U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-16-2008, 09:36 PM
 
56 posts, read 165,558 times
Reputation: 22
Default La Ventana resolves water dispute

I heard La Ventana resolved water dispute with developers yesterday
is it not one of the best areas in the SW of Austin to buy?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-16-2008, 09:50 PM
 
Location: South Austin (Circle C)
260 posts, read 873,741 times
Reputation: 55
In my opinion, it is an exceptional area. I do business there and plan on moving there in the future or building there on my own lot. Typical days on market there is long though, but the most expensive home there just went pending this month. Great views, great lots, great topography. I think the one thing that scares people off is it's greatest asset. It seems very rural, yet its distance to downtown probably has the lowest population density for places the same distance out. Basically it seems farther out than it is and has a very easy commute. La Ventanna to Circle C takes about 10 to 12 minutes and never has congestion. Once you get on 45 (which turns into Mopac) it's a straight shot to downtown and during peak rush hour you won't hit a backup until Barton Skyway. On the return, traffic eases up at 360 and your looking 15 to 20 minutes to La Ventanna from there. Definitly a desireable area once you realize it is not that far out and how easy the commute is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2008, 05:40 AM
 
Location: Driftwood TX
390 posts, read 1,001,235 times
Reputation: 119
Did ya hafta go and tell everybody!!!
Seriously, you are right on the money , 15 minuits of nice country drive, is well worth the privacy, and peace, not to mention the lack of roof-hopper developements.. often times we'll snag some Salt Lick take out on the way home!
Seriously biased here,
Cheers


Quote:
Originally Posted by Derek ATX View Post
In my opinion, it is an exceptional area. I do business there and plan on moving there in the future or building there on my own lot. Typical days on market there is long though, but the most expensive home there just went pending this month. Great views, great lots, great topography. I think the one thing that scares people off is it's greatest asset. It seems very rural, yet its distance to downtown probably has the lowest population density for places the same distance out. Basically it seems farther out than it is and has a very easy commute. La Ventanna to Circle C takes about 10 to 12 minutes and never has congestion. Once you get on 45 (which turns into Mopac) it's a straight shot to downtown and during peak rush hour you won't hit a backup until Barton Skyway. On the return, traffic eases up at 360 and your looking 15 to 20 minutes to La Ventanna from there. Definitly a desireable area once you realize it is not that far out and how easy the commute is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2008, 05:01 PM
 
1,158 posts, read 1,246,640 times
Reputation: 1103
Default La Ventana - water issue isn't the only problem

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Williams 9 View Post
I heard La Ventana resolved water dispute with developers yesterday
is it not one of the best areas in the SW of Austin to buy?
That dispute ("water company lawsuit") was between the past and current developers. There is another lawsuit ("variance lawsuit"), however, between a number of residents and the declarant-controlled ROA ("Ranch Owners Association").

The water company lawsuit only determined ownership as between successive developers and not with respect to others. In addition, the declarant must obtain approval from TCEQ before the transfer is legit.

The water company lawsuit has no impact on the variance lawsuit, but the position taken by the ROA and the outcome of the variance lawsuit should concern you. The declarant would like to ensure that everyone in this subdivision is held captive to their water company in order to maximize the value the declarant can get by flipping the water company. The declarant controls the Board of the ROA.

Here's a list of "must have" issues that the La Ventana ROA Board must address to ensure that it is a great place for the residents and not just the Board members and vendors who for the most part do not even live here:

1) honoring the deal that mandatory members made when purchasing here
2) open elections
3) open meetings
4) open records
5) open voting
6) dumping Alliance Association Management

1): The recorded CCRs identify the restrictions applying to the properties in La Ventana. Unfortunately, the Board members have engaged in conduct to try to effectively create more restrictions that no one agreed to. Through manipulation of the Architectural Committee, the Board members are trying to force members to use vendors with which the Board members own or have self-serving financial arrangements with. The Board members operate primarily to protect the interests of the Board members - not the residents.

There is no restrictive covenant requiring residents to purchase all or any gas from the "central gas system". Similarly, there is no restrictive covenant requiring residents to purchase all of their water from the declarant-owned water company. Nonetheless, the Board wants to tie your lot purchase to the mandated purchase of water and propane from vendors they own or have self-serving financial interests in. The Board has attempted to achieve this in part through a campaign of threats, intimidation, and defamatory proclamations for more than a year.

A number of residents sought and obtained approvals from the Architectural Committee which give permission from the ROA to install a residential well and/or buried propane tank. Residents still need the approval of other regulatory authorities, but these approvals were required to avoid the threat of being fined and foreclosed upon. Despite having followed every requirement in the CCRs and despite the fact that such approval is the "sole and absolute discretion" of the Architectural Committee members (who were previously elected from among the residents and are now appointed by the Board members), the La Ventana Board members refuse to honor the agreement residents made when purchasing lots here.

