|

01-10-2008, 11:56 AM
|
|
Not a member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: 21231
315 posts, read 304,820 times
Reputation: 32
|
|
|
helenjen,
I try not to engage in personal attacks, but since I am the object of most of it, I feel I should respond. Of course, you know I never said "we could all be killed at any moment." This is the type of overreaching hyperbole used by people with no valid rebuttal. The reason I pointed out the numbers of non-drug related murders is because there is an effort on this board to portray the murder problem in Baltimore as something that doesn't touch "the rest of us."
|
|

01-10-2008, 01:57 PM
|
|
Senior Member
Status:
"Morons are the "
(set 4 days ago)
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
2,798 posts, read 875,947 times
Reputation: 833
|
|
|
Bawlmer,
If I'm directly quoting someone I use quotation marks. I never said that you said, "we could all be killed at any moment," and I was being hyperbolic purposefully so as to match what I read as the hyperbole-masking-as-truth often found in your statements. When you write " I would recommend against moving to Baltimore period!" or "Baltimore has NO redeeming qualities," that is pretty hyperbolic, no? What kind of message do you think you are sending to people who are unfamiliar with Baltimore with that hyperbole? And your comments on crime do make it seem like Baltimore, all of Baltimore, is homicidal death trap.
Ultimately, it's the audience that makes meaning of all of our messages, and I'm telling you that as part of your audience you do sometimes make it seem as if "we could all be killed at any moment."
|
|

01-10-2008, 02:34 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Baltimore, MD
274 posts, read 273,568 times
Reputation: 37
|
|
|
When the Baltimore-lovers post advice about moving to Baltimore, we acknowledge that the city has its problems. We see both sides and post our perspective.
When the haters post, it's as if there is NOTHING positive about living here, and people who are looking to move here are unfairly encouraged to live as far away from Baltimore as possible.
That's the difference.
|
|

01-10-2008, 03:34 PM
|
|
needs coffee
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
1,183 posts, read 1,112,467 times
Reputation: 646
|
|
|
It's funny... I first joined this forum when we were getting ready to move to AZ. I was amazed (and a little scared) by all of the negative posts in the Tucson threads. You'd think that it's a sweltering crap hole by some of the accounts.
I just happened to pop into the Baltimore thread to check it out, and lo and behold, same thing. I think the anonymity of the internet really allows people to vent, rant and unleash their opinions no matter how biased.
It basically boils down to this: all places have their good points and bad. I have had some terrible experiences in Baltimore, but I have also had some wonderful experiences too. If you're thinking about moving to the area, I highly recommend to visit, drive around, talk to people. Don't be so quick to buy a house. Maybe get a short-term rental so you'll have time to really get to know the area. Baltimore does have many unique qualities about it and its own charm (hence the name Charm City).
That's what we did in Tucson, and we were able to make an informed decision on where to buy a home based on first-hand experience.
|
|

01-10-2008, 07:09 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
418 posts, read 339,194 times
Reputation: 52
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Y-Man
When the dealers move up from Greenmont Avenue at night? Yes, you do.
|
I've never witnessed drug dealing in my neighborhood. Also, learn how to spell.
|
|

01-10-2008, 07:24 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
418 posts, read 339,194 times
Reputation: 52
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bawlmer
Good points helenjen. Another way to look at it is 22 % of murders were random victims. That's 62 people killed that had nothing to do with drugs. Just like you and me. Wonder if their families would agree things are looking up?
|
Why do you assume that the other 22% are random victims? They've just never been arrested for a drug-related offense before (or at least don't have a record that the authorities were able to find). It's still a tragedy, no matter what their history, but once again, you try to fit the facts around your tired argument.
|
|

01-11-2008, 09:51 AM
|
|
Not a member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: 21231
315 posts, read 304,820 times
Reputation: 32
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rudy_d
Why do you assume that the other 22% are random victims? They've just never been arrested for a drug-related offense before (or at least don't have a record that the authorities were able to find).
|
Typical response! You accuse me of making an assumption while at the same time you make a huge assumption. Not sure how you KNOW this information. But no one will question this, I'm sure.
|
|

01-11-2008, 10:55 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
234 posts, read 250,434 times
Reputation: 31
|
|
|
No drug dealing in Charles Village? You don't get out much.
|
|

01-11-2008, 06:01 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
418 posts, read 339,194 times
Reputation: 52
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Streetchie
No drug dealing in Charles Village? You don't get out much.
|
I'm sure there's plenty of it, but I'm stating a fact that I've never witnessed open-air, hand-to-hand street deals. Maybe it occurs in the southeast portion closer to Greenmount and North, but not where I am. And yes, I do get out quite regularly and at all times of the day.
|
|

01-11-2008, 06:09 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
418 posts, read 339,194 times
Reputation: 52
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bawlmer
Typical response! You accuse me of making an assumption while at the same time you make a huge assumption. Not sure how you KNOW this information. But no one will question this, I'm sure.
|
I don't profess to know any information. The article stated that 78% of murder victims had prior drug-related arrests, and you stated that the other 22% were innocent victims.
The other 22% could have been arrested previously for any number of crimes. Maybe they were involved in drugs but were just lucky and had never been caught before. Maybe they had just gotten into "the game". Who knows? But given that there is a crime problem in Baltimore, as you like to frequently point out and blow entirely out of proportion, whose assumption is probably more accurate?
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|