U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Business, Finance, and Investing > Business
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Get a detailed profile
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply


 
Old 11-13-2007, 03:24 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
520 posts, read 405,424 times
Reputation: 164
aaauger has a spectacular aura aboutaaauger has a spectacular aura aboutaaauger has a spectacular aura aboutaaauger has a spectacular aura about
We offered the other property a parking space rental agreement - along with small fee for pavement maintenance and liability insurance. They refused - school yard bully mentality.

But I think I found the answer for easements in an excellent document by Texas A&M. The other owner's case for prescriptive easement fails on several counts (like exclusive use by the trespassing tenants). A case for landlocked easement fails because the other property has 2 of its own entrances.

http://72.14.253.104/search?q=cache:B2Wn8W15YwQJ:recenter.tamu.edu/pdf/422.pdf+prescriptive+easement+requirements+texas&h l=en&ct=clnk&cd=2&gl=
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-13-2007, 04:28 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: West Columbia Gorge PNW
2,860 posts, read 2,624,642 times
Reputation: 1064
StealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud ofStealthRabbit has much to be proud of
Our similar parking lot has been an ongoing issue...

best to have it well posted, stickers, and patrolled a by towing company. Try to remove your personal need to mitigate for your parking folks or the offenders. When you do show up, don't act as owner, but as an agent of such. And do have some Hold Harmless liability agreements with those paying to park there

Adjacent property will not be able to force you into an easement if they are not landlocked, and even then it is not trivial. You have rights !! surprise! !
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2007, 07:13 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
520 posts, read 405,424 times
Reputation: 164
aaauger has a spectacular aura aboutaaauger has a spectacular aura aboutaaauger has a spectacular aura aboutaaauger has a spectacular aura about
The trespassers would have us believe otherwise. They're making claims of "common property" and threatening to block a fence permit.

Also, based on what I've read and based on the other property owner's uncooperative stance, he'll probably file suit for an easement regardless. (According to the zoning department, his property has far too few parking spaces for the amount of tenants present.) Does anyone know if we can counter-sue for our court costs and time if we're dragged into court?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2007, 04:51 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
3,135 posts, read 3,522,678 times
Reputation: 1647
sunsprit has a brilliant futuresunsprit has a brilliant futuresunsprit has a brilliant futuresunsprit has a brilliant futuresunsprit has a brilliant futuresunsprit has a brilliant futuresunsprit has a brilliant futuresunsprit has a brilliant futuresunsprit has a brilliant futuresunsprit has a brilliant futuresunsprit has a brilliant futuresunsprit has a brilliant futuresunsprit has a brilliant futuresunsprit has a brilliant futuresunsprit has a brilliant futuresunsprit has a brilliant futuresunsprit has a brilliant futuresunsprit has a brilliant futuresunsprit has a brilliant futuresunsprit has a brilliant futuresunsprit has a brilliant futuresunsprit has a brilliant futuresunsprit has a brilliant future
You can sue for anything you want, such as lost time, court costs, attorney fees, etc ... but don't count on being awarded these by the court, even if you're upheld and the other folks lose their challenge to your property rights.

If the parking lot area associated with your building is yours by survey and deed without an easement, then you have every right to do what is needed to protect your interests and the quiet enjoyment of their leases by the tenants. I'm the type of guy who'd be installing concrete traffic control dividers in the AM.

Your neighbor can bully and bluff all he wants, but he's the one with the inadequate parking and access to his building, and it's his problem. Not yours. If he wishes to have access and use of your property ... for which you pay the costs of ownership, taxes, and insurance ... then, if you so choose, you could lease or rent him a suitable access and use. If he wants it for free, then you have every right to have your property patrolled and remove his obstructing vehicles parked in the way of the commercial use of your building by your tenants.

Absent a pre-existing easement, and the fact that you've brought his unwelcome use of your property to his attention and asked him to stop ... would be much in your favor that he's not welcome to use your property to his benefit or assume an easement by historical use. It's not grounds for him to now demand an easement. Oh, BTW ... private easements aren't free, they're purchased. So, has he (or a prior property owner there) paid for an easement?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2007, 07:45 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
520 posts, read 405,424 times
Reputation: 164
aaauger has a spectacular aura aboutaaauger has a spectacular aura aboutaaauger has a spectacular aura aboutaaauger has a spectacular aura about
No - there are no easements on the deed, no easement agreements in writing. He appears to be operating under the impression that he can get the courts to grant him permission to use our property.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2007, 11:42 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
237 posts, read 211,703 times
Reputation: 87
suzeeq521 will become famous soon enoughsuzeeq521 will become famous soon enough
I would caution you to research the ordinances in your area before towing anyone. Where I live, it is perfectly legal to tow a tresspasser - as long as you have registered with the city to let them know you intend to tow trespassers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2007, 12:10 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
520 posts, read 405,424 times
Reputation: 164
aaauger has a spectacular aura aboutaaauger has a spectacular aura aboutaaauger has a spectacular aura aboutaaauger has a spectacular aura about
Absolutely good advice. I contacted the Austin police department who directed me to an Internet non profit site: texastowingcompliance.com.