It's bad enough to have to beg for approvals from an Architectural Committee as if you want to destroy your investment out here. It's worse that even after you have subjected yourself and obtained the requisite approval that the ROA would then ignore the restrictions that apply to IT and engage in such conduct.

Heck, the CCRs for "the Preserve" expressly permit buried propane tanks, upon written authorization from the Architectural Committee. Don't believe it! There would not be a lawsuit today if the Board intended to honor the representations in the CCRs. That is an illusory representation.

The Board will conduct themselves to restrain trade for the benefit of the Board members and their affiliated vendors - NOT the homeowners who live here. The currency of trade for the declarant Board members is money. The currency of trade for the homeowner Board members is at least ego and control and perhaps more.

A number of residents got fed up with these Board members and filed a petition for declaratory judgment in Hays County. Discontent with allowing the court to decide the matter, the Board has engaged in a litany of tactics to try to prevent this case from seeing the light of day in the courtroom. A motion for sanctions has been filed against the ROA attorney for his unethical conduct. The next hearing in the case is March 2008.

For the past year, the Board and the president have engaged in a variety of tactics to disenfranchise and marginalize numerous residents in the subdivision. The Board intimidated numerous residents into yielding by filing lis pendens on the properties of these homeowners and threatening them with legal fees.

Be aware that the attorney for the ROA has taken the position that the ROA Board can revoke approvals as it choses after granting them regardless of the investment you made in reliance upon representations of the CCRs or the authorized Architectural Committee. There is no authority for that oppressive position in the CCRs, but yet again the ROA Board continues to expand its "authority". You might think about that before plopping down $500K-$1.3 million and living in that environment. This is but one reason that the outcome of the variance lawsuit should be important to ALL homeowners.

Of course, if you are primarily investing there are a lot of properties that may be had for far less than the owners paid for them at this time.

2-5). Open meetings, records, voting, elections
Due to the nature of the mandatory (i.e., involuntary) membership in the ROA you subject yourself to "rule by ROA". Unfortunately, you realize the importance of these things when the Board gets out of control.

You might want to look at the La Ventana Bylaws recorded by Board members.

Last year's "election" only permitted named homeowners to "serve". These named homeowners made numerous representations in support of their "deal" which was coupled with requiring the rest of the subdivision to pony up $600 per member. Members who stated that they cast their ballot in reliance upon the truthfulness of the statements made by these "candidates" had their ballots invalidated.

The Bylaws were then amended by the Board members to make sure that directors and officers have to be "qualified" by these homeowner Board members. They actually NAMED THEMSELVES in the Bylaws. We can only speculate as to why these homeowner Board members view themselves as superior to the rest of the members or exactly what the "qualifications" are.

The declarant controls the total vote, but you can see that these ego-challenged homeowners couldn't resist creating their own fiefdom with respect to the other homeowners who are now reduced to mandatory "funders".

This last "election", residents were not permitted to cast ballots, but rather were only permitted to give a proxy to an agent of the Board. Of course, there is no authority for the Board to mandate proxies, but that didn't stop the current homeowner Board members from doing just that.

Not surprisingly, the incumbents approved of their own qualifications and all "qualified nominees" were unopposed.

These Board members also established a "Finance Committee" and staffed it with their comrades to the express exclusion of all other members of the ROA via Bylaw amendment.

The management company advertises that Board meetings are open to the public. In fact, Board meetings are not even open to other residents of La Ventana. These Finance Committee meetings are also closed to all other members.

6) The subdivision is "managed" by Alliance Association Management - which most homeowners would probably like to dump. Alliance is one of Texas Sen. Carona's management companies and he consistently promulgates legislation to make more money for his management companies at HOA resident's expense.

Carona's organization usually moves in and tries to switch out a number of HOA vendor contracts to use, for example, his insurance and banking affiliates among other vendors. They also convince Boards to adopt a private "fining" policy and a "priority of payment" resolution. The priority of payment resolution re-characterizes your assessment payments to be applied to fines, management company fees, etc. The management company then roams the neighborhood proclaiming residents to be in violation of various CCR provisions. No court, no appeal. In this manner, the management company threatens homeowners with the loss of their home in order to extract monies. La Ventana residents discovered this scam early on and put an end to it in this subdivision. However, be very, very wary of ANY other subdivision managed by Alliance Association Management because you will almost certainly find this extortive provision.

Forgive the pun, but there is usually an unholy alliance between Alliance and Board members wherever Alliance operates. Board members and members of the Finance Committee are inherently immune from Alliance, but the rest of the subdivision is open season. When examining those Bylaws, you might note that the Board members granted Alliance a monopoly on being the management company for the subdivision.


When the La Ventana ROA Board corrects the listed items above, then it will be habitable for people other than Board members (only one of which lives here). Are the above really too much too ask for, or minimum expectations of individuals compelled to fund a mandatory HOA?

