Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-22-2022, 07:23 PM
 
Location: Fortbend County
164 posts, read 364,292 times
Reputation: 82

Advertisements

Buyers can borrow 5 year ARM that the rate is much lower than 30 year fixed rate. They can always do zero cost refinance later when the rate is lower.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-22-2022, 07:50 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX via San Antonio, TX
9,848 posts, read 13,687,247 times
Reputation: 5702
Quote:
Originally Posted by va_residents View Post
Buyers can borrow 5 year ARM that the rate is much lower than 30 year fixed rate. They can always do zero cost refinance later when the rate is lower.
Because that didn’t cause the Great Recession about 15 years ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-22-2022, 11:50 PM
 
10,130 posts, read 19,872,387 times
Reputation: 5815
Quote:
Originally Posted by va_residents View Post
Buyers can borrow 5 year ARM that the rate is much lower than 30 year fixed rate. They can always do zero cost refinance later when the rate is lower.
First property I bought in Austin was a 5/1 ARM. In 1996. It was the only way I could qualify for the payment on such an "expensive" 180K house back then And yes I did end up refinancing before the 5 years was up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2022, 07:22 AM
 
Location: Austin, TX
15,268 posts, read 35,619,033 times
Reputation: 8614
Quote:
Originally Posted by atxcio View Post
First property I bought in Austin was a 5/1 ARM. In 1996. It was the only way I could qualify for the payment on such an "expensive" 180K house back then And yes I did end up refinancing before the 5 years was up.
Damn, that was expensive! My first house in the late 90s (98?) was $99k.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2022, 08:58 AM
 
Location: Round Rock, Texas
12,946 posts, read 13,328,106 times
Reputation: 14005
And I’ll post again my brother’s first house that he bought for $6,500 in 1959…. Just to reiterate how crazy Austin’s real estate market has been….

https://www.trulia.com/p/tx/austin/1...57--1002197980
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2022, 09:39 AM
 
Location: Austin Metroplex, SF Bay Area
3,429 posts, read 1,558,536 times
Reputation: 3303
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScoPro View Post
And I’ll post again my brother’s first house that he bought for $6,500 in 1959…. Just to reiterate how crazy Austin’s real estate market has been….

https://www.trulia.com/p/tx/austin/1...57--1002197980
Yeah sure. Nothing like going back 63 years to make a point, because that's realistic

I bet we could look at every municipality in the country and have some fun quoting prices from 1959
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2022, 01:01 PM
 
11,778 posts, read 7,989,264 times
Reputation: 9930
I think it makes a fair point. $6.9k in 1959 and almost $700k today or an apreciation of about $116k every decade … although the appreciation rate is probably a lot less linear than that and probably a more sharp curve over the last two decades.

Although admittedly there would be no way I would buy that for $700k @ only 900 sqft.. no offense to the brother of course.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2022, 01:09 PM
 
Location: Austin Metroplex, SF Bay Area
3,429 posts, read 1,558,536 times
Reputation: 3303
Quote:
Originally Posted by Need4Camaro View Post
I think it makes a fair point. $6.9k in 1959 and almost $700k today or an apreciation of about $116k every decade … although the appreciation rate is probably a lot less linear than that and probably a more sharp curve over the last two decades.

Although admittedly there would be no way I would buy that for $700k @ only 900 sqft.. no offense to the brother of course.
Fair point compared to what? That's right in line with the median national home values in the 1950s. I don't think it makes any point at all other than real estate across the nation has appreciated substantially since then. That's not isolated to Austin at all. And of course we both know how much things have appreciated in other metroplexes, in particular in California. Austin tends to rank around 20th in regards to metroplexes in the nation on most charts I've seen.

Last edited by blameyourself; 06-23-2022 at 01:18 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2022, 01:25 PM
 
Location: Knoxville, TN
11,411 posts, read 5,960,793 times
Reputation: 22365
Quote:
Originally Posted by ashbeeigh View Post
Because that didn’t cause the Great Recession about 15 years ago.
Yep. I will take, " 'People who never learn their lesson and repeat their mistakes' for $1,000, Alex".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2022, 01:31 PM
 
11,778 posts, read 7,989,264 times
Reputation: 9930
Quote:
Originally Posted by blameyourself View Post
Fair point compared to what? That's right in line with the median national home values in the 1950s. I don't think it makes any point at all other than real estate across the nation has appreciated substantially since then. That's not isolated to Austin at all. And of course we both know how much things have appreciated in other metroplexes, in particular in California. Austin tends to rank around 20th in regards to metroplexes in the nation on most charts I've seen.
True, it's not isolated to AUS nor does it touch the coastal metros, but I'd say that appreciation is still much greater than average in comparison to locations at lets say CLT, ATL, BNA, ORD, TPA ... meaning AUS (for a city its size) has a substantial rate of appreciation.. If averaged out in the time span speaking of 63 years, it would average out to an appreciate rate of aprox 7.6% per year.. ..although as I stated before the appreciation rate likely sky rocketed within the last 2 - 3 decades so within the shorter time span the rate is probably much higher.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:21 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top