Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Basketball
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-17-2015, 01:16 PM
 
Location: spring tx
7,912 posts, read 10,081,853 times
Reputation: 1990

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
Here is Timmy carrying his team....blowing out the Lakers in game 6 on their own court to eliminate them from the playoffs.

San Antonio Spurs at Los Angeles Lakers Box Score, May 15, 2003 | Basketball-Reference.com

If you look through his box scores from that playoff run he has some absolutely enormous games and many where he lead his team in every statistical category including assists.
theres always game 6 2003 finals.

New Jersey Nets at San Antonio Spurs Box Score, June 15, 2003 | Basketball-Reference.com

he averaged 24ppg, 17rpg, 5apg, 1spg, 5.3 bpg in that finals series.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-17-2015, 01:56 PM
 
653 posts, read 781,048 times
Reputation: 854
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
It depends what you define as "best player".

I mean the guy is widely talked about around the league by analysts and writers as arguably the greatest PF of all time....and those guys are not Spurs loyalists.

To flat out say that Duncan shouldn't even be in consideration for best player since Jordan is grossly biased IMO.

So, where does Duncan fall short then? Can't be all-nba teams, mvps, championships or accumulated stats so what is it?
I agree. Anyone who claims that Duncan should not even be in the discussion is out of his mind. Timmy's per game numbers won't blow you away, but total stats over his career sure do!! And his per game averages aren't as impressive as Kobe's or McGrady or Iverson, but it's all a product of his willingness to play team ball. Kobe averaged 28 FGA per game during his 35ppg season. And again, that doesn't include his shot attempts where he was fouled and went to the line for 2.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2015, 02:41 PM
 
1,720 posts, read 1,303,388 times
Reputation: 1134
Quote:
Originally Posted by Natural510 View Post
I'd put it as Bryant>Duncan>James for now. Duncan is a great player, but never carried a team on his back like Kobe during his last two championships. With a must-win game on the line, there's no one you want with the ball in their hands for the last shot but Bryant.
When has Kobe ever carried his team to a championship? After Shaq left, the Lakers were a mediocre or slightly worse. Between 2004-2007 they were basically a .500 team who either didn't make the playoffs or were eliminated early. It wasn't until they got Pau Gasol and a couple other key players to compliment Kobe that they became championship contenders again. I think Lebron actually does more to carry his teams than Kobe.

It's easy to forget how dominant Duncan was during his prime (early 20s-early 30s). While he can't consistently carry the team anymore (though he does occasionally in the playoffs), he did frequently in his prime. During this period he carried the Spurs many times. If you look at his stats, his production doesn't really drop off until the 2009-2010 season when he was 35. There have been very few players who played at an elite level that late into their career.

NBA.com/Stats
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2015, 04:16 PM
 
Location: So California
8,704 posts, read 11,110,308 times
Reputation: 4794
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
It depends what you define as "best player".

I mean the guy is widely talked about around the league by analysts and writers as arguably the greatest PF of all time....and those guys are not Spurs loyalists.

To flat out say that Duncan shouldn't even be in consideration for best player since Jordan is grossly biased IMO.

So, where does Duncan fall short then? Can't be all-nba teams, mvps, championships or accumulated stats so what is it?

Best being dominant. I dont think he's top two post Jordan. Obviously he's in the discussion but more like #3-4, probably 3 with all things considered. Nothing to be ashamed of.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2015, 04:30 PM
 
1,720 posts, read 1,303,388 times
Reputation: 1134
Quote:
Originally Posted by slo1318 View Post
Best being dominant. I dont think he's top two post Jordan. Obviously he's in the discussion but more like #3-4, probably 3 with all things considered. Nothing to be ashamed of.
To me best means does the most to help the team win. I'm not saying Kobe and Shaq didn't, but Duncan is more about overall team-play and winning than the two egomaniacs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-17-2015, 10:29 PM
 
Location: So California
8,704 posts, read 11,110,308 times
Reputation: 4794
Quote:
Originally Posted by PanapolicRiddle View Post
To me best means does the most to help the team win. I'm not saying Kobe and Shaq didn't, but Duncan is more about overall team-play and winning than the two egomaniacs.

