U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > Buffalo area
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Get a detailed profile
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply


 
Old 06-23-2009, 11:49 AM
Not a member
 
Join Date: May 2008
1,518 posts, read 556,693 times
Reputation: 348
Canerican is a jewel in the roughCanerican is a jewel in the roughCanerican is a jewel in the roughCanerican is a jewel in the roughCanerican is a jewel in the roughCanerican is a jewel in the roughCanerican is a jewel in the rough
Massena area, and I loved it there. BTW Obama won St. Lawrence county, it is fairly Liberal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-29-2009, 05:42 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
155 posts, read 135,988 times
Reputation: 22
Coraggio is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ahat31 View Post
Thank you for sharing your recent experience with me. It sounds like your family just went through the same experiences mine will soon. It is annoying that the media only focuses on the negative. I have to say, I was shocked, I mean SHOCKED to see how high the taxes are in the state. We traveled through an area of Buffalo that was by the water, not sure the exact area, and was shocked to see how unclean it was.
Possibly Black Rock/Riverside? It has never failed to amaze me that in most other cities, waterfront property goes for a premium, whereas here, the neighborhood so close to the river is in such bad shape. Probably because some genius decided the river section of the Thruway should separate the homes from the water...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2009, 10:17 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buffalo NY
332 posts, read 140,543 times
Reputation: 75
Checkered24 will become famous soon enoughCheckered24 will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coraggio View Post
Possibly Black Rock/Riverside? It has never failed to amaze me that in most other cities, waterfront property goes for a premium, whereas here, the neighborhood so close to the river is in such bad shape. Probably because some genius decided the river section of the Thruway should separate the homes from the water...
That is a big problem. There technically is no waterfront property. It's all thruway, and people do not tend to pay big money for property overlooking a thruway.

About 20 years ago, there was a plan to move the 190 inland, along a railway right of way, to free up a good chunk of the waterfront. It got shot down as too pricey.

Then again, our outer harbor has been an empty brownfield for 50 years, and there is no thruway to use as an excuse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2009, 11:00 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
366 posts, read 173,745 times
Reputation: 113
mycrows will become famous soon enoughmycrows will become famous soon enoughmycrows will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Checkered24 View Post
About 20 years ago, there was a plan to move the 190 inland, along a railway right of way, to free up a good chunk of the waterfront. It got shot down as too pricey.
I don't remember the discussion from 20 years ago but this was talked about again recently in the context of the Ambassador bridge proposal (which was to be at the IRR). You can easily see the railroad ROW that Checkered24 is referring to on Google's satellite map. It runs north from roughly the interchange of 190 and the Scajaquada. Unfortunately, while this plan would reunite Riverside and Black Rock with the river, the more densely populated west side to the south would remain cut off from the riverfront. I'd be for doing this, of course, but I seriously doubt it will ever happen.

Here in Buffalo we know all too well how hard it is to get rid of a highway once we have it no matter how debilitating and ugly it is (cough Skyway cough). I was reading recently on the Syracuse forum that they might eliminate a portion of I-81 in downtown (a major highway that bisects the city from north to south). I wish them the best of the luck with that, it's an elevated highway that runs right through the central business district: it could be an even bigger eye sore than the 190. The advantage that they have is that the elevated portion of that highway is disintegrating, it's going to have to come down one way or another, and the cheapest way to deal with the problem would be to replace it with a boulevard. I'm sure a lot of people are familiar with a similar scenario that happened in San Francisco. A highway was damaged by an earthquake and had to be removed, creating room for a new and highly successful development zone. Unfortunately, while the 190 is not in the best of shape, it doesn't seem to be literally falling apart, so I guess we're stuck with it for now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > Buffalo area

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:40 PM.

Copyright © 2005-2009, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top