Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-08-2009, 05:21 AM
 
Location: Austin
2,522 posts, read 6,035,128 times
Reputation: 707

Advertisements

Pretty hair-rasing info from the IMF......... the body that essentially runs the show, and the closest thing to a consortium of national banks, sez that lending for US growth from outside the US will be a pale glimmer of the pre-bust years.........

Where will the money for Austin to grow like it has last 5-10 years come from now? Are they planning on printing their own notes? Establishing their own little federal reserve?

Here's the survey...a little technical, but still quite understandable....read the first part about international lending to the US(the same source of lending that propped up the housing market and growth of the top-of-the-heap growing metros like Vegas and Austin, and see where we stand....)

The gist......the taps have been turned off, and our own lending sources long ago received a one-off bail out(national banks such as Goldman and Citi)........

Where oh where will the money for Austin's buildout come from now?

http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/...g/wreo1009.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-08-2009, 12:07 PM
 
Location: Central Texas
13,714 posts, read 31,159,468 times
Reputation: 9270
Inthecut - once again you are trying oh so hard to paint a bleak future for Austin.

That report of course doesn't mention Austin. It raises questions and doubt about the near and medium term economic recovery.

None of the issues it presents are unique to Austin.

If what that report says is true - Austin will not suffer any more than any other city in the US.

I think it is entirely possible that if capital is precious - investors will choose carefully where they invest. Austin could still be a net winner. Investors will not choose Detroit or Philadelphia or other cities where economic factors are likely to remain unfavorable.

Business will continue to make decisions the way they always have - they will seek locations that offer favorable taxation, a supply of appropriately skilled workers, and the natural resources they need.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2009, 12:51 PM
 
8,231 posts, read 17,312,752 times
Reputation: 3696
Once again, the truth lies somewhere between ITC's doom and gloom and the rosy scenario dewy eyed hopefulness of some. Our economy- that of the US- is headed downhill fast. We are quicly losing our place as the world's reserve currency, our unemplyoment rate will continue to grow, as will the deficit. With Obama care and the 'green revolution' on the horizon, it's not a pretty picture. I think that Texas is a bright spot, and Austin in particular, thanks to a (relatively) conservative state government. I do worry that the recent arrivals to Texas from the tax and spend, welfare states, especially California, don't bring their procilivity for nanny state policies here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2009, 06:32 PM
 
3,787 posts, read 6,997,228 times
Reputation: 1761
Quote:
Originally Posted by mimimomx3;11536547. I do worry that the recent arrivals to Texas from the [B
tax and spend, welfare states, especially California[/b], don't bring their proclivity for nanny state policies here.


Would you mind giving me an example of a nanny state policy so I know whether or not I'm "one of those" people?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2009, 07:45 PM
 
8,231 posts, read 17,312,752 times
Reputation: 3696
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldtoiletsmkgdflrpots View Post
Would you mind giving me an example of a nanny state policy so I know whether or not I'm "one of those" people?
In my opinion, 'nanny state government' is all about legislation that encroaches on personal liberty in order to prevent any all possible injury- those include bans of smoking, drinking, transfats, driving, property, basically- everything. Of course, all those rules come at a cost- writing them, enforcing them and create a bad climate for business...business which stimulates the economy.


Reason Foundation - California: Nanny State 911


Chlorinated Liberty: California Nanny State Aims to Ban Big Screen TVs
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2009, 08:03 PM
 
Location: Austin
1,476 posts, read 1,775,094 times
Reputation: 435
This is actually a good thing. Remember they didn't say that all investment was stopping but decreasing, Also some areas of the USA will continue to grow, like Austin, and some will continue to decline, Detroit. My hope that Austin's growth will be smarter in the future. Before the bust the growth was strip malls, McNeighborhoods, chain resturants, and big box retailers. The growth in Austin will continue, but hopefully in a better way in the future. Keep Austin weird everyone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2009, 08:07 PM
 
Location: Austin
1,476 posts, read 1,775,094 times
Reputation: 435
Default yeah

Quote:
Originally Posted by mimimomx3 View Post
In my opinion, 'nanny state government' is all about legislation that encroaches on personal liberty in order to prevent any all possible injury- those include bans of smoking, drinking, transfats, driving, property, basically- everything. Of course, all those rules come at a cost- writing them, enforcing them and create a bad climate for business...business which stimulates the economy.


Reason Foundation - California: Nanny State 911




Chlorinated Liberty: California Nanny State Aims to Ban Big Screen TVs
Good point! Bans on smoking and transfat are negatively correlated to economic development. Without a doubt they are the reason that California's economy is in the toilet. Care to share more of your economic genius with us?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2009, 08:28 PM
 
1,148 posts, read 2,779,419 times
Reputation: 639
Why bother debating anyone who thinks Bush and Perry were great governors?

Its like talking to a brick wall.

California isnt perfect but neither is Texas. Texas is near bottom in educational standards of all states. Highest number of uninsured children. Highest rate of prison population. We have real problems here that the Republicans have done sod all to fix. In fact they have presided over these declines.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2009, 08:30 PM
 
8,231 posts, read 17,312,752 times
Reputation: 3696
Quote:
Originally Posted by joejitsu View Post
Good point! Bans on smoking and transfat are negatively correlated to economic development. Without a doubt they are the reason that California's economy is in the toilet. Care to share more of your economic genius with us?
Of course, all those rules come at a cost- writing them, enforcing them and create a bad climate for business...business which stimulates the economy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2009, 08:32 PM
 
8,231 posts, read 17,312,752 times
Reputation: 3696
Quote:
Originally Posted by orbius View Post
Why bother debating anyone who thinks Bush and Perry were great governors?

Its like talking to a brick wall.
So.....why is the Texas economy is still strong when others (California, perhaps?) are bankrupt? I think the brick wall is the one that we should erect around Texas to keep the tax and spend liberals OUT.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:52 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top