Quote:
Originally Posted by llkltk
Yes, they are looking for a good price. It was just a weird situation to have to present them with the offer as opposed to them coming to us with a price. You are right markstrub. There will be no broker fees at all. Just closing. Probably if we put it on the market we would have to pay 3% to a buyer's agent if someone had one. That's the motivation, to not have to pay a buyer's agent since they don't have one.
|
As a general rule, I would never "offer" a buyer a price. I'd make them bring a price to the table and start there. I would however let them know what your list price is going to be when you list it.
If you are not careful, you're about to get led around by the nose by someone who won't actually by your house. Seen it a hundred times. Sellers essentially let some uncommitted buyer control the property and the process with based only on the hope they will buy.
Also, who would you rather pay to run the other side of the deal, an experienced agent or an unrepresented buyer? You are essentially hiring the unrepresented buyer to run the other side of the deal and paying them the full commission. What qualifies them for that position and is it in your best interests?
For example, a buyer called my wife (also a Realtor) this weekend on one of our listings. The buyer wanted to write an offer and keep the buyer commission. Sylvia said "no, you need to have an agent. The buyer agent fee is built in and we don't rebate it if you are acting without an agent".
The buyer did get an agent and did write an offer yesterday. Our seller is much better protected having an agent on the other side of the deal, the process is much more predictable, and we avoid doing the missing agent's job without compensation.
Steve