Last time I looked, the Bylaws were not provided at the webiste maintained by the marketing company. The restrictions posted by the marketing company are not the restrictions currently applicable.

On lots purchased from the declarant, there will be a "release from declarant" transfer fee, propane tap fee, and water tap fee. You won't have any of these fees for existing homes.

Only about 13 homes presently have granted approvals that assure independence from the Board's preferred vendors. Although anyone can request an approval, the lawsuit and the Board's tactics make it pretty clear that the Board will act to prevent anyone else from having alternatives to vendors with which those controlling the Board have self-serving financial arrangements with despite the representations in the CCRs. If you are looking for resale homes, you might want to think about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2008, 05:21 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
71,042 posts, read 31,417,160 times
Reputation: 16544
all I can say is WOW..just WOW..your worst HOA nightmare (although you call it ROA)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2008, 06:04 PM
 
Location: The Miami Of Canada
1,044 posts, read 2,476,400 times
Reputation: 273
Quote:
Originally Posted by IC_deLight View Post
Carona's organization usually moves in and tries to switch out a number of HOA vendor contracts to use, for example, his insurance and banking affiliates among other vendors. They also convince Boards to adopt a private "fining" policy and a "priority of payment" resolution. The priority of payment resolution re-characterizes your assessment payments to be applied to fines, management company fees, etc. The management company then roams the neighborhood proclaiming residents to be in violation of various CCR provisions. No court, no appeal. In this manner, the management company threatens homeowners with the loss of their home in order to extract monies. La Ventana residents discovered this scam early on and put an end to it in this subdivision. However, be very, very wary of ANY other subdivision managed by Alliance Association Management because you will almost certainly find this extortive provision.
Thank you for poining that out! Absolutely horrible, imho.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2008, 06:51 PM
 
1,158 posts, read 1,246,640 times
Reputation: 1103
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
all I can say is WOW..just WOW..your worst HOA nightmare (although you call it ROA)
The declarant set it up as a "Ranch Owners Association" - ROA. This was just a marketing gimmick. It's the same as a property owners association (POA) or homeowners association (HOA).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2008, 04:31 PM
 
18 posts, read 46,952 times
Reputation: 16
Default Do you have kids?

We were interested in a home in La Ventana which has been on the market and empty for over 500 days! Roughly 30+ are on the market and only a few sold for under a 140 per foot last year. Far less than current asking price of $160 PF or more.

The more we looked into the lawsuits, lack of water and the other options available in areas with LCRA water and NG or personal Propane tanks - we PAUSED.

The other huge issue is the distance to the schools. 1 hour or more bus ride, 20 or so minutes by car. The neighborhood falls at the apex of 3 different school districts. Only 1 street (nicholas) goes to desirable Dripping Springs Schools. All the others go to HAYS and the new section will eventually go to Wemberley!

If you have health issues or desire fire protection, look elsewhere. No fire hydrants for the volunteers whose station is miles away. Paramedics? not sure. Trauma center is outside the golden hour by my estimation. Nearest hospital is 20 minutes and not a trauma center.

Taxes are high for NO public services and it will be years before shopping and gas are nearby. (don't drive home on empty).

We still like the area, but nearby neighborhoods like Panther Creek and many other don't have half the issues.

Water is a concern for every neighborhood in the area as more wells will only drain the aquifer faster, Rainwater collection is the only answer, yet no one has implemented it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2008, 06:52 PM
 
Location: South Austin (Circle C)
260 posts, read 873,741 times
Reputation: 55
Leif, You are right on just about all accounts. I do want to shed some light on the fire protection and EMS situation though. I am a member of the department that protects La Ventana and yes there are no hydrants there which is the case in most of this part of the county. Because of this all of the local fire departments have multiple tanker trucks that shuttle water to portable tanks that are set up next to the fire truck to pump from. We have yet to run out of water with this system and usually the tanker trucks are backed up because the pumpers can't pump it faster than we can shuttle it to tthe scene. It sounds odd to some people but it is actually a very effective system. There actually is one hydrant in LaVentana. It's what's called a "dry" hydrant. You can see it as a red pipe coming from out of the ground near the main gates. This pipe runs into the pond there and we use it to draft water from. Because there are no hydrants though, you will pay higher insurance premiums. As for EMS, it's about a 7 min. ride from La Ventana to SSW in an ambulance. There is only on trauma center in the area and that is Brackenridge. If you have a serious injury you will more than likely be flown out even if you live as close, (or far depending on how you look at it) as Circle C.


Derek
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-06-2008, 07:56 PM
 
324 posts, read 864,765 times
Reputation: 102
but ems are volunteers as well? (i realize they are likely qualified but response time and experience is of utmost importance in an emergent situation)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Options
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2011 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $79,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2014, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 - Top