U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Business, Finance, and Investing > Business
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Get a detailed profile
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply


 
Old 01-25-2009, 11:06 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
43 posts, read 33,442 times
Reputation: 24
Peripateticshutin is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by allforcats View Post
And MicroSofties being as resourceful as they usually are, it'll be no surprise five years from now to find that many new start-up companies will be traced back to today's news
While I think you meant well with this, it's a very glib and insensitive thing to say about someone else's job situation.

The tech market, unlike that of 10 years ago, is not going back to "anyone with an idea and a t-shirt logo gets venture capital." 99% of laid off tech workers would not go on to found their own company or anything that grandiose. In fact, they'd probably have to leave WA to find work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-25-2009, 01:31 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Marietta, GA
3,910 posts, read 1,927,493 times
Reputation: 1213
neil0311 has much to be proud ofneil0311 has much to be proud ofneil0311 has much to be proud ofneil0311 has much to be proud ofneil0311 has much to be proud ofneil0311 has much to be proud ofneil0311 has much to be proud ofneil0311 has much to be proud ofneil0311 has much to be proud ofneil0311 has much to be proud ofneil0311 has much to be proud ofneil0311 has much to be proud ofneil0311 has much to be proud ofneil0311 has much to be proud ofneil0311 has much to be proud ofneil0311 has much to be proud ofneil0311 has much to be proud ofneil0311 has much to be proud ofneil0311 has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by coldbliss View Post
Yeah, I just think Microsoft is the General Motors of the IT/software world.
One thing to keep in mind here is this game of expectations "gotcha" played by the stock market and so-called analysts, many of whom work for firms that are on the brink of extinction without huge taxpayer cash infusions. If I tell the market I will lose $0.50/share and only post a loss of $0.47, my stock will rise, as I have "beat expectations," although my company's finances are in lousy shape. If I have guided for a profit of $0.50/share and only post a profit of $0.47/share, then the market is dissapointed as I have not "met expectations", despite a huge profit on increased revenue.

While I understand the realities of the PC market and where things may go in the next year, here is the reality of this situation:

"Microsoft Corp. today announced revenue of $16.63 billion for the second quarter ended Dec. 31, 2008, a 2% increase over the same period of the prior year. Operating income, net income and diluted earnings per share for the quarter were $5.94 billion, $4.17 billion and $0.47, declines of 8%, 11% and 6%, respectively, compared with the prior year."

$16.63 Billion with a net income of $4.17 Billion...that's a 25% bottom line profit...hardly treading in GM territory. In fact, the revenue number was an increase from the previous year, although a small one. When you consider annual revenues of more than $60 Billion, the days of 10% or 15% increases in revenue year over year are just not reasonable or realistic. Of course the areas of "concern" for "the street" were the operating and income numbers, although MSFT is far from posting a net loss and nowhere near GM in terms of bleeding cash, being saddled by an unsustainable expense model, or needing infusions of tax money to keep the doors open.

I think your analogy is correct as to the size of the companies, but beyond that the comparison ends and the analogy is flawed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2009, 01:49 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Seattle area, via Phoenix, San Jose and Orange County
1,073 posts, read 1,015,594 times
Reputation: 261
MichaelinWA is a jewel in the roughMichaelinWA is a jewel in the roughMichaelinWA is a jewel in the roughMichaelinWA is a jewel in the roughMichaelinWA is a jewel in the roughMichaelinWA is a jewel in the rough
I know that AFC meant well. But you're right, these are horrible times for startup funding. Sadly, there just isn't anything positive to spin about the increasingly common and large job losses in the Puget Sound economy, at Microsoft or elsewhere.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peripateticshutin View Post
While I think you meant well with this, it's a very glib and insensitive thing to say about someone else's job situation.

The tech market, unlike that of 10 years ago, is not going back to "anyone with an idea and a t-shirt logo gets venture capital." 99% of laid off tech workers would not go on to found their own company or anything that grandiose. In fact, they'd probably have to leave WA to find work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Business, Finance, and Investing > Business

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:08 PM.

Copyright © 2005-2009, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top