U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 400,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 13,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads. Within the last few months our forum was cited in an article in 15 newspaper and in a story on AOL's homepage.

Get a detailed profile of any city, county, or zip code:
      Search our forums (advanced):

Reply

 
Old 08-30-2007, 07:28 AM
El Vampiro
Status: "Those who have abandoned their dreams will discourage yours" (set 3 days ago)
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Los Feliz
1,745 posts, read 929,457 times
Reputation: 403
Sorcerer68 is just really niceSorcerer68 is just really niceSorcerer68 is just really niceSorcerer68 is just really niceSorcerer68 is just really niceSorcerer68 is just really niceSorcerer68 is just really niceSorcerer68 is just really niceSorcerer68 is just really nice
Send a message via AIM to Sorcerer68 Send a message via Yahoo to Sorcerer68
Quote:
Originally Posted by Humanoid View Post
Most of the efforts in old industrial cities have failed, for example Pittsburgh, Cleveland, Detroit etc. Yet all of these areas have "hot" areas outside of the city that are doing well (ahem suburbs).
All? Are you sure? Regarding the rust belt...most of it is shrinking. Regarding suburbs..young people from the city for the most part aren't the buyers. And you're getting your first trickle of immigrants who have made a little dough. There will be more of this. Remember, they got displaced when we gentrified their neighborhoods. The poor ones went East, South or to Lancaster. Pittsburgh is coming along nicely. It's established suburbs are doing what much of the rest of the country is doing in this market. I worry about the job market supporting growth. I've been watching it closely. It's gentrification is just getting underway. Cleveland is a dying city. Period. It's still nicer than Detroit. The mass exodus will show up on the next census. Detroit is a disaster. I don't see people flocking to live in the Detroit suburbs. I'm not sure why you think this. It seems I meet someone else every other day who's left. More data that's readily available. Detroit's vacancies are out of this world right now and prices are plummeting. Another shrinking city. Next census will reflect this.

Quote:
...Also, it should be noted that that many suburban areas have gone up in value more than LA, for example Orange County....
In case you didn't get the memo, the whole state has had price increases through the roof. Also, OC is NOT Los Angeles although technically part of the metro area. I was discussing recently gentrified neighborhoods which have outpaced even the OC in price increases. Mt Washington and Echo Park are the current crown holders in that department. I listed the numbers in a previous post. You're stretching this thin, what you started griping at me about was my claim that the younger generation of city dwellers wants to live in the city, not vanilla car based suburbs their parents fled to. The real estate price increases and still decent sales in close in, recently gentrified neighborhoods proves this. The younger generation includes me, I'm thirtysomething. I have plenty of money and there are scores of others like me. Most of the ones of my generation who want to live in suburbs were poor kids that have made a little money. They live in gated communities too. They don't shop at thrift stores nor do they go to flea markets or antique stores. They want a life opposite of their childhood. I do my homework.

Quote:
Of course demand is related to housing prices, but the younger generation doesn't have a lot of money.
Well, some do and some don't. For those seeking lower prices in L.A., why would you pay twice as much for a house in Agoura Hills which will sentence you to half your life in your car and absolutely nothing to do when you can buy something in a newly gentrifying, thriving neighgborhood in the city? Walkable urban villages have been carved out all over the place. New suburbs aren't. Like I said, the data is all there, I already told you where to find it.

Quote:
Its common for people 35 and younger to have tons of student debt etc. They simply can't afford the current home prices
Some can, some can't. Being in the business allowed me to meet them face to face. I love helping the ones of limited means take advantage of government programs to help with down payments, low interest loans and free money to renovate...get them started investing by buying something with more than one unit which in some cases the rental income will pay their whole mortgage...and tax incentives to boot. Rich or poor, I love 'em all.

Quote:
If you want to talk about supply/demand you need to also consider the fact that as prices go up demand will dramatically drop.
I'm afraid you've put the cart before the horse. First the demand drops, THEN the prices drop. There are plenty of cheap houses in our country because nobody wants them or far less people want them.

Quote:
Therefore, at the current prices the supply is far greater than the demand.
Demand sets prices. Period. Interesting concept you have of free-floating real estate prices...in some areas...like suburbs...inventory has piled up as they have in many areas. Prices will drop there. The unilateral drop will be in condos, very few will completely hold their value no matter where they are. I explained why in a previous post.

Quote:
Take a look at Axiom's post above, to even afford a basic condo/home you need to make 100k+ a year! Even with an advanced degree your typical starting pay is not 100k+ a year.
I quit school in the 11th grade and my household income is...well, much, much more than the figure you just listed. I got some college later and the job I got as a result made 23k a year. I became an entrepreneur/wheeler dealer after that. Most people don't buy houses and live in them alone. Combined household income is either enough or it's not. Getting 2 people to make 100k in Southern California isn't terribly difficult. My partner alone makes more than that working part time. If it is, people rent. Home ownership isn't a given. 87% of Manhattan residents rent and most of them wouldn't live anywhere else. We aren't anywhere near those numbers. Our housing market is making more renters, sad to say. People like me own the properties they live in. The neighborhood I grew up in started requiring 100k a year about 1980 to buy a house on my street.


