Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Are you in favor of motorcycle noise regulation?
Yes 39 72.22%
No 15 27.78%
Voters: 54. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-31-2010, 06:36 PM
 
Location: West LA
2,318 posts, read 7,819,271 times
Reputation: 1125

Advertisements

So, do you think the volume of motorcycle tailpipes are out of control? Should the government regulate this?




California Senate tells motorcyclists to pipe down

California Senate tells motorcyclists to pipe down | Greenspace | Los Angeles Times

"SB 435, also known as the Motorcycle Anti-Tampering Act, gives law enforcement officials the ability to cite noise pollution violations under the California Vehicle Code, reinforcing a 27-year-old federal regulation that is rarely enforced.

Under the proposed law, motorcyclists pulled over for other traffic violations could also be cited for illegally noisy exhaust pipes and fined $50 to $100 for a first violation -- a fix-it ticket that could be dismissed with a proof of correction. Subsequent offenses would result in fines of $100 to $250. The bill, which has also passed the Assembly, is headed for Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to sign. It would apply to motorcycles and after-market parts from the 2013 model year forward."

"According to the Air Resources Board, which backed the smog-check version of SB 435, motorcycles account for less than 1% of vehicle-miles traveled in the state yet account for 10% of passenger vehicles' smog-forming emissions; swapping a compliant tailpipe equipped with a catalytic converter for one without emissions controls can emit as many as 10 times more smog-forming pollutants per mile."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-31-2010, 06:40 PM
 
Location: West LA
2,318 posts, read 7,819,271 times
Reputation: 1125
Call me a nanny-stater if you must, but I am in favor of this regulation. Motorcycle tailpipe volume, IMHO, has gotten to the point where it disturbs the public peace. I've heard motorcycles that have physically hurt my ear drums they are so loud. Not to mention the disturbance they cause at night when people are asleep. I'm not against all aftermarket exhausts... but there has to be a limit!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2010, 06:45 PM
 
9,523 posts, read 30,373,968 times
Reputation: 6434
Would prefer boom car legislation first.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2010, 06:49 PM
 
Location: 38°14′45″N 122°37′53″W
4,156 posts, read 10,983,682 times
Reputation: 3438
Quote:
Originally Posted by LASam View Post
Call me a nanny-stater if you must, but I am in favor of this regulation. Motorcycle tailpipe volume, IMHO, has gotten to the point where it disturbs the public peace. I've heard motorcycles that have physically hurt my ear drums they are so loud. Not to mention the disturbance they cause at night when people are asleep. I'm not against all aftermarket exhausts... but there has to be a limit!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sassberto View Post
Would prefer boom car legislation first.
Why can't they just get it all rolled into one bill? That'd be great.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2010, 06:49 PM
 
Location: West LA
2,318 posts, read 7,819,271 times
Reputation: 1125
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sassberto View Post
Would prefer boom car legislation first.
I agree that it should apply to cars and motorcycles, though from my experience there are far more obnoxiously loud motorcycles out there than cars.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2010, 06:58 PM
 
Location: South Bay
7,226 posts, read 22,116,059 times
Reputation: 3626
i understand that motorcycles being noisier than cars adds is added safety for those choosing to roll on 2 wheels rather than four, but i've heard some bikes that are so over the top loud that the owner should be cited. i'm anti big brother as well, but when my hearing is at stake, something needs to be done.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2010, 07:27 PM
 
Location: California
11,466 posts, read 19,299,424 times
Reputation: 12712
LOL there are already laws agians't modified exhaust for all vehicles, why put another law in the books when they can enforce the ones that are already in place. the way I read it is it will only affect bikes being sold in and after 2013, that makes no sense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2010, 07:54 PM
 
4,803 posts, read 10,139,094 times
Reputation: 2785
who cares?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-31-2010, 10:38 PM
 
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
1,482 posts, read 5,162,709 times
Reputation: 798
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoCalBrad View Post
who cares?
I do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2010, 12:46 AM
 
Location: Coachella Valley, California
15,639 posts, read 40,935,261 times
Reputation: 13467
I don't know about new legislation, whether this is the way to go or not, but I do hate it when I'm staying at a hotel and have finally fallen asleep (hard to sleep someplace other than my own bed) and a super loud motorcycle drives by and wakes me up. Not only that, but I can hear it for like a mile down the road!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top