Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Maryland > Baltimore
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-30-2014, 03:25 PM
 
5,289 posts, read 7,424,997 times
Reputation: 1159

Advertisements

*Interesting article from The City Paper.


Baltimore's New Deal: WPA level spending has the power to remake the city, but much of it might be going away.
Baltimore's New Deal (illustration by Jon Stollberg / November 25, 2014)

By Edward Ericson Jr. City Paper 3:14 p.m. EST, November 25, 2014

Baltimore City’s first manufacturing forum took place on Oct. 7 in the Hilton, a deluxe hotel the city spent $300 million to build, which has lost about $50 million since its 2008 opening.
Caron Brace, the Mayor’s press secretary, and Joanne Logan, who does the same job for the Baltimore Development Corporation, were seated at a table outside the main hall where a keynote panel was about to discuss Baltimore’s burgeoning constellation of small high-tech incubators and “maker spaces.”
In celebration of the city’s potential as a center of manufacturing, Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake gave a speech, saying we “have everything we need in Baltimore to have strong manufacturing,” which after decades of devastating decline “is poised for a resurgence.”
The desperate need for jobs—and for training for these jobs—in these factories that for the most part do not yet exist here was the event’s subtext. That, and the underlying notion that Baltimore City has the infrastructure—the roads, the rails, the port, the electric grid, the schools, and the water and sewer works—that growing industrial companies need.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-30-2014, 04:28 PM
 
1,310 posts, read 1,511,503 times
Reputation: 811
The article makes a lot of good points. In my own mind there is kind of a devils bargain since the choice is between getting disjointed poorly planned and coordinated projects vs. not getting disjointed poorly planned and coordinated projects. I'm hoping the project to build and repair lots of schools isn't killed or cut back too far.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Maryland > Baltimore
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:47 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top