Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Business
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-08-2013, 11:47 AM
 
Location: Chicago
3,920 posts, read 6,833,898 times
Reputation: 5481

Advertisements

American International Group, the insurer rescued by the U.S. government in 2008 with a bailout that ultimately totaled $182 billion, may now join a lawsuit against the government alleging the terms of the deal were unfair, the company told Reuters news service Tuesday.

All the while broadcasting a commercial to the public with the tag line "Thank you America".


What do you think?!

AIG may join bailout lawsuit against Uncle Sam
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-08-2013, 12:19 PM
 
7,372 posts, read 14,677,220 times
Reputation: 7045
They knew the terms and what it meant for the future. They chose to ignore it though because they wanted the money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2013, 01:41 PM
 
Location: Chicago
3,920 posts, read 6,833,898 times
Reputation: 5481
Quote:
Originally Posted by skel1977 View Post
They knew the terms and what it meant for the future. They chose to ignore it though because they wanted the money.
Actually they didn't because a lot of the money the US government made was made through stocks it received in AIG. Since the stock did well the government did too. Now they are crying wolf for the profits the US raked in.

Its ridiculous though to say the least. The fact that the US government was even able to invest our tax dollars are absurd. Now AIG doesn't want us to profit from that investment. How do taxpayers win?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2013, 09:41 PM
 
1,696 posts, read 4,348,456 times
Reputation: 3931
It's a half-truth that all these companies that got bailouts paid the money back (referencing the AIG ad). Even though on paper it may seem as though the U.S. government got back the money they gave out, that doesn't mean the government and more importantly the People were made whole. Every penny of the bailout had to be borrowed and consequently interest had to be paid on it. Additionally the economic conditions created by the actions of AIG and the Wall St. banks led to massive increases in unemployment (which cost the gov't money in benefits and lost tax revenue) and a recession (which led to reduced tax revenue and a devaluing of the currency).

Perhaps the worst consequence of the bailouts was the moral hazard that was created. The basis of AIG's lawsuit is for the most part that as part of the terms of the bailout the well connected Wall St. firms were to be paid back 100% of the money that was "owed" them, when in a normal bankruptcy situation those firms would have had to get in line with everyone else as AIG went through bankruptcy. The 182 billion dollars was not only a bailout of AIG but also a stealth bailout of major Wall St. firms like Goldman Sachs. It is Hank Greenberg's contention that the shareholders of AIG, including himself, would have been better off if the government had structured the bailout differently instead of just taking care of the well connected Wall Streeters. Because of the fact that these major players were not allowed to fail and then be replaced by more solvent market participants, a large portion of the economy is now devoted to making sure these firms stay alive at everyone else's expense. That's why we have 0% interest rates coming from the Fed. and millions of baby boomers unable to move their money into "safe" investments like bonds and still get a reasonable return. Instead they have to invest their money in riskier assets meaning that once again we're being set up for another colossal failure when these bets go south. I'm pretty sure AIG did not figure those costs of the bailout into their calculation that everything is paid back.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2013, 04:05 PM
 
28,895 posts, read 54,147,443 times
Reputation: 46680
In other news:

"Man recovering from near-fatal heart attack sues EMT who successfully administered CPR. Claims broken ribs resulted."

"Family sues local fire department for damages to carpet after successfully extinguishing large house fire."

"Owner of sunken yacht sues rescuer because thrown life ring conked him, causing large bruise on forehead."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Business

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:05 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top