Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Business
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-18-2013, 05:22 PM
 
11 posts, read 21,557 times
Reputation: 12

Advertisements

My partner and I plan on starting a new business, the "Limited Liability Company" or LLC type. We plan on selling specialized software to other businesses and organizations. We have an option to file for LLC in the Washington state (where I live) or in California (San-Francisco area) where my partner lives.

Is there any benefit to filing for LLC in WA vs CA and vice versa?

I'd appreciate your insight on this!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-18-2013, 08:31 PM
 
Location: We_tside PNW (Columbia Gorge) / CO / SA TX / Thailand
34,690 posts, read 57,994,855 times
Reputation: 46171
1) Go talk to SCORE or SBDC (develop a revenue and Business costs estimate good enough to run income tax scenerio)
2) Run Scenerio in each state.
3) Validate with BUSINESS accountant (knowledgeable to business filing in each state).


Run 3, 5 and 10 yr scenerios.


I can't imagine WA not being the best choice, especially for a company with LOW capital equip needs. (subject to WADOR Personal Property Taxes). Don't forget your GROSS reciepts are taxable as WA B&O. (You can have negative business net return and still own WA B&O)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-18-2013, 11:37 PM
 
Location: Vallejo
21,831 posts, read 25,102,289 times
Reputation: 19060
Uh, depends

My profit margin is about 75% (self-employed, I do most most of my own work so very high profit margin since it's my labor generating the profit). WA (Seattle) B&O is 1.8%, equivalent to 1.8%/.75 or 2.67% income tax. CA my effective income tax is 5%. I also pay a 2 mill (.2%) tax on gross receipts. Seattle would clearly be better.

Now flip it.
Instead of doing my work, I'm an agency. Say I have a pool of ten contractors who work exclusively for me who each gross $100k per year. Standard split is 70/30, so I'm grossing $1.43 million per year and $1 million goes right out the door. I'm left with $430k. Then I have to rent an office $60,000/yr. Two office staff ($160k). Production (printing) costs $50,000/year. I'm left with $160k, profit margin of about 11%.
1.8% BO/.11 = 16%. I'd be better off in California.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2013, 10:54 PM
 
9,470 posts, read 6,966,152 times
Reputation: 2177
Move to Wyoming, or somehow truly locate your business there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2013, 06:54 AM
 
28,895 posts, read 54,134,340 times
Reputation: 46680
Delaware.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Business

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top