Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,570 posts, read 81,147,605 times
Reputation: 57792
There are very few differences in cars these days, making them all pretty boring. Other than the Dodge Challenger, Charger, Mustang, Mini and Beetle they all seem to copy Honda and Toyota.
There are very few differences in cars these days, making them all pretty boring.
I've said it before and I'v ebacked it up with picture proof, but cars of any era looked like other cars of that era, with shared styling cues. It all depends on where your interests lie if you can tell them apart at a glance or not.
Even if you dont' know what the car in question is, you can instantly tell what era it's from by those shared styling cues. Cars of the '30s, '40s, '50s, '60s, '70s, etc. Modern cars are no different. *I* can easily tell modern cars apart at a glance, because I'm interested in modern cars. I can guarantee that even if you don't know what these actual cars are, you'll know what era they're from by a set of shared styling cues that all cars of these eras had:
Yeah, those are pretty close in styling, but I don't know if they're similar enough for Ford to sue Kia over it.
I'd say its more like the Fusion rear end, to me anyways.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.