Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-07-2014, 04:12 PM
 
1,899 posts, read 3,958,042 times
Reputation: 2724

Advertisements

Changing lanes without signaling isn't illegal in my state even though a lot of people think it is. You only have to signal when making a turn, and there are limitations on that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-07-2014, 04:44 PM
 
Location: Prosper
6,255 posts, read 17,097,598 times
Reputation: 9502
I only use my turn signal if my driving is impacting others. IE, if someone is behind me close enough to where they would have to slow down if I'm making a turn, I put my turn signal on. Or, I'm coming up to a cross street and someone is waiting to pull out, and I'm going to turn into the same street, I'll put it on.

But if my actions aren't affecting anyone else, I don't use it. There's no point in doing so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2014, 05:23 PM
 
70 posts, read 163,806 times
Reputation: 65
Quote:
Originally Posted by MckinneyOwnr View Post
I only use my turn signal if my driving is impacting others. IE, if someone is behind me close enough to where they would have to slow down if I'm making a turn, I put my turn signal on. Or, I'm coming up to a cross street and someone is waiting to pull out, and I'm going to turn into the same street, I'll put it on.

But if my actions aren't affecting anyone else, I don't use it. There's no point in doing so.
You're the type of driver who's going to be in for a nice surprise if you drive on streets that I'm paroling.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2014, 05:40 PM
 
Location: Vallejo
21,873 posts, read 25,139,139 times
Reputation: 19072
Quote:
Originally Posted by animalcrazy View Post
It's against the law to talk on cell phones and drive here, yet there they are. I swear you can count ten people talking on phones to every one obeying the law here. Changing lanes on the high way without signaling is tame in comparison to all these distracted drivers.
Is it?

I'm not expert on Chicago law. It's legal in most states.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2014, 05:52 PM
 
Location: SoCal
6,420 posts, read 11,594,830 times
Reputation: 7103
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brannen View Post
You're the type of driver who's going to be in for a nice surprise if you drive on streets that I'm paroling.
Then you would disagree with the officer who said that if you signal when no one's around, you're clearly not paying enough attention to your surroundings which suggests you're driving negligently. (I don't agree with that officer, BTW, but there is at least officer who believes it.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2014, 06:15 PM
 
Location: San Francisco born/raised - Las Vegas
2,821 posts, read 2,110,637 times
Reputation: 1905
For the most part, I don't think that LEOs will bother with citing safe unsignaled lane changes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2014, 06:33 PM
 
419 posts, read 626,000 times
Reputation: 620
try it in nyc with lanes changing signal, 7 out 10 usually accelerate and wouldn't let you pass. Thats why more and more people dont bother with signaling when change lanes
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2014, 06:35 PM
 
70 posts, read 163,806 times
Reputation: 65
Quote:
Originally Posted by oddstray View Post
Then you would disagree with the officer who said that if you signal when no one's around, you're clearly not paying enough attention to your surroundings which suggests you're driving negligently. (I don't agree with that officer, BTW, but there is at least officer who believes it.)
Yes I would disagree...If I'm driving on the freeway late at night and I "know" that nobody is around, I look over my shoulder (checking my blind spot) and signal out of habit. If I was pulled over by an officer and he told me that he pulled me over for using my turn signal appropriately while changing lanes and stated that in doing so I was driving negligently, I would refuse to show him my ID (asserting my 4th amendment rights). If he arrested me for having committed no crime, he/his department would be in for a lawsuit and I would be getting paid. I can't imagine any officer would be that dumb. The few times I have been pulled over I always record the interaction, plus I have a dash cam that way it isn't my word versus theirs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2014, 06:39 PM
 
7,280 posts, read 10,951,104 times
Reputation: 11491
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMillersWife View Post
Around here, the cops are the main ones on their cell phones/texting while driving.
Indeed. Many laws regarding texting and cell phone use exempt law enforcement from the prohibition. While there is some reason, such as using the phone if a call were relayed from someone calling in an emergency and the first hand info was critical, that is rarely the case, they drive around with phones stuck to their ears quite often.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-07-2014, 06:41 PM
 
2,994 posts, read 5,589,690 times
Reputation: 4690
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brannen View Post
Yes I would disagree...If I'm driving on the freeway late at night and I "know" that nobody is around, I look over my shoulder (checking my blind spot) and signal out of habit. If I was pulled over by an officer and he told me that he pulled me over for using my turn signal appropriately while changing lanes and stated that in doing so I was driving negligently, I would refuse to show him my ID (asserting my 4th amendment rights). If he arrested me for having committed no crime, he/his department would be in for a lawsuit and I would be getting paid. I can't imagine any officer would be that dumb. The few times I have been pulled over I always record the interaction, plus I have a dash cam that way it isn't my word versus theirs.
In some states you can't record audio of a police officer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:06 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top