansion & infrastructure maintenance has been suffering for years.
I agree with this. Im in favor of toll roads, but we are also paying gas taxes. The areas that scream the loudest get the lions share of gas taxes (I have no idea if it is us or not). We should get our proper share of the gas taxes and then I would be fine to use toll roads for the rest.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2013, 09:11 AM
 
Location: Rural Central Texas
3,672 posts, read 10,588,562 times
Reputation: 5577
Quote:
Originally Posted by Austin97 View Post
I like toll roads and am ok with turning existing roads into toll roads.
I think you meant to type TROLL roads. Right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2013, 09:38 AM
 
3,836 posts, read 5,750,717 times
Reputation: 2556
Roads continue to incur costs long after they are built. The older the road the hire the cost to maintain. I'm in favor of tolling all roads anyways - user pays. No problem with converting older roads to be tolled.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2013, 01:48 PM
 
1,063 posts, read 1,774,378 times
Reputation: 632
U would...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2013, 03:09 PM
 
625 posts, read 1,132,274 times
Reputation: 250
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gorfml View Post
U would...
They are...

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2013, 04:07 PM
 
3,836 posts, read 5,750,717 times
Reputation: 2556
I do. . .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2013, 08:23 PM
 
Location: Plano, TX
770 posts, read 1,793,861 times
Reputation: 718
Quote:
Originally Posted by Komeht View Post
Roads continue to incur costs long after they are built. The older the road the hire the cost to maintain. I'm in favor of tolling all roads anyways - user pays. No problem with converting older roads to be tolled.
Oh really?? well too bad that the vast majority of Texans and motorist throughout the country don't think like you. It is criminal to impose tolls on limited access routes that are already free and paid for. If you don't think so then there must be something really wrong with you.

If all roads were tolled, the cost of goods in all types of stores would be significantly higher. You must be one of those rich people who doesn't care about anyone but themselves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2013, 08:27 PM
 
Location: Plano, TX
770 posts, read 1,793,861 times
Reputation: 718
Quote:
Originally Posted by Komeht View Post
Roads continue to incur costs long after they are built. The older the road the hire the cost to maintain. I'm in favor of tolling all roads anyways - user pays. No problem with converting older roads to be tolled.
Yeah, but imposing a toll on existing roads is criminal. The state legislature and the corrupt TXDOT should never be diverting funds away from the transportation department in the first place. In a state as big as Texas, transportation infrastructure should be a top priority, not the fattining of pockets of bureaucrats in Austin and at TXDOT. Toll roads, at least in Texas, are nothing but an example of corruption by state officials.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top