Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-15-2007, 06:54 PM
 
575 posts, read 2,496,089 times
Reputation: 149

Advertisements

Too bad we left??? Hehe.

http://www.statesman.com/search/content/business/stories/personalfinance/04/08/8burns.html (broken link)

Edit: Sorry, the title should be "Assuming this is an adequately researched thesis, I do like the conclusions."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-15-2007, 07:21 PM
 
Location: Maple Valley, WA
982 posts, read 3,307,120 times
Reputation: 451
The only problem I have with this article is the example the author used. If you can afford it, of course it's always better to own than to rent if you plan to be in a given area for at least two years. 200K income in San Diego is still a far cry from the median income, so this couple has more options than the average Joe.

Here is another look at the statistics according to San Diego Housing Commission:

http://www.sdhc.net/giaboutus2.shtml (broken link)

The number of foreclosures in the area is scary, and those numbers were from 2005-2006. With the sub-prime bubble-pop, I'm guessing it's going to get worse for 2007, and the median home price will drop. They'll still get the tax write-off though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2007, 07:32 PM
 
575 posts, read 2,496,089 times
Reputation: 149
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrsengle View Post
The only problem I have with this article is the example the author used. If you can afford it, of course it's always better to own than to rent if you plan to be in a given area for at least two years. 200K income in San Diego is still a far cry from the median income, so this couple has more options than the average Joe.

Here is another look at the statistics according to San Diego Housing Commission:

http://www.sdhc.net/giaboutus2.shtml (broken link)

The number of foreclosures in the area is scary, and those numbers were from 2005-2006. With the sub-prime bubble-pop, I'm guessing it's going to get worse for 2007, and the median home price will drop. They'll still get the tax write-off though.
Good, I hope to get some good education everytime I post.

I don't know why, but when I saw his starting salary of $200K, I didn't even blink an eye! Doh, even though I got a very small raise when we moved out here, it was based on a lower salary after taking a 10% pay cut when I was hit by a full site closure for the high tech company I was working for over 8 years. And, it wasn't $200K!

I guess even though the article may make me feel better that we can rejoin the California market if we choose (fat chance, we wouldn't have enough for down payment), it could still be a sound decision. We have "two" reasons not to even think about it, and they are 6 3/4 and 8 years old.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2007, 07:37 PM
 
Location: Austin TX
1,207 posts, read 6,279,897 times
Reputation: 420
Cali...when we moved out of CA several years ago, we did it with the assumption that we'd never be able to get back in (if we ever wanted to)...now, maybe someday there's a chance for a nice little beach shack once husband and I are empty nesters!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2007, 08:02 PM
 
575 posts, read 2,496,089 times
Reputation: 149
Quote:
Originally Posted by gigi927 View Post
Cali...when we moved out of CA several years ago, we did it with the assumption that we'd never be able to get back in (if we ever wanted to)...now, maybe someday there's a chance for a nice little beach shack once husband and I are empty nesters!
I found a beach shack once, and of course this was CA standards, so it was only one room. Actually, it was really just a bathroom, not be gross or anything, but I was really starting to like it.

Then someone else must have found the same place, and I became worried about a bidding war because they were trying to come inside too. But when I listened closely, they just kept saying, "hey, don't hog the "Port 'O Potty" and then I realized it was actually NOT for sale, yet...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-15-2007, 08:17 PM
 
Location: Austin TX
1,207 posts, read 6,279,897 times
Reputation: 420
Quote:
Originally Posted by FromCalitoSteinerRanch View Post
I found a beach shack once, and of course this was CA standards, so it was only one room. Actually, it was really just a bathroom, not be gross or anything, but I was really starting to like it.

Then someone else must have found the same place, and I became worried about a bidding war because they were trying to come inside too. But when I listened closely, they just kept saying, "hey, don't hog the "Port 'O Potty" and then I realized it was actually NOT for sale, yet...



Funny, yet not too far from the truth, either!!!!

thanks for making my day with that laugh!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2007, 11:19 AM
 
Location: Maple Valley, WA
982 posts, read 3,307,120 times
Reputation: 451
I think the worst part about the statistics listed in the website I posted was the statement: 'The minimum annual household income first-time buyers need to purchase a median-priced home at $472,000 in San Diego is about $100,000. (San Diego Metropolitan, 3/07; California Association of Realtors) '

Even if they had a 72K downpayment and 5% interest on a 30 year loan, their monthly payment would be $2147 (according to bankrate.com). That's about half of their net monthly income. I'm not saying it can't be done, but add a couple of kids and a car note to the mix, and there's no wiggle room if there's an emergency - let alone saving for retirement.

OK - not half, about 1/3. IF they had 72K to put down, which isn't even 20%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:19 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top