Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-07-2015, 04:59 PM
 
Location: Eastern Washington
17,213 posts, read 57,052,961 times
Reputation: 18574

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Felix C View Post
"Performance was choked by a catalytic converter that forced the W-25 350 and W-30 455 engines to exhale through a single exhaust system and power numbers dropped from 180 hp (or 200 hp) and 230 hp in 1974 to 170 hp and 190 hp respectively, in 1975.
The Turbo 400 backed the 455 and the 350 used the Turbo 350. Rear gearing was reduced to a salt-flats-friendly 2.56:1 from 3.08:1 in an effort to scavenge for some fuel economy from the heavy A-body, though 2.73:1 and 3.08:1 gears were optional, as was an Anti-Spin differential."

Yes, times were tough then but plenty of potential in the above.

Mine is here. Actually it was quicker than the 1975 although fitted only with a 5.0liter Olds.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NwWstoMUtnk
True. Early catalysts didn't flow that well. If someone has a more or less completely stock 1975 W-25 or W-30, just adding dual exhausts would probably wake it up quite a bit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-07-2015, 05:53 PM
 
Location: Lake Grove
2,752 posts, read 2,759,477 times
Reputation: 4494
I had an 87 442 that looked gorgeous but was underpowered. I say had, but only for a week. It was stolen, never to be seen again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2015, 06:01 PM
 
Location: North Carolina
715 posts, read 1,039,073 times
Reputation: 658
Chevy Citation leaps to mind
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2015, 06:04 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC & Augusta, GA
899 posts, read 1,015,062 times
Reputation: 1023
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zen88 View Post
I had an 87 442 that looked gorgeous but was underpowered. I say had, but only for a week. It was stolen, never to be seen again.
One reason I don't like owning a G-body Cutlass is I have to constantly worry about someone trying to steal it (already have had 2 theft attempts)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2015, 06:31 PM
 
Location: Dayton OH
5,761 posts, read 11,363,264 times
Reputation: 13549
Dodge Dart / Plymouth Valiant from the early to mid 70s were plain looking but well mannered and reliable cars. I drove a used 73 Valiant 4 door with 225 cubic inch slant 6 from 1979 to early 1990s. It was based on a lot of tried and tested components from many prior years of Dart / Valiant models. The 73 Valiant had traditional slender chrome bumpers, not the ugly "crash test" big bumpers that were draped across the 74 to 76 model Dart / Valiant.

After 1976, Dodge / Plymouth drove themselves off the cliff with the introduction of the poorly made and unreliable Aspen / Volare models. Those two cars ruined Chrysler / Dodge / Plymouth for over a decade.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2015, 07:13 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,508 posts, read 33,300,433 times
Reputation: 7622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dburger View Post
I would think a 2.2 Turbo II or III would rival a V8 in a straight line and certainly best it in cornering and top speed. Plus, they're a lot cheaper and better sleeper material...
Quite a few of the '60s V-8 muscle cars were running deep into the 13s in the 1/4 mile.

The '60s muscle cars also did not look like an import which the '80s "Charger" and Omni did.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2015, 07:20 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC & Augusta, GA
899 posts, read 1,015,062 times
Reputation: 1023
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleet View Post
The '60s muscle cars also did not look like an import which the '80s "Charger" and Omni did.
I fail to see a problem with this.

One of my bucket list items is to be an outcast and run Hot Rod Powertour in a 2nd generation (1978-83) Dodge Challenger. I love those and the Sapporos as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2015, 07:23 PM
 
Location: Lake Grove
2,752 posts, read 2,759,477 times
Reputation: 4494
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dburger View Post
One reason I don't like owning a G-body Cutlass is I have to constantly worry about someone trying to steal it (already have had 2 theft attempts)

I knew someone with an 87 Cutlass that was stolen even though it was parked in front of a newer Lincoln Town Car. They squeezed the olds out from in front of the Lincoln and drove away.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2015, 07:31 PM
 
Location: The New England part of Ohio
24,099 posts, read 32,448,969 times
Reputation: 68302
Quote:
Originally Posted by froglipz View Post
Thinking back during the 10 years 1975-1985 seems every car made was awful. Were there any cars from that time period that weren't?

No. I can't think of any. These were ugly cars.

The Chevy Monte Carlo from the 80s? That has to be the biggest monstrosity I've ever seen.

The first one (1970) was a nice looking car. After that? Uhhh no thanks.

Automobiles were pretty much all ugly during that time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-07-2015, 07:39 PM
 
Location: Sarasota FL
6,864 posts, read 12,072,821 times
Reputation: 6744
Big GM mistakes-
Cadillac Cimarron
Full size cars with diesel engine. Gas engines converted to diesel
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top