U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Aviation
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-02-2013, 08:32 AM
 
5,271 posts, read 11,289,915 times
Reputation: 5126

Advertisements

Even though the airline mentioned in this article is not large (no pun intended), I think it had to start somewhere. We've let political correctness blind us to many truths, and one is that overly huge people need to pay for two seats, or pay more for their fare. I don't think it is unfair for airlines to charge per weight, moving weight costs money and a 105 pound woman should not have to pay the same as a 400 pound man.

Pay by the Pound: Samoa Air Becomes First Airline to Charge Overweight Passengers More - IBTimes UK
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-02-2013, 08:51 AM
 
3,252 posts, read 5,519,475 times
Reputation: 1572
Quote:
Originally Posted by HookTheBrotherUp View Post
Even though the airline mentioned in this article is not large (no pun intended), I think it had to start somewhere. We've let political correctness blind us to many truths, and one is that overly huge people need to pay for two seats, or pay more for their fare. I don't think it is unfair for airlines to charge per weight, moving weight costs money and a 105 pound woman should not have to pay the same as a 400 pound man.

Pay by the Pound: Samoa Air Becomes First Airline to Charge Overweight Passengers More - IBTimes UK

Totally agree... fuel costs are directly related to the quantity of mass moved... simple enough....
Thank G*d I choose business class, as I don't (usually) have to deal with the morbid obese. Not a stereotype nor a bias... I just choose to be with those that have one bit of self-control. JMHO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2013, 08:51 AM
 
Location: North Texas
21,602 posts, read 27,394,024 times
Reputation: 22859
I think people should have to pay by the butt inch. Basically you sit on a bench with a yardstick on it and if your butt spread doesn't fit between 1 and x number of inches, guess what...you have to buy a second seat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2013, 10:59 AM
 
Location: Hougary, Texberta
6,064 posts, read 9,001,242 times
Reputation: 7192
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperSparkle928 View Post
Totally agree... fuel costs are directly related to the quantity of mass moved... simple enough....
Thank G*d I choose business class, as I don't (usually) have to deal with the morbid obese. Not a stereotype nor a bias... I just choose to be with those that have one bit of self-control. JMHO.
Like knowing when not to open your mouth?

I have no problem with the fees, but then give a proper seat. All it is is a money grab. So you can sparkle knowing that someone paid more, but they don't get anymore space.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2013, 11:13 AM
 
1,076 posts, read 1,275,780 times
Reputation: 1950
Makes sense from a fuel cost perspective. I doubt the seat size will be proportional to the passenger's weight and ticket cost, though. It costs more to move a 300 pound adult than it does to move a 90 pound child, but both get a seat with the same width and pitch that is too small for the former and too big for the latter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2013, 01:54 PM
 
595 posts, read 712,553 times
Reputation: 1177
When I was working at the airlines (appr. 5 years ago) we merely took a head count of the passengers and assumed that each adult weighed "x" and each child weighed "y." These weights were increased by a few pounds in the winter due to heavier clothing. Of course in unusual circumstances (e.g. a plane full of football players, sumo wrestlers, etc.) we were required to adjust these weights. An isolated "gravitationally-challenged" passenger was of little concern to the airline, unless their butt was too big to fit in one seat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2013, 02:04 PM
 
Location: Holmdel, NJ
20,589 posts, read 25,392,413 times
Reputation: 12600
i wonder what % of the costs are fuel. i know its a significant cost but when you boil it down to only the cost that weight of the passenger impacts and then the difference between a 300 pounder and a 150 pounder, whats the real increase in cost? there is also the cost of the aircraft, maintenance, employee costs, insurances/taxes/etc. that dont relate to weight being moved.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2013, 02:10 PM
Status: "When PIGS fly, the FAT lady sings" (set 23 days ago)
 
Location: in the miseries
3,240 posts, read 2,973,287 times
Reputation: 3695
I agree! I once had to sit next to a man who
took up his seat and half of mine, too.
He could at least have paid for it!
Wouldn't let me put the arm rest down either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2013, 02:24 PM
 
23,691 posts, read 34,570,921 times
Reputation: 30721
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigDGeek View Post
I think people should have to pay by the butt inch. Basically you sit on a bench with a yardstick on it and if your butt spread doesn't fit between 1 and x number of inches, guess what...you have to buy a second seat.
This. Being heavy shouldn't be the measure. I'm 6'-2 and I weigh 250 lbs. I also fit easily in an airline seat (except for my knees banging against the seat in front of me). If I was required to pay extra I'd never fly again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2013, 02:29 PM
 
Location: Holmdel, NJ
20,589 posts, read 25,392,413 times
Reputation: 12600
im seeing this as a separate issue from making people pay who need 2 seats. maybe im wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Aviation
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2017, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 - Top