Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-07-2014, 11:25 PM
 
Location: Riverside Ca
22,146 posts, read 33,381,488 times
Reputation: 35433

Advertisements

Looking for a new ( used) work truck. I never buy brand new anymore. Found one and I did the free car fax and one site says 29 reports another says 19. Without paying for it is it even worth the 30-40 bucks to get the report or move on to the next truck.
I had a buddy who used to run car fax vin do for me but he no longer deals in cars.
Should I bother with that many reports or move on to another one. Truck is in Reno so I would have to drive there to see it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-08-2014, 12:56 AM
 
Location: Chicago
38,707 posts, read 102,951,116 times
Reputation: 29981
There's no way of knowing what those reports are unless you get the full report. Could be a titles and registrations, an accident or two, maintenance records, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2014, 01:15 AM
 
89 posts, read 409,045 times
Reputation: 48
What Drover said, and depending how old the truck is that many reports might be a good thing (oil changes etc)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2014, 06:01 AM
 
Location: Riverside Ca
22,146 posts, read 33,381,488 times
Reputation: 35433
I guess 30-40 bucks beats 300 in fuel.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2014, 06:18 AM
 
Location: Annandale, VA
5,094 posts, read 5,162,772 times
Reputation: 4231
Don't believe the CarFax. They do not include the complete history of a vehicle. I traded my 2011 BMW and when they showed me the CarFax, it did not include an accident and repairs that were done over a year ago at a BMW dealership.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2014, 06:46 AM
 
Location: Raleigh
13,661 posts, read 12,341,234 times
Reputation: 20109
The Carfax is kind of like a credit report or criminal background check for a car. Just because it all pops up clean, doesn't guarantee anything. All the same, you would still run that information before renting a property to someone or hiring them to work in a bank.

Carfax basically mines data and collates it. Lately, they've expanded the data that gets mined to go as far as collecting many basic maintenance records. It catches most accidents, but if there isn't an accident report, insurance claim, etc, there is no paper trail for them to report; thus, if you back into a pole and hand the bodyman a wad of cash, no report on the carfax. All the same, if you end up in dire financial straits, borrow money from a friend and pay promptly, it wouldn't be on a credit report that your lights almost got turned off and your car almost got repo'd.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2014, 08:11 AM
 
1,218 posts, read 3,452,701 times
Reputation: 1869
Even with a clean carfax get a ppi. There could be body work that wasn't reported to insurance company or other issues that don't show
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2014, 08:21 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
2,743 posts, read 4,810,755 times
Reputation: 3949
CarFax is a help as it will show incidents, but know that they are far FAR from all-inclusive.

I was shopping for a new or used car a while back, and subscribed to Carfax's 30 days of unlimited car reports.

As long as I was checking out prospective used cars, I went ahead and got a report on my current (just totaled) car, just for the heck of it.

I was the first and only owner, and it had previously been in 2 minor fender-benders ($2-3k) and 1 medium ($5k) rear-end. Since all happened several years in the past, and all had been repaired by 'the other guy's" insurance, at a dealership or full service body-shop, they should have all been on the books and reported by CarFax. Only one was.

Bottom line? If CarFax shows you some problems, that's useful information (and worth the price), but there certainly could be other events not listed.
Get it inspected!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2014, 09:10 AM
 
14,780 posts, read 43,582,793 times
Reputation: 14621
There is nothing wrong with checking CarFax to see what it says. The mistake people make is in believing that CarFax is 100% accurate. For the most part information on the report you get is correct, it just might not be all of the information for that particular vehicle. It can also get very wonky on the accident records. A vehicle could have had a moderate bumper scrape professionally repaired and it will show up as an "accident" and look the same as a vehicle that had $10,000 worth of damage in an actual accident.

When it comes to the number of entries on the report that is influenced by many things. When a vehicle is first put up for sale, sold and registered, that can easily account for 6 or more records on the report. If the owner then changed addresses, that could add another record. If the vehicle is traded in and then put up for sale again, that can be another 4 records. Maintenance records can also eat up many entries. Most dealers report any and all services, so you could easily have 8 records for oil changes. Ultimately there is no way to tell much by just the record count. Usually one owner vehicles will have 5-15 records. Two owner vehicles will have 15-25 and three or more will have 25+.

The above is not a hard and fast rule. If you are buying from a dealer, they should have no reason not to provide the CarFax or something similar. If you are buying private, I'm not sure it's necessarily worth your time versus just putting the money towards getting a proper inspection from a mechanic you trust which is something you should do regardless of what the CarFax says. However, if there is a long trip involved to see a potential vehicle, then it might be worth the money to run the CarFax before making the trip. Major red flags on the CarFax are enough indicator that you want to skip that vehicle.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2014, 09:10 AM
C8N
 
1,119 posts, read 3,217,515 times
Reputation: 778
Carfax should be just a starting point.
Regardless of what carfax says, take it in for a PPI.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:06 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top