Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Aviation
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-21-2014, 07:44 PM
 
Location: Under a bridge
2,420 posts, read 3,847,289 times
Reputation: 2496

Advertisements

A 700 passenger airplane? IMO that would be amazing! An airplane that big would feel like an old Cadillac Coup de Ville rolling over the highway. The way technology is advancing that is not out of the question.

-Cheers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-21-2014, 08:08 PM
 
Location: Business ethics is an oxymoron.
2,347 posts, read 3,331,765 times
Reputation: 5382
I would expect to see more and more people stuffed into existing aircraft before seeing anything like that. I seem to remember reading a story not long ago about how one airline in Europe actually wanted to install standing room only seats a-la amusement park ride. This would allow them to charge something like $10 for flights....and cram about 300 people into a 737-800. Yikes. Just a matter of getting the FAA and equivalent agencies around the world to sign off on it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2014, 08:14 PM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
37,096 posts, read 41,226,282 times
Reputation: 45087
When I saw the title of the thread, I expected it to be about a passenger who weighed over 700 pounds.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2014, 06:40 PM
 
5,114 posts, read 6,084,776 times
Reputation: 7184
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unsettomati View Post
Why not?

...

I'm sure someone whined and complained when the 747 debuted: "Do we really need 400+ people on a flight?". Probably the same OMG-Change-Is-Scary! complaint was made way back when the first aircraft to seat 100+ came along.

It's just a number. Relax.
I remember back in the late 60s or early 70s seeing proposals in Aviation week for 747s with full length upper decks that were claiming they could have 900+ seats on them. As I remember it at the time the big thing against it was time it would take to board or deplane that number of passengers.

There used to be lots of 'proposals' floated in Aviation Week for 747 variants. I remember one military 'cruise missile carrier' that had two rows of rotary launchers on tracks on the main deck with a side door that would allow the missiles to be ejected out the side
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2014, 07:17 PM
 
Location: MMU->ABE->ATL->ASH
9,317 posts, read 20,993,806 times
Reputation: 10443
Japan Air (JAL) had a 747-400 that they used as a shuttle I think it had 660 Seats in a 3-6-3 Config. (All Coach,

If i recall correctly) Never took the plane, but heard they seem to load it fast.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2014, 03:06 AM
 
Location: Heidelberg, Germany
326 posts, read 672,408 times
Reputation: 480
Newsflash: The A380 is already certified for up to 853 passengers (plus 20 crew), although it is normally used in a three class configuration of up to 555 seats.

The "Beluga" pictured in the original post has been flying for many years but is not a passenger aircraft but used by Airbus to transport large aircraft parts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2014, 11:53 AM
 
Location: Denver, CO
1,421 posts, read 1,635,093 times
Reputation: 1751
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stefan_from_Germany View Post
Newsflash: The A380 is already certified for up to 853 passengers (plus 20 crew), although it is normally used in a three class configuration of up to 555 seats.

The "Beluga" pictured in the original post has been flying for many years but is not a passenger aircraft but used by Airbus to transport large aircraft parts.
Just what I was about to say.


Also, don't forget, frequency often trumps capacity of a single flight.

That's why there can be 2-3 dozen NYC-LON flights per day, even if quite a few are on smaller 757-767's instead of 77W's and 744's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2014, 12:11 PM
 
4,715 posts, read 10,515,104 times
Reputation: 2186
If it makes flying cheaper for the consumer, I am all for it. Especially if it makes it a little less cramped.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2014, 04:50 PM
 
Location: Chicago
460 posts, read 778,626 times
Reputation: 714
The aircraft manufacturer still has to be able to show that they can offload all those passengers within a certain amount of time in an emergency, so merely stuffing more seats in is a moot point if they can't meet their emergency exit times.

In re long lines at customs in the US: Global Entry is your friend!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2014, 05:52 AM
 
Location: Maxico
1 posts, read 657 times
Reputation: 10
why this pictures are looking fake and i cannot see this kind of air planes in world..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Aviation
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top