Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Was the OP referring to a car that would be stored for the long term?
Or, was the OP referring to a car that would be driven occasionally?
You interpreted the question as the former, and I interpreted it as the latter, and I think that we really need the OP to return to the thread in order to clarify the question.
If car is going to be stored over a long period of time, then--yes--I agree with your approach.
If the car is going to be driven only a few times each year, then my approach would be the way to go.
Sunset2000--Can you clarify exactly what type of "sitting" this car will be doing?
Smart. Yes, it was the latter. Would a car be okay if it's only being driven weekly, bi-weekly, or monthly.
It's bad for any car. You need to have it fully warmed up, then continue long enough to burn off any water from condensation. Cars driven infrequently need a lot more oil changes and will still be subject to faster wear of engine, transmission, radiator and exhaust system. The longest lasting cars are those that have a lot of highway driving.
I agree....... and can't say it any better.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.