Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-05-2011, 09:05 AM
 
2 posts, read 10,614 times
Reputation: 10

Advertisements

Thanks for the response Ultrarunner. I was able to go to the law library and found out that statute 1671 regarding late fees is still on the books. It looks like the burden of proof would be on the landlord to prove that she was extremely inconvenienced by my late rent.

She does not want to go to court, but I am leaning in that direction. I am going to write her asking once again about the money she owes me, and give her a date to respond. After that, I will then offer to accept a lesser amount in order to settle out of court. If she still refuses, I will then proceed with small claims court.

My question now is, if I lose the case, and end up having to pay her all the backed up late fees (which I will if a judge declares it to be legal), can she counter-sue me, and for what, if the legal fees are the only issue between us? She says she will counter sue if I take her to court.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-22-2011, 08:37 AM
 
1 posts, read 1,149 times
Reputation: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by DowntownVentura View Post
I assume this is California since it is in the California forum.

There are a lot of things wrong here.
1. It doesn't seem the landlord advised you on your right to a pre-inspection before you moved
2. The landlord waited too long to return your security deposit and/or provide a list of deposit deductions
3. The landlord did not prorate the carpet. You didn't indicate how long you were renting the unit but if it was more than a couple of years, you shouldn't have to pay anything for the carpet. If you lived there a shorter period of time, your proportion of the replacement cost would be very low.

Your recourse is small claims court. Read here California Tenants - California Department of Consumer Affairs for the law and here for the process to take when the law has been violated California Tenant Law - Non-profit legal advice for California renters' rights

I Just had something similar happen to me. We had an initial inspection (never written just a formal 24hr verbal request). We had agreed to make some repairs and our landlord required us to give her a list of companies to approve before we were to have them cleaned. We did and she said she would rather use another company that would charge the same rate. So we agreed verbally. Our contract ended on March 30, 2011@ 12p.m. Since then there was no corrospondance verbally, text or written/email. Then on April 21st we received the statement of itemized repairs which included her doing work on the house for 23 hours (not itemized what she did) and threw in a new pool pump at the cost of $1800+ with0out ever telling us that there was a problem with the pump. At the time of the initial inspection the pool was running and the pool was clean. We moved out of the house 1 week earlier because we rented another house and the contract started on March 25. So my question is this, am I suppose to receive the deposit/letter of itemized deduction by the 21st day or is she suppose to mail out the letter by the 21st day? She had the letter certified and mail out on April 20th. Does the clock start counting on the day the contract expired or the next day. So would day 1 be on the 30th when the contract was up or on the 31st? Any help would be appreciated
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2012, 04:24 PM
 
1 posts, read 887 times
Reputation: 10
I moved out of a rental property on July 1st, the landlord had people come over and look at the house the same day I was moving out, then he rented the property to the people that came over to look at the house on that day, now he want;s to charge me cleaning fees when the house was super clean and he was able to rent it with out doing anything to it; is that legal, also now he wants to deduct lat fees from my deposit.
Please advise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:12 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top