Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Colorado > Boulder area
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-04-2009, 01:55 PM
 
Location: Wherabouts Unknown!
7,841 posts, read 18,991,883 times
Reputation: 9586

Advertisements

Some Grand Junction ( elevation: 4593 ) homeowners plant Aspen trees in their yards. Most of them look very unhealthy. They don't seem like the happy Aspens along Kebler Pass Road ( forest road 12, connecting Crested Butte highway 135 with Paonia Reservoir and highway 133 )
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-04-2009, 02:14 PM
 
Location: Ned CO @ 8300'
2,075 posts, read 5,121,128 times
Reputation: 3049
Quote:
Originally Posted by CosmicWizard View Post
They don't seem like the happy Aspens along Kebler Pass Road ( forest road 12, connecting Crested Butte highway 135 with Paonia Reservoir and highway 133 )
One of my very favorite fall drives! Absolutely stunning.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2009, 07:38 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,694,120 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by DressageRider View Post
I have an aspen in my backyard and it is the most pathetic looking little creature. The just don't do well at lower altitudes.

But we also have walnut, oak, and elm, and they are wonderful.

My friends have cottonwood trees and the cotton that they shed seems like a bit of a pain in the butt.
Some cities require you to plant "cottonless" cottonwoods. Actually, this was an odd spring. We weren't much bothered by the cotton of the neighbors' trees this year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2009, 09:23 PM
 
Location: Denver
4,564 posts, read 10,951,541 times
Reputation: 3947
I wondering if it's because it's been so wet. The creek we live next to is lined with huge, huge old cottonwoods and usually it's a huge pain, but not much this year.

I've got mushrooms growing big time in the back yard because of all the rain!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2009, 09:29 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,694,120 times
Reputation: 35920
Something kept the cottonwoods from producing cotton. Our usually beautiful crab apple tree only had a few blossoms, too. In the case of our crab, I think it was b/c it got cold and froze after being warm enough for the tree to make buds.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2009, 01:45 AM
 
857 posts, read 1,732,388 times
Reputation: 186
Talking Boulder Smart Growth Infilling Devoid Of Trees

Quote:
Originally Posted by qfrost View Post
I also wondered whether there were some restrictions in the newer areas that prohibited planting trees, based off the number of areas I saw that were really devoid of anything but subdivision houses...
While I have absolutely no idea, it sure looks that way, especially around the 29th street mall area, a virtual wasteland with large shopping areas devoid of large trees, and intersecting 6 to 8 lane boulevards like Phoenix.

Similarly, the smart growth homes and townhouses in the north / northwest of town -- very little vegetation, just row after row of "townhomes."

There seems to have been very little effort made in SOME newer areas of Boulder to preserve the natural vegetation around new buildings, unlike similar cities such as Sedona, Durango, and Flagstaff.

Overall, Boulder is very artificial with a grid layout, and if the original poster wants natural vegetation with Ponderosa pine trees, oak scrub, and wildflowers on curving country roads, live outside the City limits in the foothills.

As a concept, Smart Growth involves theories that have yet to be proven by its critics, such as the theory that commute times will decrease.

In Boulder, they have increased, since infilling has brought more cars and more traffic. Even critics of smart growth like infilling, because it brings in cheaper housing! But one has to accommodate the traffic somehow with tunnels or more expressways.

And, gravelscaping increases evaporation, transpiration, and wind, thereby increasing winter heating and summer cooling costs.

Therefore, implementing principles of smart growth in any given city is potentially unsustainable over the long run.

My own view is that Boulder would look nicer by eliminating the sharp urban growth boundary, and instead, having a gradual transition zone between dense urbanization and farmland. In this scenario, there would be a nice row of trees between the townhomes in North Boulder and the Forest Service office area.

Of course, much of this is merely one's own personal aesthetic preferences. Urban planners never agree with each other :-) Sometime I'll post photos of the Durango Wallmart parking lot and greenbelt, and you'll see what Boulder's 29th street mall COULD look like w/ grass mounds and purple leafed trees!

Last edited by CCCVDUR; 06-05-2009 at 02:43 AM.. Reason: Urban Planners Rule The World
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2009, 02:03 AM
 
857 posts, read 1,732,388 times
Reputation: 186
Quote:
Originally Posted by CosmicWizard View Post
Katiana wrote:
Big hardwood trees are not native to Colorado.
There are some really big old Cottonwood trees along the Colorado river in Grand Junction. I've also seen the big old Cottonwooods along other rivers in Colorado. As far as I know the Cottonwoods are native to Colorado.
Much of this comes down to one's own individual preferences, as is the case within the entire field of urban planning. Cottonwoods, Box Elders, Aspens, and MANY other hardwoods are indeed native, as are Ponderosa Pines. However, looking around Boulder, it seems that gravelscaping has replaced replanting native vegetation in some areas of town. I am no fan of gravelscaping (xeriscaping) and it's partner (smart growth). Same story in Albuquerque, where gravelscaping is even more ubiquitous than in Boulder. Infilling doesn't look that nice when there are no trees around the 4 story condos.

I would suggest doing what they do in Flagstaff: preserve the PondeBullBoxer31 and other trees around new homes and office buildings. Look at the Arbors Apartments in Flagstaff, or any other development in the Woodlands Village area of town as an example -- all the Ponderosa Pines were preserved before and during construction.

Everyone in urban planning in the great southwest mountain towns can learn from what other cities are doing. We can create better and more beautiful communities w/ increasing economic growth. New Properties that preserve large trees can be sold for more money and generate more tax revenue

Last edited by CCCVDUR; 06-05-2009 at 02:15 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2009, 08:02 AM
 
Location: Wherabouts Unknown!
7,841 posts, read 18,991,883 times
Reputation: 9586
Default Big old Cottonwood tree!

I drive by this big old Cottonwood to and from work every day. It's a grand old tree!

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2009, 10:00 AM
 
670 posts, read 1,172,114 times
Reputation: 1764
Default : (

Xeriscaping is a necessity. Boulder is a semi-arid environment and does not have an endless water supply! (smacks head)! I would have thought, with all of your research that you would know that. (confused)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-05-2009, 10:36 AM
 
Location: Old Town Longmont
377 posts, read 1,054,114 times
Reputation: 419
Xeriscaping is not gravelscaping, and as Hipchik stated it is essential in Colorado. It can also look lush and wonderful and is perfectly suited to the region.

29th Street Mall is... what... 2 years old? It will take a while for the trees to grow.

Katiana - Thanks for mentioning your crabapple! Mine barely bloomed this year too and I thought it was probably my fault. It is usually so beautiful. I wonder if it will produce apples this year?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Colorado > Boulder area

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top