|

07-19-2008, 11:37 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: London,UK / Tampa,FL
2,002 posts, read 788,818 times
Reputation: 386
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boomerang
The most obvious flaw in this logic is that weight isn't the only factor in MPG.
My extremely large (by today's standards) 4-door, 8 cyl sedan gets better mileage than many cars 2/3 to 1/2 its size -- e.g., Toyota Camry, "Mini" Cooper, many others.
I wouldn't mind semis being subject to a lower national limit as they are in some European countries, just for safety reasons. This does impact traffic flow though - on a 2 lane highway you can end up with the right lane solidly packed with slow-moving trucks while all cars must stay to the left if they want to stay out of the way of trucks and/or pass.
|
imagine the mileage that you'd get if your car was lighter.
|
|

07-19-2008, 11:41 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
2,860 posts, read 1,426,783 times
Reputation: 5129
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boomerang
The most obvious flaw in this logic is that weight isn't the only factor in MPG.
My extremely large (by today's standards) 4-door, 8 cyl sedan gets better mileage than many cars 2/3 to 1/2 its size -- e.g., Toyota Camry, "Mini" Cooper, many others.
|
Its safer too. If you get into an accident with a car that weighs half as much as yours, you'll bounce around 1/4 as much as the occupants of the tin can. Simple physics....
|
|

07-19-2008, 11:42 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Surf City, NC
580 posts, read 475,679 times
Reputation: 325
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell
There was a collision near me the other day where one Volvo rear-ended another Volvo, burned like a Pinto.  I think the general perception of Volvos being safer than anything else is based more on marketing than fact.
|
Maybe, maybe not. I hope I don't find out. A Volvo's gotta be safer than the Ford Escort I was driving before, though.
Point is, I'll be holding onto the Volvo until there are a lot fewer 6,000 lb. behemoths on the road. Then I'll think about getting a Civic or a Camry or something that gets 30 mpg or more.
I wish they'd make more small station wagons. You've got the best of both worlds there, good mileage and a lot of cargo space with the rear seats folded down.
|
|

07-19-2008, 11:44 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
2,860 posts, read 1,426,783 times
Reputation: 5129
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 58robbo
imagine the mileage that you'd get if your car was lighter.
|
A 70,000 pound truck (or Lorry in your case since you don't live in the US), can get 10 mpg. To get the same efficiency in a 1200 pound car, you'd have to get 580 mpg.
|
|

07-19-2008, 11:51 AM
|
|
The Franchise
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
1,216 posts, read 741,441 times
Reputation: 494
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sterlinggirl
Its safer too. If you get into an accident with a car that weighs half as much as yours, you'll bounce around 1/4 as much as the occupants of the tin can. Simple physics....
|
Simple circular logic. Weight =/= immediate safety. In fact, the weight of a vehicle can increase your risk of death in some cases. And I'm talking cars built nowadays, not cars built in the 40's - 60's. Back then when the entire car was essentially a hunk of painted metal, your safety was a lot more assured. SUV car bodies are nowhere near that solid, the bulk of the weight is in the engine compartment and underbody. That's the prime reason that super speeding is a dangerous profession in an SUV - the weight distribution is often uneven. Mitsubishi learned that the hard way with the Montero.
Also, all you're talking about is the risk of collision with another car. What about road hazards? Guarantee you're probably better off dodging hazards in an SLK 230 Kompressor than you are in any SUV.
|
|

07-19-2008, 12:02 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
2,860 posts, read 1,426,783 times
Reputation: 5129
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by revelated
Also, all you're talking about is the risk of collision with another car. What about road hazards? Guarantee you're probably better off dodging hazards in an SLK 230 Kompressor than you are in any SUV.
|
Drive an X5 some day and get back to me.
|
|

07-19-2008, 12:02 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: London,UK / Tampa,FL
2,002 posts, read 788,818 times
Reputation: 386
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sterlinggirl
A 70,000 pound truck (or Lorry in your case since you don't live in the US), can get 10 mpg. To get the same efficiency in a 1200 pound car, you'd have to get 580 mpg.
|
your point?
|
|

07-19-2008, 12:07 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
2,860 posts, read 1,426,783 times
Reputation: 5129
|
|
|
My point is that the mods should move this thread to the politics and controversies forum.
|
|

07-19-2008, 12:27 PM
|
|
Taipan
Status:
"NO to Obamacare"
(set 25 days ago)
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV and NW of Florence Junction, AZ
21,180 posts, read 7,474,981 times
Reputation: 2930
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell
A sample size of one is what one of my old professors would refer to as 'statiscally insignificant'. The fact is just about any modern production vehicle is designed to do the same in a collision.
|
Actually - it is far from "one" - Volvo files are repleat with many, many, MANY files - with the same outcome -
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|