U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Baseball
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-20-2016, 03:57 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
743 posts, read 680,495 times
Reputation: 1577

Advertisements

I can't find it anywhere ... Can anybody provide me with a breakdown of the league by race? I'm guessing Spanish speaking players make up at least 50%.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-20-2016, 05:17 PM
 
Location: Currently living in Reddit
5,655 posts, read 6,259,332 times
Reputation: 7309
From Manfred's 2015 report:

Latin players: 29.3%
American blacks: 8.3%
Asian: 1.2%
Caucasian: 58.8%
Other? (unaccounted for to make 100%): 2.4%

Quote:
25-Man Major League rosters
• 2015 Opening Day, the number of players from the 25-Man Major League rosters who identified themselves as African-American or Black was approximately 8.3 percent, which was an increase from 8.2 percent in 2014. The first round of the 2014 First-Year Player Draft featured the selections of five African-American players (five-of-34, 14.7 percent). African-American players accounted for 12 of the 73 selections that were made on the first day of the 2014 MLB draft.
• The percentage of Latino players increased from 28.4 percent in 2014 to 29.3 percent on 2015 opening day rosters.
• The percentage of Asian players decreased from two percent in 2014 to 1.2 percent in 2015.
• The percentage of white players decreased from 60.9 percent in 2014 to 58.8 percent in 2015.
So it doesn't seem like 2016 will be anywhere near 50% Latino.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2016, 05:50 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
743 posts, read 680,495 times
Reputation: 1577
Quote:
Originally Posted by sskink View Post
From Manfred's 2015 report:

Latin players: 29.3%
American blacks: 8.3%
Asian: 1.2%
Caucasian: 58.8%
Other? (unaccounted for to make 100%): 2.4%



So it doesn't seem like 2016 will be anywhere near 50% Latino.
Thank you. It just doesn't seem like white players outnumber Hispanic players 2:1.
And I believe you can count the number of black pitchers on one hand ... I think at one point in the '70's black players hit a high water mark of 38%.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2016, 07:02 AM
 
Location: Cleveland, OH
10,122 posts, read 9,703,528 times
Reputation: 9293
Quote:
Originally Posted by sskink View Post


So it doesn't seem like 2016 will be anywhere near 50% Latino.
I think this is people's perception because there are far more than say 20 years ago, but yeah I don't see that happening soon.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2018, 09:35 PM
 
1 posts, read 22,821 times
Reputation: 11
[url]https://sabr.org/bioproj/topic/baseball-demographics-1947-2012[/url] is a great site for MLB demographics.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2018, 08:43 PM
Status: ""Wokesters" put the "poop" in the word "nincompoop"" (set 25 days ago)
 
Location: Nescopeck, Penna. (birthplace)
15,334 posts, read 9,387,619 times
Reputation: 19574
The changing flow of MLB demographics over the years can be explained primarily by economic pressures, and little else. Escape from poverty, and later, the pursuit of serious wealth, has always been a primary driving factor, and the rapid advance in assimilation of fast-growing Afro-American middle and professional classes accounts for the peaking of black participation after 1980. And the success of the Latin baseball academies in recent years is surely driven by the emergence of globalization.

It should also be recognized that the notorious reserve clause was little more than an agreement in restraint of trade, one specifically legitimized by a political argument that without it, a handful of major-market franchises would dominate; ironically, the invalidation of the clause by the Supreme Court pretty closely paralleled the reduction of dominance in the American League by the often-cited New York Yankees.

Last edited by 2nd trick op; 01-26-2018 at 08:57 PM..
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2019, 09:38 PM
 
Location: Mogadishu, MN
9,563 posts, read 2,814,650 times
Reputation: 6439
Quote:
Originally Posted by sskink View Post
From Manfred's 2015 report:

Latin players: 29.3%
American blacks: 8.3%
Asian: 1.2%
Caucasian: 58.8%
Other? (unaccounted for to make 100%): 2.4%



So it doesn't seem like 2016 will be anywhere near 50% Latino.
You wouldn't know this from look at the Fox analysts after the games. 1 white, the rest are black or Hispanic. Social engineering is subtle (to most people).
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2019, 10:05 PM
 
3,382 posts, read 3,838,956 times
Reputation: 2855
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kavalier View Post
You wouldn't know this from look at the Fox analysts after the games. 1 white, the rest are black or Hispanic. Social engineering is subtle (to most people).
Is the white guy even considered an analyst? I'm not sure what the position is actually called but in most shows like this they always have somebody that goes to school for the job then the people who actually played the sport.

Even on MLB Network they have 1 guy who has been only in the media then former players.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-12-2019, 10:15 PM
 
Location: Mogadishu, MN
9,563 posts, read 2,814,650 times
Reputation: 6439
Quote:
Originally Posted by Statz2k10 View Post
Is the white guy even considered an analyst? I'm not sure what the position is actually called but in most shows like this they always have somebody that goes to school for the job then the people who actually played the sport.

Even on MLB Network they have 1 guy who has been only in the media then former players.
All the networks (TBS as well) have taken it upon themselves to make their analysts reflect anything BUT the makeup of the game. It is social engineering.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2019, 07:36 PM
 
330 posts, read 118,534 times
Reputation: 984
Gary Sheffield and David Ortiz are awful.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Baseball

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2021, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top