Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Baseball
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-20-2011, 08:35 AM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 86,968,624 times
Reputation: 36644

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grandstander View Post

You made this up, there is no jeopardy to the runner, the umpire has no authority to call an out on the play save the runner's failure to return immediately to first.
How many times do I have to keep saying this over and over again? Nobody (except you) has alluded to the runner being called out for overrunning first. The runner is in jeopardy of being called out, if he is tagged, after overrunning first, under circumstances which, in the umpire's judgment, do not constitute an immediate return to the base.

On a hit to the outfield, with no play being made on the runner at all, there is no tactical advantage to overrunning first, except to have momentum for continuing to second, which obviates the rule allowing the runner to do so. An immediate return to the base, where there is no need to overrun it at all, is an umpires judgment call, and overrunning a base where no play is being made is prima facie evidence of the runners intent to advance to the next base, which does not meet the test of an immediate return.

Immediate return, in the mind of a prudent umpire, has the meaning of having no thoughts whatsoever of advancing to the next base. The immediacy of return is cancelled the instant the runner indicates, by any means, thoughts of advancing to the next base, and that is how umpires call it when there is a play at first base and, for example, the throw bounces away.

You started out by completely making up a fictitious rule out of whole cloth . .
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grandstander View Post
The rule is that if the batter turns to the right and returns to firstbase, he is safe.
and now you are clutching at straws, using any spurious concatenations, to defend your unsupportable position. The plain fact is, it is an umpires judgment call, and he has nothing to go by but the runner's body language to judge whether the "immediate return" test has been met. If, in the umpire's judgment, it is not immediate return, then the runner has surrendered the immunity of 7.08 (c) and is in jeopardy of being called out if tagged while not touching a base. That's the rule, until you find one that contradicts it.

Last edited by jtur88; 06-20-2011 at 08:54 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-20-2011, 08:43 AM
 
Location: Parts Unknown, Northern California
48,564 posts, read 24,119,848 times
Reputation: 21239
jtur:
You are being utterly absurd with these tortuous attempts to rehabilitate your error. You did what we all do from time to time, wrote something without being certain that it is true. It has been explained to you why it isn't true and you cannot accept that.

Accept it and stop this nonsense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2011, 08:45 AM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
6,405 posts, read 8,986,231 times
Reputation: 8507
Good question. I have no idea and have never heard it addressed before. Someone mentioned avoiding slides at first (could be) it might be a game flow issue to by allowing the runner to make it to first easier. Who knows? I'd love to get the answer.

Another quirk about baseball is the infielders tossing the ball around after an out is made. A few weeks ago I was at a game with my uncle and he pointed out that the ball is never thrown to 1B. Another interesting observation and something I'd never picked up on before.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2011, 08:57 AM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 86,968,624 times
Reputation: 36644
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grandstander View Post
jtur:
You are being utterly absurd with these tortuous attempts to rehabilitate your error. You did what we all do from time to time, wrote something without being certain that it is true. It has been explained to you why it isn't true and you cannot accept that.

Accept it and stop this nonsense.
Wiat a minute. You said "The rule is that if the batter turns to the right and returns to firstbase, he is safe.", and now I'm the one absurdly and tortuously trying to rehabilitate an error? You were hopelessly and irredeemably wrong.

Accept it and stop this nonsense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2011, 09:02 AM
 
Location: Parts Unknown, Northern California
48,564 posts, read 24,119,848 times
Reputation: 21239
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtur88 View Post
Wiat a minute. You said "The rule is that if the batter turns to the right and returns to firstbase, he is safe.", and now I'm the one absurdly and tortuously trying to rehabilitate an error?
Absolutely. You are overlooking, or pretending to overlook, my correction of that statement.
Quote:
So, while not the actual rule, the right turn was a sign of compliance with the rule
Unlike you, when I recognized that I was wrong, I quit insisting that I wasn't.

You may continue to beat, but the horse isn't going to get any deader.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2011, 09:12 AM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 86,968,624 times
Reputation: 36644
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grandstander View Post
Absolutely. You are overlooking, or pretending to overlook, my correction of that statement.


Unlike you, when I recognized that I was wrong, I quit insisting that I wasn't.

You may continue to beat, but the horse isn't going to get any deader.
Good. So you finally agree that the umpire makes the judgment call, based on "signs of compliance".

To me, if the batter-runner, on a clean hit to the outfield, runs past first base, that is a "sign of compliance" with intent to be in motion toward the next base, and the runner is now "between bases" with no immunity. Judgment call, based on signs of compliance.

So now you are saying you were right all along, because you agree with me now that it is a judgment call contingent on signs of compliance.

I don't know if you have ever played baseball before or not, but put yourself in the runners position. You just lined a single to the outfield, and when you get to first, you keep going past the bag at full speed. Where are you going? Why? What is the umpire to conclude from that sign, and how is he to judge your intent?

Last edited by jtur88; 06-20-2011 at 09:26 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-20-2011, 10:38 AM
 
Location: Parts Unknown, Northern California
48,564 posts, read 24,119,848 times
Reputation: 21239
But apparently it isn't dead enough for you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2012, 09:33 PM
 
3,264 posts, read 5,591,232 times
Reputation: 1395
Thumbs up Lance71 you rock

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bondurant View Post
Good question. I have no idea and have never heard it addressed before.
see post #10 by Lancet71. that's the real answer
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2012, 08:01 AM
 
689 posts, read 2,161,094 times
Reputation: 909
Quote:
Originally Posted by grimace8 View Post
see post #10 by Lancet71. that's the real answer
Except that Lancet neglected to cite any rule in support of his answer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2012, 08:38 AM
 
Location: Albuquerque, NM
13,285 posts, read 15,302,626 times
Reputation: 6658
Quote:
Originally Posted by grimace8 View Post
one thing i never understood. why are baserunners allowed to over-run first base (and of course home plate too, but that's a non-issue; i'm just pointing out the similarity) but runners are not allowed to over-run second base and third base?
Simply because someone decided that that was the rule.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lancet71 View Post
If you overrun any other base excluding 1st, you are actually going in the direction of the next base. Going straight up the first baseline or to the right does not shorten your distance to 2nd base.
That's not true.

Assuming that the basepaths are a true square, then the shortest distance between any two bases is a right angle. Over running any base increases the distance to the next base.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Baseball
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:14 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top