Only because you are a Duncan fan. Is he as good a scorer as either of them? No. Is he as dominant as Shaq? No. Kobe? No. Where is he better? Longevity? Ok, but that doesnt make him the best. It makes him Cal Ripken or Bret Favre..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2015, 09:20 AM
 
Location: Austin, Texas
3,092 posts, read 4,966,540 times
Reputation: 3186
Quote:
Originally Posted by Natural510 View Post
I'd put it as Bryant>Duncan>James for now. Duncan is a great player, but never carried a team on his back like Kobe during his last two championships. With a must-win game on the line, there's no one you want with the ball in their hands for the last shot but Bryant.
Never carried a team? How old are you? 15? Duncan absolutely carried those early 2000s teams. In 2003 he dragged David Robinson's corpse, 20 year old Parker (who was getting benched for Speedy Claxton late in games) and NBA newcomer Manu to a title. Re-watch game six of the Lakers series and how he absolutely dominated Shaq. Watch game 6 of the finals where he damn near had a quadruple double.

Way too many people on this forum make baseless statements without doing the proper education.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2015, 01:10 PM
 
1,720 posts, read 1,303,388 times
Reputation: 1134
Quote:
Originally Posted by slo1318 View Post
Only because you are a Duncan fan. Is he as good a scorer as either of them? No. Is he as dominant as Shaq? No. Kobe? No. Where is he better? Longevity? Ok, but that doesnt make him the best. It makes him Cal Ripken or Bret Favre..
Compared to Shaq, Duncan is a better defender, passer, and shooter, and about as good a rebounder. When Shaq was more than 10' away from the basket he was usually pretty useless. Duncan can actually pass from the top of the key, whereas Shaq made obvious passes to shooters from the key. The only advantage Shaq has is individual scoring; Duncan is better or as good in every other facet of the game.

Kobe is certainly a better individual scorer, but Duncan is a better rebounder and passer. Defensively they're probably about even, though Duncan is an interior defender while Kobe is perimeter, so we can't really compare apples-to-apples in that area.

I think an argument can be made that Duncan and Kobe are about equally good, but very different players. But in terms of actual skill Duncan is better than Shaq. Shaq basically just steamrolled other players with size and strength, while Duncan in his prime was a beautiful combination of fundamental acumen and athleticism. He also never let himself go physically the way Shaq did at times.

I think someone else might have already posted this, but it's worth another look: Game 6 highlights of the 2003 Western Conference Semis. Shaq and Duncan both had great games, but compare the two. Duncan scores in a wide variety of ways, while pretty much all Shaq's points are in the paint. Duncan's superior passing skills are also evident. Sorry, but anyone who can't see that Duncan is better is missing something:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rR6AgYWdoBQ

Quote:
Originally Posted by UTHORNS96 View Post
Never carried a team? How old are you? 15? Duncan absolutely carried those early 2000s teams. In 2003 he dragged David Robinson's corpse, 20 year old Parker (who was getting benched for Speedy Claxton late in games) and NBA newcomer Manu to a title. Re-watch game six of the Lakers series and how he absolutely dominated Shaq. Watch game 6 of the finals where he damn near had a quadruple double.

Way too many people on this forum make baseless statements without doing the proper education.
That's exactly the problem. Many posters are only thinking of the Duncan over the last few seasons. He had several monster games during mid to late 20s peak. I don't think Shaq ever played as well as Duncan did during game 6 against the Nets.

Last edited by PanapolicRiddle; 07-18-2015 at 01:48 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2015, 02:00 PM
 
78,326 posts, read 60,517,579 times
Reputation: 49617
Quote:
Originally Posted by slo1318 View Post
Only because you are a Duncan fan. Is he as good a scorer as either of them? No. Is he as dominant as Shaq? No. Kobe? No. Where is he better? Longevity? Ok, but that doesnt make him the best. It makes him Cal Ripken or Bret Favre..
He sure beat the crap out of Shaquille and Kobe on their own court to knock them out of the playoffs in the box score I linked to and there are many more like that.

He was dominant in that he did everything great.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-19-2015, 10:26 AM
 
1,720 posts, read 1,303,388 times
Reputation: 1134
Duncan is also a much better ball-handler than Shaq. He doesn't do it much anymore, but during his prime he would often lead the fast break after grabbing a board. How many other 7' 270 pd players were ever capable of doing that? I can't think of any right off hand, and Shaq certainly wasn't.

So Duncan is a better defender, passer, shooter, and ball-handler than Shaq. In terms of individual scoring in the paint Shaq was more dominant, but Duncan is better in every other facet of the game. Does this effectively explain why Duncan is better overall?

Last edited by PanapolicRiddle; 07-19-2015 at 10:42 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Basketball

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:49 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top