Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-02-2015, 05:03 AM
 
17,504 posts, read 17,394,520 times
Reputation: 25486

Advertisements

Read that the base engine for the upcoming 2016 Malibu is 1.5L turbo 4. Can't find horsepower/torque rating yet. Currently the GM 1.4L turbo 4 is 138 HP. Hyundai/Kia's 1.6L turbo 4 is 178 HP & 195 torque. If GM can get the horsepower and torque close to Hyundai/Kia's 1.6L turbo numbers and set the gearing and engine mapping properly I think it could work well. What's odd is for the Hyundai Sonata, the 1.6L turbo is the faster of the Sonata engines while also being the most fuel efficient. If GM can get the new base engine acceleration to be between 7 to 8 seconds 0-60 and have a good smooth torque acceleration feel, I think it could work well. Be interesting to see the fuel economy numbers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-02-2015, 08:36 AM
 
4,684 posts, read 6,098,475 times
Reputation: 3985
All-New Malibu is Larger, More Technological and Efficient

An all-new, Ecotec 1.5L turbo is the standard engine in the 2016 Chevrolet Malibu, offering a GM-estimated 37 mpg on the highway. It is part of a new global family of small-displacement gas engines designed with greater power density to deliver confident performance with excellent efficiency.
The new 1.5L turbo employs the stop/start technology introduced on the 2014 Malibu, which enhances efficiency in stop-and-go driving, contributing to a GM-estimated 27 mpg in city driving – an 8-percent increase over the current model. On the highway, 1.5L-equipped models also feature active grille shutters that reduce aerodynamic drag to optimize efficiency.
The Malibu’s more-efficient standard engine delivers a GM-estimated 160 horsepower (119 kW) and 184 lb-ft of torque (250 Nm). The torque is comparable to the current model’s standard 2.5L naturally aspirated engine in a vehicle package that’s nearly 300 pounds lighter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2015, 09:11 AM
 
8,272 posts, read 10,904,126 times
Reputation: 8909
Listen.

Stay away from anything with the word "turbo" in it.

These are expensive items to repair when they break.

There are enough non-turbo cars out there pick one.

And find one with a timing chain - skip the timing belt engines.

Unless, of course, you plan to trade before the manufacturers warranty expires. Then get anything you like.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2015, 09:25 AM
 
4,684 posts, read 6,098,475 times
Reputation: 3985
Quote:
Originally Posted by unit731 View Post
Listen.

Stay away from anything with the word "turbo" in it.

These are expensive items to repair when they break.

There are enough non-turbo cars out there pick one.

And find one with a timing chain - skip the timing belt engines.

Unless, of course, you plan to trade before the manufacturers warranty expires. Then get anything you like.

Its a GM car, it will self destruct at the 5 yr mark and you will want to trade it in. I still have yet to have a GM car where things dont start breaking at the 5 yr mark.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2015, 10:46 AM
 
Location: Floribama
18,939 posts, read 43,334,289 times
Reputation: 18732
I don't think i'd touch it. In my climate it looks like a recipe for bad turbos, overheating, and blown head gaskets.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2015, 11:18 AM
 
8,272 posts, read 10,904,126 times
Reputation: 8909
Quote:
Originally Posted by SAAN View Post
Its a GM car, it will self destruct at the 5 yr mark and you will want to trade it in. I still have yet to have a GM car where things dont start breaking at the 5 yr mark.

The quality of all cars today is about the same.
Korean cars a little behind in the long run.
European cars are good but when it comes time for repairs very expensive.

I'd stick with US/Canada cars for the long run.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top