U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Books
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
 
 
Old 05-13-2010, 10:16 AM
 
7,163 posts, read 7,248,494 times
Reputation: 10089
Has anyone else read Dead in the Family? Frankly, I just didn't think it was very good. It felt like Charlaine Harris had a deadline to meet and just slapped something on a page. There were several plots and subplots, but no main story line. She introduced new characters for no particular reason. Sookie would be scared and miserable in one scene and perky in the next. Don't want to discuss any spoiler information, but at least one major plot line was introduced and never followed up.

Anyway, anyone else have an opinion?
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-24-2011, 05:49 PM
 
Location: Maine
7,971 posts, read 10,167,431 times
Reputation: 6505
I'm reading the first book for the first time, and I have to say: The TV series is far superior in every way. The TV show develops characters, makes you care about them (both good and bad), and focuses on a wide array of characters. The book is all plot, no character.

Do they get better, or if I don't like the first one am I guaranteed to dislike the rest?
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2011, 07:54 PM
 
2,030 posts, read 2,679,104 times
Reputation: 3761
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark S. View Post
Do they get better, or if I don't like the first one am I guaranteed to dislike the rest?
I never could get into the first one -- I STILL haven't read it (or #2) -- even though I've read 3-10. I do think they get better, but I'm not sure character development is a mainstay of the series. They definitely seem more focused on the plot.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2011, 08:29 AM
 
Location: Pittsburgh
12,395 posts, read 9,368,610 times
Reputation: 18665
I read the books before the show came out, and I couldn't put them down. You're starting out comparing the two, which is always going to be disappointing. The thing with the book series is that it's entirely from Sookie's perspective, so yes, it is going to be limited in that sense. But I think in all, because of the first-person narration the books are a lot warmer and funnier than True Blood, which focuses a lot on the darker aspects of sex and drugs and death.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2011, 07:27 PM
 
Location: Mostly in my head
15,926 posts, read 27,790,964 times
Reputation: 11559
The books (read them all) are much superior to the TV series. TV series always go for the shocker-scenes and if they aren't in the book, they create one. I quit watching after the first season b/c it was just so stupid.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2011, 07:49 PM
 
Location: Maine
7,971 posts, read 10,167,431 times
Reputation: 6505
Quote:
Originally Posted by fleetiebelle View Post
The thing with the book series is that it's entirely from Sookie's perspective, so yes, it is going to be limited in that sense. But I think in all, because of the first-person narration the books are a lot warmer and funnier than True Blood, which focuses a lot on the darker aspects of sex and drugs and death.
I think the first person narrative is a large part of why I just can't get into the book. It limits the entire viewpoint to Sookie, and she just isn't that interesting. I feel no emotional connection to her whatsoever, because the prose tends toward "just the facts," with little access to the characters' thoughts and emotions.

My big complaint with the TV show is that so many scenes exist solely to titillate. They don't advance plot or character. It's just a chance to put skin on the screen. Some scenes (especially in the first season) are nothing more than soft core porn.

But at least with the TV show there is an emotional connection with the characters, and the story manages to involve all the characters and their own personal struggles. The book just doesn't do that. The narrative is "this happened, that happened" ... all plot, no character.

I was hoping that this was simply the case with the first book, and later books would become more interesting.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2011, 11:47 AM
 
42 posts, read 46,224 times
Reputation: 48
I have the book series on my Kindle and so far I have only read 3 books. There are some things that I like better in the books than I do in the TV series.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2011, 05:04 AM
 
Location: Michigan
848 posts, read 1,235,708 times
Reputation: 439
So if you compare these Books to another book series would it be more like twilight, house of Night, morganville vampires..... ?
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-17-2011, 06:33 AM
 
5 posts, read 3,234 times
Reputation: 14
Reading books is fine better than watching
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:
Over $79,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Entertainment and Arts > Books

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2014, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 - Top