The gist is that if someone can claim that you towed them with inadequate notice, you're liable. And even having the wrong sign (colors, fonts, layout) can constitute inadequate notice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2007, 11:50 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: WA
2,273 posts, read 2,808,255 times
Reputation: 679
cdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to beholdcdelena is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaauger View Post
There's currently no easement on the deed. However, we're concerned that the owner of the other building (who is uncooperative) will try to get an easement (necessity, prescriptive) through legal action if we erect any kind of barrier. Any ideas on how easy / hard it is to get an easement on someone else's property?
Some places easy, some hard, but the important point is that if one is granted you can be on the defense forever. Spend the money to fight any attempt at an easement or right-of-way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2007, 08:38 PM
If you refuse to use your brain
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Heartland
6,708 posts, read 4,315,197 times
Blog Entries: 1
Reputation: 7704
Tek_Freek has a reputation beyond reputeTek_Freek has a reputation beyond reputeTek_Freek has a reputation beyond reputeTek_Freek has a reputation beyond repute
Tek_Freek has a reputation beyond reputeTek_Freek has a reputation beyond reputeTek_Freek has a reputation beyond reputeTek_Freek has a reputation beyond reputeTek_Freek has a reputation beyond reputeTek_Freek has a reputation beyond reputeTek_Freek has a reputation beyond reputeTek_Freek has a reputation beyond reputeTek_Freek has a reputation beyond reputeTek_Freek has a reputation beyond repute
I visit a number of forums and I must say that this thread contains some of the best advice I've come across, founded on good, solid law and common sense.

I doff my hat to you all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-17-2007, 11:33 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Charleston, SC
1,839 posts, read 1,328,203 times
Reputation: 644
emilybh is a name known to allemilybh is a name known to allemilybh is a name known to allemilybh is a name known to allemilybh is a name known to allemilybh is a name known to allemilybh is a name known to allemilybh is a name known to allemilybh is a name known to allemilybh is a name known to allemilybh is a name known to allemilybh is a name known to all
I've been through this myself and what you need to do is A) get your property surveyed so you know EXACTLY where the property lines are. B) Brush up on the "adverse possession" laws in your state. If you find out that you do indeed own the property and file the survey with "land evidence" at your city hall, its considered a legal document and you'd have proof that you own the property.

You can protect your property by putting up "No Tresspassing signs" but the tresspassers can take them down as easily as you put them up. Another way you can protect your property is to give whoever is using it permission in writing and have them acknowledge it. That way a judge could never give them a prescriptive easement or rights to use your property (because you would have already given them permission).
One thing you don't want to do is not use the space yourself and let others continually and exclusively and visibly use it because THEN you could lose rights to it EVEN THOUGH in some states you may be paying taxes on it.

Here is how Wikipedia defines it:

[edit] Requirements for adverse possession

Adverse possession requires three elements in regards to the possession of the property[1]:
  1. physical: open and notorious (visible); actual; exclusive;
  2. mental: hostile;
  3. temporal: continuous (uninterrupted).
In simple terms, this means that those attempting to claim the property are occupying it exclusively (keeping out others) and openly as if it were their own. Some jurisdictions permit accidental adverse possession as might occur with a surveying error. Generally, the openly hostile possession must be continuous (although not necessarily constant) without challenge or permission from the lawful owner, for a fixed statutory period in order to acquire title. Where the property is of a type ordinarily only occupied during certain times (such as a summer cottage), the adverse possessor may only need to have exclusive, open, hostile possession during those successive useful periods, for the required number of years.

[edit] Effect of adverse possession

An adverse possessor will be committing a trespass on the property that they have taken and the owner of the property could cause them to be evicted by an action in trespass ("ejectment") or by bringing an action for possession. All common law jurisdictions require that the action of trespass is brought within a specified time, after which the true owner is assumed to have acquiesced. The effect of a failure by the land owner to evict the adverse possessor depends on the jurisdiction.
In some (such as England and Wales), the title of the landowner will be automatically extinguished once the relevant limitation period has passed. This process now only applies to unregistered land.
In other jurisdictions, the adverse possessor acquires merely an equitable title: the land owner being a trustee of the property for them.
Adverse possession only extends to the property adversely possessed. If the original owner had a title to a greater area (or volume) of property, the adverse possessor does not obtain all of it.
In some jurisdictions, a person who has successfully obtained title to property by adverse possession may (optionally) bring an action in land court to "quiet title" of record in their names on some or all of the former owner's property. Such action will make it simpler to convey the interest to others in a definitive manner, and also serves as notice that there is a new "owner" of record, which may be a pre-requisite to certain benefits (including equity loans, or judicial standing as an abutter). However, even if such action is not taken, the title is legally theirs, with most of the benefits and duties, including paying property taxes to avoid losing title to the tax collector. The effects of having a stranger to the title paying taxes on property may vary from one jurisdiction to another.
Adverse possession does not typically work against property owned by a government agency. However, there will be a more complicated analysis if private property were taken by eminent domain, control given to a private corporation (such as a railroad), then abandoned.
Where land is registered under a Torrens title registration system or similar, special rules apply. It may be that the land cannot be affected by adverse possession (as was the case in England and Wales from 1875 to 1926), or that special rules apply.
Adverse possession may also apply to territorial rights. In the United States, Georgia lost an island in the Savannah River to South Carolina, when that state used fill from dredging to attach the island to its own shore. Since Georgia knew of this yet did nothing about it, the U.S. Supreme Court (which has original jurisdiction in such matters) granted this land to South Carolina, even though the Treaty of Beaufort (1787) explicitly specified that the river's islands belonged to Georgia.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Business, Finance, and Investing > Business

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:38 AM.

Copyright © 2005-2009, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top