U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Aviation
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply
 
Unread 06-24-2011, 01:37 PM
 
9,716 posts, read 2,639,787 times
Reputation: 3893
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuling View Post
Regarding those technical issues, they really should be more thorough there. It's not a TV set we're talking about, there are hundreds of lives at stake on every flight.
Meh. Both Boeing and Airbus make very safe planes. Crew training and maintenance have a much bigger influence on the safety of any given flight, and those are of course dependent on the airline, not the aircraft manufacturer.

Anyway, Airbus and Boeing tend to leap-frog each other in orders - Boeing doesn't really have anything to match the A320neo. Next year, Airbus is likely to lose orders to the 787.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Unread 06-24-2011, 01:38 PM
 
5,511 posts, read 2,033,508 times
Reputation: 2662
If it ain't Boeing I ain't Going! Atlantic Airbus Crash Pits Brain Against Computer Encroaching on Cockpit - Bloomberg
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 06-24-2011, 01:48 PM
 
Location: Portugal
13,308 posts, read 5,388,938 times
Reputation: 4756
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA View Post
Meh. Both Boeing and Airbus make very safe planes. Crew training and maintenance have a much bigger influence on the safety of any given flight, and those are of course dependent on the airline, not the aircraft manufacturer.
How safe is VERY safe? I think they have to be absolutely safe.

The problem is one can't really test planes like cars or other relatively small, cheap stuff (crash tests for jumbos ). Many of the stress tests are done using simulations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 06-24-2011, 01:50 PM
Status: "What Would Miles Do?" (set 26 days ago)
 
28,193 posts, read 11,871,987 times
Reputation: 10810
Not to throw flames on the fire, but according to the linked story, the main difference was in the number of Airbus A320s vs Boeings much older 737 and the for the buyer the decision came down to fuel efficiency (sound vaguely familiar to problems with the sale of American autos). Also after a casual check of the safety records for both planes while the Airbus has had twice the number of accidents and incidents, I can only detect one accident that could be blamed on the aircraft and not the crew. If others have better information, I will certainly deferred to that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 06-24-2011, 01:52 PM
 
565 posts, read 170,353 times
Reputation: 162
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuling View Post
How safe is VERY safe? I think they have to be absolutely safe.
.
Neuling, on which planet do you live.
Ever been on a French "autoroute" anything is safe in comparison.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 06-24-2011, 01:57 PM
 
18,006 posts, read 6,170,254 times
Reputation: 6188
The Boeing 787 is already beating Airbus. The A320neo is Airbus's response to the failed A350 that didn't pass wingload testing. The failed A350 nearly put the company in a flat spin of which it almost didn't recover. Without subsidies, Airbus would be a thing of the past. The Boeing 787 is the front runner by far. Airbus had a good order this year.....it won't be anywhere near Boeing's success after the launch of the 787 and they know it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 06-24-2011, 02:00 PM
 
Location: Portugal
13,308 posts, read 5,388,938 times
Reputation: 4756
Quote:
Originally Posted by henrjam View Post
Neuling, on which planet do you live.
Ever been on a French "autoroute" anything is safe in comparison.
Sure. Still, I think hardware or software failures or errors are absolutely unacceptable with planes.

I read that spare parts are a major source of problems, it is a lucrative business, which attracts the wrong kind of people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 06-24-2011, 02:03 PM
 
Location: Portugal
13,308 posts, read 5,388,938 times
Reputation: 4756
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
The Boeing 787 is already beating Airbus. The A320neo is Airbus's response to the failed A350 that didn't pass wingload testing. The failed A350 nearly put the company in a flat spin of which it almost didn't recover. Without subsidies, Airbus would be a thing of the past. The Boeing 787 is the front runner by far. Airbus had a good order this year.....it won't be anywhere near Boeing's success after the launch of the 787 and they know it.
One of Airbus' problem is the company structure. It is a multinational company where German, French, and other interests collide. The atmosphere is said to be very bad.
In the military branch I assume Airbus simply lacks the experience Boeing has thanks to the MIC in the US.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 06-24-2011, 02:21 PM
 
565 posts, read 170,353 times
Reputation: 162
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuling View Post
Sure. Still, I think hardware or software failures or errors are absolutely unacceptable with planes.

I read that spare parts are a major source of problems, it is a lucrative business, which attracts the wrong kind of people.
I never felt safer than in one of those big airliners.
At that time there is nothing I can personally do wrong that might alter my destiny. Let me just say, that feels so good.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 06-24-2011, 02:22 PM
Status: "I'm too big to fail" (set 25 days ago)
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
18,572 posts, read 5,993,461 times
Reputation: 3338
I want to personally thank the folks of Washington for helping to make this possible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $53,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $47,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Aviation
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:49 AM.

© 2005-2013, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 - Top