Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Basketball
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-22-2013, 07:36 PM
 
1,420 posts, read 3,184,903 times
Reputation: 2257

Advertisements

Consider the best college teams of the past couple years. Could they beat the best NBA Team from 50 years ago? Forty years ago? Thirty years ago?

How far back would you have to go to produce a fairly even matchup?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-23-2013, 01:44 AM
 
Location: Trumbull/Danbury
9,757 posts, read 7,468,918 times
Reputation: 4111
Never. They're pro's for a reason. Sure Kentucky might have 6 future NBA players on their roster, but everyone on Utah's roster is a pro no matter how bad they may be. I wish people would stop doing these "can the best college team beat the worst pro team" comparisions. The pro's on a completely different level than college is and no matter how good the college team was and how bad the pro team is, chances are extremely likely the pro team blows out the college team by at least 30 points.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2013, 07:36 AM
 
1,420 posts, read 3,184,903 times
Reputation: 2257
Quote:
Originally Posted by 7express View Post
Never.
So you think today's best college team would lose to the 1948 Baltimore Bullets?



Player Pos. Height Weight
Darrell Brown F 6'2" 175
Walter Budko F-C 6'5" 220
Johnny Ezersky F-G 6'3" 175
Doug Holcomb F 6'4" 200
Buddy Jeannette G 5'11" 175
Dan Kraus G 6'0" 195
Herb Krautblatt G 6'1" 190
Freddie Lewis F-G 6'2" 195
John Mahnken C 6'8" 220
Don Martin C-F 6'7" 210
Leo Mogus F-C 6'4" 190
Jake Pelkington C-F 6'6" 220
Howie Rader G-F 6'1" 190
Ray Ramsey G-F 6'2" 165
Chick Reiser G-F 5'11" 165
Connie Simmons C-F 6'8" 222
Stan Stutz G-F 5'10" 170
Sid Tanenbaum G 6'0" 160
Hal Tidrick F-G 6'1" 190
Jack Toomay C-F 6'6" 215
Irv Torgoff F 6'1" 192


Attached Thumbnails
Today's Best College Teams vs. Yesteryear's NBA Champions-balt.jpg  
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2013, 09:18 AM
 
Location: Miami/ Washington DC
4,836 posts, read 12,007,002 times
Reputation: 2600
I would say about 50 years maybe a bit more I think the best NCAA teams could beat the best NBA teams. The game as change a lot. Once you get into the 70s though the game is much more similar to have it is now. Also for those saying the 60s Celtics Bill Russell etc.. Yes Bill Russell is great, and would probably still be good even in todays NBA but these college teams would still be faster and bigger and then we have to put the 3pt shot into the equation. So we play with a 3pt or no 3pt? No 3pt I give the 60s teams advantage, 3pt I think the best, and only the best college teams have a shot.

But this can never happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2013, 09:31 AM
 
1,420 posts, read 3,184,903 times
Reputation: 2257
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyMIA View Post
I would say about 50 years maybe a bit more I think the best NCAA teams could beat the best NBA teams. The game as change a lot. Once you get into the 70s though the game is much more similar to have it is now. Also for those saying the 60s Celtics Bill Russell etc.. Yes Bill Russell is great, and would probably still be good even in todays NBA but these college teams would still be faster and bigger and then we have to put the 3pt shot into the equation. So we play with a 3pt or no 3pt? No 3pt I give the 60s teams advantage, 3pt I think the best, and only the best college teams have a shot.

But this can never happen.
That's the type of answer I was looking for - yes it is a hypothetical. But what it produces is discussion of about what the level of talent teams have today compared to an equivalent era's NBA team.

(Off topic, but I have to ask, anybody else having a problem accessing page 2 of their subscribed forums?)

Problems getting to page 2 of subscribed forums?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2013, 10:01 AM
 
34,254 posts, read 20,536,080 times
Reputation: 36245
I think it depends how the refs call the game. Hopefully the refs would call today's college team for carrying/palming the ball. I hate the way they get away with that nowadays. Also today's game is much more physical than yesteryear's ballgame.

Look at this ball handling about 12:30 to 12:42.


1 Kentucky vs 2 Kansas | 4/2/2012 | NCAA Men's Basketball National Championship Final - YouTube
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Basketball
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:16 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top