U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Business
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-30-2019, 12:14 PM
 
Location: Silicon Valley
3,402 posts, read 1,495,152 times
Reputation: 5786

Advertisements

Even if it were true as represented, it's a drop in the bucket. Back when GM first made a billion dollars in a year, they employed 1.2M workers. When Google first did it, they were around 30,000.



Auto is the top of the food chain in manufacturing. The giant supply chain they hold up and in the US is staggering. I truly hope they are profitable and continue to be profitable. We need the domestics to be profitable.



Consider this. If this country stopped importing oil and everyone purchased domestic cars, it would be enough to even the trade deficit. If the return of supply chain components was enough to bring other industries back (think display screens yielding a return of monitor/tv production) this country could return to its golden age.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-30-2019, 12:33 PM
 
1,455 posts, read 671,134 times
Reputation: 2356
Quote:
Originally Posted by artillery77 View Post
Even if it were true as represented, it's a drop in the bucket. Back when GM first made a billion dollars in a year, they employed 1.2M workers. When Google first did it, they were around 30,000.



Auto is the top of the food chain in manufacturing. The giant supply chain they hold up and in the US is staggering. I truly hope they are profitable and continue to be profitable. We need the domestics to be profitable.



Consider this. If this country stopped importing oil and everyone purchased domestic cars, it would be enough to even the trade deficit. If the return of supply chain components was enough to bring other industries back (think display screens yielding a return of monitor/tv production) this country could return to its golden age.
Why would I buy a car from a company that doesn't make a vehicle I am interested in?

We won't stop importing oil, but we may export as much or more than we import. The imported oil is necessary for refineries that are optimized for the heavier crudes that come in from overseas. Contrary to popular belief, oil is not interchangeable. A refinery that's optimized for heavy crude doesn't do well with the light crudes the US produces these days.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2019, 12:33 PM
 
Location: NYC
12,380 posts, read 8,334,485 times
Reputation: 13566
GM is in so much debit, that a billion is nothing in terms of their pension requirements. They are like a state government, they've got so much liabilities that when the recession hits they were the 1st to go belly up when income drops.

During the recession how come Toyota, Honda did not go belly up?

The problem with today's economy is that companies are too leveraged and way too much outstanding liabilities that were deferred. Any ripple in the economy will require a bailout just to pay their bills.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2019, 12:48 PM
 
Location: Silicon Valley
3,402 posts, read 1,495,152 times
Reputation: 5786
Quote:
Originally Posted by WRM20 View Post
Why would I buy a car from a company that doesn't make a vehicle I am interested in?

Are you an American that believes in supporting America? We've got more than just GM.


Assembling a bunch of Japanese/German parts in the US is hardly a replacement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2019, 01:41 PM
 
Location: Aurora Denveralis
5,873 posts, read 2,072,590 times
Reputation: 9072
Quote:
Originally Posted by lollydoodoo View Post
GM has a right to make money.
Sure. So do the small circle of wealthy investors that already have buckets of the stuff - and that's who owns most of the IPO.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/.../lyft-ipo.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2019, 01:56 PM
 
27,813 posts, read 39,261,097 times
Reputation: 36058
Quote:
Originally Posted by easy62 View Post
But if it were Tesla everyone would be congratulating them but since itís GM then letís boohoo them.

Hoo boy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2019, 02:19 PM
 
Location: Metro Detroit Michigan
3,860 posts, read 1,096,893 times
Reputation: 3074
Quote:
Originally Posted by vision33r View Post
GM is in so much debit, that a billion is nothing in terms of their pension requirements. They are like a state government, they've got so much liabilities that when the recession hits they were the 1st to go belly up when income drops.

During the recession how come Toyota, Honda did not go belly up?

The problem with today's economy is that companies are too leveraged and way too much outstanding liabilities that were deferred. Any ripple in the economy will require a bailout just to pay their bills.
This is how Toyota stays out of trouble.

https://www.theoaklandpress.com/news...5136b9c28.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2019, 02:21 PM
 
Location: Aurora Denveralis
5,873 posts, read 2,072,590 times
Reputation: 9072
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tek_Freek View Post
Hoo boy.
I dunno, I think he has a point. That's the problem with companies that become darlings, from Apple to Google to Tesla to Uber: they can do no wrong and their corporate doo-doo piles smell like roses.

GM stopped being any kind of darling a long time ago, except with the blue chip crowd, so it's no surprise they can do nothing right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2019, 02:28 PM
 
4,427 posts, read 2,424,216 times
Reputation: 7858
Debt isn’t necessarily GMs problem it’s their cost structure... when the next recession hits they won’t be able to scale downward that much. Hence the exit from many plants and unproductive lines right now is wise. I’d suggest they can’t shrink their footprint fast enough.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-30-2019, 02:40 PM
 
27,813 posts, read 39,261,097 times
Reputation: 36058
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quietude View Post
I dunno, I think he has a point. That's the problem with companies that become darlings, from Apple to Google to Tesla to Uber: they can do no wrong and their corporate doo-doo piles smell like roses.

GM stopped being any kind of darling a long time ago, except with the blue chip crowd, so it's no surprise they can do nothing right.
And there is a large group that bash Tesla no matter what they do. They want them to fail so they can be proven correct. What a lousy attitude.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Business
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. | Please obey Forum Rules | Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top