U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-27-2011, 03:30 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
810 posts, read 1,696,163 times
Reputation: 585

Advertisements

I noticed the Yukon costs about $1K more than the Tahoe, so was wondering what the differences are between the base models?

Thank you
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-27-2011, 03:45 PM
 
Location: Columbia, California
6,540 posts, read 14,856,581 times
Reputation: 4625
The only difference is the label and brand loyalty.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2011, 09:30 AM
 
13,591 posts, read 17,043,342 times
Reputation: 11706
The difference is really only skin deep, but generally the GMC's come with either a little more standard equipment or have a more upscale interior trim. In every place that it counts, they are identical.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2011, 10:19 AM
 
Location: Phoenix,Arizona
2,815 posts, read 2,492,534 times
Reputation: 2028
The above posts are true

The main reason is that other GM brands could have a truck
line without having the entire Chevy line
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2011, 10:24 AM
 
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
4,487 posts, read 10,119,930 times
Reputation: 3754
There really is no basic differences UNLESS you're talking about stepping up to a Yukon DENALI which has considerable differences between the DENALI package and the LTZ package on the Tahoe. Basic packages? No real difference except brand name as GMC is probably a bit more "upscale".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2011, 11:45 AM
PDD
 
Location: The Sand Hills of NC
5,910 posts, read 6,040,067 times
Reputation: 6623
Since GMC no longer makes Medium Duty trucks I can see them getting out of GMC light duty as well as they are all just Chevy's now anyway.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2011, 12:29 PM
 
Location: Midwest
1,182 posts, read 1,548,435 times
Reputation: 664
Yeah they are nearly Identical. Wife has a Tahoe but we actually like the front end on the Yukon better so if we get another large SUV, guess it'll be the Yukon.

We liked the Tahoe better on the previous generation, though. Go figure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2011, 01:02 PM
 
13,591 posts, read 17,043,342 times
Reputation: 11706
Quote:
Originally Posted by PDD View Post
Since GMC no longer makes Medium Duty trucks I can see them getting out of GMC light duty as well as they are all just Chevy's now anyway.
The only reason GMC exists is to help dealers offer a full product line. It is simply tied to the old dealer franchises. The idea of merging Buick, Pontiac and GMC was that those brands would have a full line to offer. Now that Pontiac is gone, those brands are down to Buick and GMC and the GMC truck line is an important profit center for those dealers.

I agree that GMC as it is makes little sense until you look at it through the context of the dealer network.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2011, 02:29 PM
 
Location: Midwest
1,182 posts, read 1,548,435 times
Reputation: 664
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJGOAT View Post
The only reason GMC exists is to help dealers offer a full product line. It is simply tied to the old dealer franchises. The idea of merging Buick, Pontiac and GMC was that those brands would have a full line to offer. Now that Pontiac is gone, those brands are down to Buick and GMC and the GMC truck line is an important profit center for those dealers.

I agree that GMC as it is makes little sense until you look at it through the context of the dealer network.
I agree. Without GMC, the dealers would greatly suffer. A stand alone Buick dealership wouldn't do nearly as well as the GMC/Buick duo's that exist now. Merging Buick and Caddy dealers isn't a very good option and I can't see a Chevrolet/Buick combination doing well either.

A GMC dealer by itself is doomed simply from the lack of options, the GMC/Buick dealers seem to do very well. Carl Black was a huge dealership network back in Ga, the main dealership was GMC/Buick.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2011, 08:58 PM
 
134 posts, read 244,147 times
Reputation: 49
GMC is more luxurious in vision and in drive, if you look up reviews and ratings, GMC usually has more heavy duty parts, aka itll last you a bit longer. When we worked on the trucks in shop it showed the Sierra is always better parts wise then the silverado. idk if the SUVs are the same way. Havent you heard the logic of some car reviewers "The only reason General Motors has Chevrolet produce trucks and SUVs is so they can overcharge on GMC."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $84,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2014, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 - Top