Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I guess it depends becuase we can still use them if we convert to hydrogen as a fuel source I mean there is lots of water to convert and it only emits steam and condensation out the exhaust and older cars could in theory be converted to run on it and there are no batteries needed. plus it can be fueled like a regular car at a gas station kind like how gas stations have diesel fuel. They could add a pump for hydrogen so the basic infrastructure is already in place plus you do not have to wait at a charge station like you would with an electric car and big heavy batteries would not be needed either.
I guess it depends becuase we can still use them if we convert to hydrogen as a fuel source I mean there is lots of water to convert and it only emits steam and condensation out the exhaust and older cars could in theory be converted to run on it and there are no batteries needed.
True; let's consider ICE for purposes of the poll to be our traditional reciprocating, gasoline-powered, 4 stroke engines.
As long as there is oil to be drilled, there will be an internal combustion engine. There is a lot of money involved in oil.
Truth - I think socio-economic issues will end it before its usable end would warrant. The ICE is - next to the wheel - the most important invention for transportation and commerce the world has seen.
As long as there are gases and liquids to be burned there will be ICE's.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.