Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-14-2009, 08:03 PM
 
675 posts, read 1,905,033 times
Reputation: 372

Advertisements

Well I don't have a problem with new or old houses, but I was just trying to give him ideas along the lines of what he wants. Yes, the older houses hes describing probably seemed cookie cutter when they were built in 1983 or before. Its all subjective.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-14-2009, 08:09 PM
 
2,185 posts, read 6,433,942 times
Reputation: 698
Also, you won't be able to rent for less than 1650 or so in Circle C. There isn't anything, even in the older sections. Try Village of Western Oaks or Legend Oaks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2009, 08:41 PM
 
Location: Central Texas
20,958 posts, read 45,400,512 times
Reputation: 24745
Quote:
Originally Posted by llkltk View Post
Why does older necessarily mean less cookie cutter? Years ago you would have called those houses cookie cutter. Doesn't make sense.
Well, depending on whether or not they're in an HOA neighborhood, and if they are, how strict said HOA is or is not, older homes that may have started as cookie cutter could have developed more individual characteristics over the years through various owners, and through landscaping done to the taste of the individual owners (assuming the HOA allows such). For example, Hyde Park started out as a subdivision, though the homes are more unique due to the times they were built, but over the decades with the changes made by different owners and different builders, they've become much more like a city neighborhood and less like a suburb. (Plus, of course, Austin grew out to engulf Hyde Park long ago.) Same for other older neighborhoods with no HOAs.

So, unless the houses are frozen in time by strict HOA regulations, they will naturally become less cookie cutter.

Does that make more sense?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2009, 08:49 PM
 
2,185 posts, read 6,433,942 times
Reputation: 698
Nope, Raskolnikov made more sense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2009, 08:53 PM
 
477 posts, read 1,581,069 times
Reputation: 132
Just wondering what the HOA could do about naked guy eating in his house with the blinds open. I've never seen anything in CC&R's address that :0)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2009, 08:59 PM
 
Location: Central Texas
20,958 posts, read 45,400,512 times
Reputation: 24745
Quote:
Originally Posted by CATXTransplant View Post
Just wondering what the HOA could do about naked guy eating in his house with the blinds open. I've never seen anything in CC&R's address that :0)
Very good point!

llktlk, what made more sense about Raskolinov's reply? Was it that he agreed that older houses might have seemed cookie cutter at the time they were built? That's not really an answer as to why, though, is it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2009, 09:47 PM
 
658 posts, read 2,006,616 times
Reputation: 430
If you look on Zillow for school information please be aware that Westcreek does not go to Crocket as the web site says. Enter the address here and see what school is really currently attached to the address.

https://access.austinisd.org/school_...ries/index.php
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2009, 10:04 PM
 
21 posts, read 37,582 times
Reputation: 11
Thanks for all the info! Definitely needed this insight.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2009, 07:31 AM
 
Location: Austin, TX
15,269 posts, read 35,633,631 times
Reputation: 8617
I should add, security and schools aside, my friend lived in the house for several years and experienced some nice appreciation! Don't know if it has given it back up or not, but this area does have a lot of potential.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2009, 09:18 AM
 
2,185 posts, read 6,433,942 times
Reputation: 698
Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasHorseLady View Post
Very good point!

llktlk, what made more sense about Raskolinov's reply? Was it that he agreed that older houses might have seemed cookie cutter at the time they were built? That's not really an answer as to why, though, is it?
I just don't agree with you. Most of the homes in Hyde Park haven't had renovation, and they all look the same to me. No square footage, same boring boxy rooms. History does not make a house non cookie cutter. That's just a mindset of certain people. In 50 years, you would say that Circle C homes are unique. That's just the way it goes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:06 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top