Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-23-2008, 07:00 AM
 
Location: Alexandria, VA
148 posts, read 644,782 times
Reputation: 121

Advertisements

On TV they were talking about the oil crisis of 1973-1974. I can remember that during a four month period in that era it was nearly impossible to get gasoline and many stations had long lines and odd even license plate requirements. Of course back then most stations had only 3-4 pumps per station.

During that time Congress passed a law that said we would be energy independent within ten years. They invested millions into cars that would use alternative energy sources.

Now 35 years later not much has been done!

Why? The cost of oil went back down and people moved on. Maybe a good reason for the prices to go up not down so we have to put a fire under people who will produce a car using alternative (to gasoline) energy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-23-2008, 11:03 AM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, USA
3,131 posts, read 9,373,230 times
Reputation: 1111
There was lines in 1977 (or '78?) if you could find an open station. I think it got up to 75 cents. I don't remember the prices of everything else being affected because of it like today.

I drive a 1988 car that gets 18/27mpg. I don't notice much difference today and sometimes not any or not even as good unless it's a hybrid of some sort. We can't rely on our govt. for anything. Private citizens are making some headway:

1 Gallon of Gas, 100 Miles — $10 Million: The Race to Build the Supergreen Car
1 Gallon of Gas, 100 Miles — $10 Million: The Race to Build the Supergreen Car
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2008, 11:05 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,768,722 times
Reputation: 24863
I was involved in that alternate fuel challenge in college. We settled on a gasoline engine for the contest because it was practical and a VW dealer gave us one. I also owned a couple of GM Diesels of that era. They worked fine until the head bolts broke and the engine sized. They would go about 80 k miles and die. One engine was in a pick up and the other in a wagon. The wagon got over 30 mpg on the expressway at 65 mph. The pick up engine was replaced with an Olds gas engine and is still running! Not bad.

In this day of 4 – 5 $/gal gasoline I would suggest a few year old Corolla or the equivalent unless you really need a pick up truck. Personally I would never spend the money to buy a new car because I would never recover the initial depreciation. Buy transport, not ego.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2008, 11:17 AM
 
Location: WA
5,641 posts, read 24,949,730 times
Reputation: 6574
Quote:
Originally Posted by total_genius View Post
...
Why? The cost of oil went back down and people moved on. Maybe a good reason for the prices to go up not down so we have to put a fire under people who will produce a car using alternative (to gasoline) energy.
Yeah, the economics slowed investigation into alternatives but the is not the primary reason...

Gasoline/diesel is an amazing fuel that packs a great deal of power in a small volume that is cheap, easy to store, transport, and use. The inconvienient truth is that there are no alternatives yet identified that can compete.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2008, 03:21 PM
 
Location: Earth
4,237 posts, read 24,775,959 times
Reputation: 2274
In 1977 GM began downsizing their cars. The 1977 Caprice/Impala/Bonneville/Le Sabre/Delta 88 were smaller and lighter than the previous years.

Then in 1978 they did the same thing with the A body line. Malibus, Monte's, Grand Prix's, Regals, Cutlass....all were down sized.

Then come 1980 the first FWD cars by GM were introduced. Chrysler had already done that 2 years earlier with the Omni and Horizon.

Add to that the 55 mph speed limit.

All of these acts I figure was due to becoming more energy efficient after the gas crunch.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top