Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Aviation
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-05-2012, 11:37 AM
 
3,045 posts, read 3,192,643 times
Reputation: 1307

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by personwhoisaperson View Post
» EPA Using Drones to Spy on Cattle Ranchers in Nebraska and Iowa Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

How is this allowed? Its unconstitutional and proof that our privacy is an illusion.
The government has been spying on me by having 'airlines' fly 'airplanes' over my house since I have been born. It's obviously just a ruse and the nanny state is spying on me.

Obviously, I own the air above where I live and the government shouldn't be intruding on me.

I recently had my water and electricity cut off because they were using that to spy on me as well.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-05-2012, 11:57 AM
 
Location: Pa
20,300 posts, read 22,217,585 times
Reputation: 6553
My concern is less with privacy and more with cost. These drones are not cheap. How does the EPA justify the need for drones? Should we also supply every other dept or agency of the fed with them?
Dept of Education? WE need to ensure those play grounds are up to snuff and no non-pc activities are taking place. You know like playing cowboys and indians or something.
Dept of Energy? Fly over houses at night make sure no one is using 100 watt bulbs.
Secret service should be issued a few too.
US Marshals? Yes they need a dozen or so.
We better not use them to patrol our southern border though. That might interfer with operation fast and furious, worse still it mught make illegals feel unwelcome.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2012, 12:04 PM
 
Location: Tyler, TX
23,864 posts, read 24,105,148 times
Reputation: 15135
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
the skies can handle FAR more drones
Quote:
Originally Posted by swagger View Post
I doubt that. I realize that you're connected to the air industry in some way, so I'll leave it to you to prove that the FAA requires less air space for a drone than, say, a Cessna, especially in the middle of a crowded city and with a military base nearby (you responded directly to me, referencing my house specifically, so that's the scenario you have to support).
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
This should answer forthrightly the question you posed about the FAA and use of drones. A rulemaking committee has been convened to figure out how to make it all work. And that's only ONE of the committee's the FAA has put together to integrate UAV's into the national airspace system. It's coming full bore...the train has already left the station.

http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/m...r/1110.150.pdf

http://www.faa.gov/about/initiatives...fact_sheet.pdf
No, it didn't. You didn't provide a single shred of evidence that drones are treated any differently than any other aircraft with respect to the amount of air space required to use one.

In fact, the first document you linked to states, "The Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA), for example, urged us to develop rules for small UAS that require the same operational safety as manned aircraft."

You have yet to prove that the skies will be filled with drones watching our every move. I like you, Aero, but on this, you're just paranoid. If the government really wanted to spy in the way you're implying, they'd go all London on our butts and put cameras on every street corner.

Last edited by swagger; 06-05-2012 at 12:16 PM.. Reason: tyop
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2012, 12:05 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,735,123 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
Manned aircraft have been used for surveillance over private property for many years looking for things such as marijuana growing operations with little/no outcry from the public. Why does the lack of a living breathing pilot matter?

It doesn't matter. It should also be illegal for LE to spy on citizens using helicopters without a warrant.

So here's your outcry: IT SHOULD BE ILLEGAL FOR LE TO SPY ON PEOPLE USING DRONES OR MANNED AIRCRAFT WITHOUT A WARRANT JUST LIKE IT'S ILLEGAL TO USE A WIRETAP WITHOUT A WARRANT AND IT'S ILLEGAL TO ENTER MY HOUSE WITHOUT A WARRANT.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2012, 12:08 PM
 
Location: Silver Springs, FL
23,416 posts, read 36,993,685 times
Reputation: 15560
Quote:
Originally Posted by Versatile View Post
What state do you estimate will be the first one President Obama send Drones over to attack citizens with Hellfire Missiles?
A drone doesnt have the lift to pack a payload of Hellfires.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2012, 12:10 PM
 
78,380 posts, read 60,566,039 times
Reputation: 49651
Speaking specifically to the credibility of the original source, Alex Jones has a long history of making up some pretty fantastic claims. A quick search through past threads around here will find some real doozies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2012, 12:13 PM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,119,311 times
Reputation: 9409
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
Do you not understand you have no expectation of privacy when out in public? In other words, if you have something to hide, don't be whining about getting caught if you're too stupid to hide it.
Since when did your homestead become "the public?" A drone flying over my house watching me read the newspaper on my front porch is breach of my privacy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2012, 12:16 PM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,119,311 times
Reputation: 9409
Quote:
Originally Posted by swagger View Post
It's not apathy. It's pragmatism and objectivity.

With the exception of you stating that they can put more of them in the air, NOBODY has raised a SINGLE difference between drones and helicopters. I've brought it up several times, and every time (sans your response, which I will look over more closely in a bit) my point has been ignored outright.

Like I said, I'd be with you if you were challenging all the bureaucratic red tape we have to deal with just to live our lives, and I'm generally in agreement with you on most of the topics I engage in on the forum, but on this, unless you're screaming just as loud about helicopters and satellites, I have to dismiss your concerns as paranoia.
This is not about bureacracy. If you can't discern the difference between a UAV and a helicopter, i'm not sure what more can be said to you. Two of the most glaring differences is sound and size. I'll leave it up to you to figure out why these two things matter, among the other considerable surveillance and operational advantages of UAV's over helicopters. That's why UAV's are different and are gaining in popularity among Big Brother advocates. I see no reason to engage your apathy any further if your mindset is such that you refuse to challenge your government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2012, 12:16 PM
 
78,380 posts, read 60,566,039 times
Reputation: 49651
Quote:
Originally Posted by kshe95girl View Post
A drone doesnt have the lift to pack a payload of Hellfires.
U.S. official: Al Qaeda leader killed in drone strike in Pakistan - CNN.com

The imbedded link in the above link....

Official: 15 militants killed in suspected U.S. drone strike in Pakistan - CNN.com

specifically mentions hellfire and the firing of something like 9 missles.

Those drones are pretty big and don't carry a pilot so at 100lbs a pop the missles aren't too heavy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2012, 12:16 PM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,771,962 times
Reputation: 24863
Is Alex Jones certain that the drones were EPA? The Dept of Agriculture could be doing crop growth surveys at the behest of the farmers or checking on the proper use of Federal Range Land to prevent over grazing. If the EPA were using the drones they could be checking for Haz Waste spills from oil/gas fracking operations. A drone can cover a lot more ground than the people starved EPA.

There are more good reasons for using drones than reasons not to. Law enforcement is the least of them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Aviation

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top