Quote:
Prices always move first with the low-end homes and the less desirable areas. The fact that prices on higher-end homes aren't moving much is typical of a housing crush. You won't see big movements on the high-end until next selling seasons.
I knew the housing crunch was coming in early 2005 when I recieved a panic call from an agent friend who worked in...the high-end market. That's always the first to cool. It's actually both the top and the bottom. The middle holds for the longest because it has the most demand. The prices high-end haven't moved so much as the sales. Hollywood Hills homes are worth more than ever but it seems every other home is for sale. They aren't moving. LB has dropped like a rock, some areas 20%. I followed this closely and still am. I almost bought something there but had the feeling...This time next year I'm buying a bunch of multi unit properties there. I said all this before. If an area is lower priced but undergoing gentrification, the prices will continue to rise. If it's not seen as a desirable area, they won't. This is part of the concept of supply and demand. Echo Park is still selling as we speak and the prices are still going up. Every weekend I see pretty young couples unloading their moving vans.

Like I said before, you must take this neighborhood by neighborhood. It's not simply "this or that". I've done hundreds of hours of research because my livelihood depends upon it. Nuff said.

Some images of hot selling areas:







[+] Rate this post positively

Last edited by Sorcerer68; 08-30-2007 at 07:45 AM.
Reply With Quote
 
Old 08-30-2007, 09:04 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
5 posts, read 2,030 times
Reputation: 10
MOONGOLD is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by PureHapa View Post
California is the world's 5th largest economy - leading France, Italy and China. Chew on that for a minute.

Okay, so loads of people live here, loads of those people have money, California has always attracted the Gold Rush mentality, for good or for bad.

Why are some areas not going to go down, or at least not as much as other areas? Location and demand. Close to the ocean is where most folks want to live. It's picturesque. It's nicer weather, etc. Prices are "run up" here like everywhere else, but people have the money to snatch up these million-plus homes.

And? I'm not rich, per se. But I own properties, I live at the beach, and I've got equity to burn. I also have the best credit. I am looking to buy 2-4 more commercial and residential properties in the coming year. I have cash available to put large downs. I don't believe, for myself personally, in leveraging with no money down. My money makes me money. And there are lots of Californians like me.

And another point - INVENTORY. there is no more land to develop on in most of Los Angeles County. L.A. County is not where KB Homes, Toll Brothers, Lennar, etc. built out thousands of tract homes in the last 5 years.

That was in the areas I mentioned earlier. They are not the desirable areas. They are over-built and have a glut of inventory at the moment.

Here's some numbers to illustrate for you:

Population of Temecula: 57,716. Homes for sale: 2522. Room to build? Yes.
Prices dropping? Yes.

Population of Corona: 124,966. Homes for sale: 3924. Room to build? Yes.
Prices dropping? Yes.

Population of Torrance: 142,384. Homes for sale: 725. Room to build? No.
Prices dropping? No or not much.

Mortgage default notices in the Inland region have almost tripled since last year. Home foreclosures have increased almost eightfold. And home sales last month were the worst in a decade.

Real-estate experts and economists say today's housing woes might be just the beginning of trouble.

In the past six months, almost 22,000 Inland homeowners received notices of default, and 6,367 homes were taken through foreclosure. This bloodbath is not happening in desirable areas.
WHAT ABOUT PALM SPRINGS-PALM DESERT AREA? WHAT ARE THE PERDICTIONS FOR RESALE IN A GATED COMMUNITY?

[+] Rate this post positively
Reply With Quote
 
Old 08-31-2007, 12:43 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
946 posts, read 337,978 times
Reputation: 289
davidt1 is a jewel in the roughdavidt1 is a jewel in the roughdavidt1 is a jewel in the roughdavidt1 is a jewel in the roughdavidt1 is a jewel in the roughdavidt1 is a jewel in the rough
There is gonna be a bailout. This will mean less foreclosures. Prices will remain high and out of reach for many people. Folks who couldn't afford to buy before still won't be able to buy anytime soon as long as the government takes care of greedy lenders and irresponsible people.

Bloomberg.com: Worldwide

[+] Rate this post positively
Reply With Quote
 
Old 08-31-2007, 04:06 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
644 posts, read 264,130 times
Reputation: 233
katie45 has a spectacular aura aboutkatie45 has a spectacular aura aboutkatie45 has a spectacular aura aboutkatie45 has a spectacular aura aboutkatie45 has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidt1 View Post
There is gonna be a bailout. This will mean less foreclosures. Prices will remain high and out of reach for many people. Folks who couldn't afford to buy before still won't be able to buy anytime soon as long as the government takes care of greedy lenders and irresponsible people.

Bloomberg.com: Worldwide
Amazing isn't it? Our tax dollars will allow irresponsible people to keep their homes! I wonder if they could do that for car sales as well? I could go out and get a loan for a 2008 Vette and not have to worry about making the payments....as soon as I was three months behind, the govt would bail me out! What next?

[+] Rate this post positively
Reply With Quote
 
Old 08-31-2007, 01:44 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Diego
232 posts, read 162,655 times
Reputation: 32
justsomeguy is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by katie45 View Post
Amazing isn't it? Our tax dollars will allow irresponsible people to keep their homes! I wonder if they could do that for car sales as well? I could go out and get a loan for a 2008 Vette and not have to worry about making the payments....as soon as I was three months behind, the govt would bail me out! What next?

There won't be a bailout, they are just going to let some homeowners refinance their homes at a reasonable fixed rate. I think this is a fair proposal. It also makes sense because if you let things get too out of hand it is going to bring down everyone else and the economy with it.

Bush outlines plans to help homeowners - Mortgage Mess - MSNBC.com

[+] Rate this post positively
Reply With Quote
 
Old 08-31-2007, 05:27 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
946 posts, read 337,978 times
Reputation: 289
davidt1 is a jewel in the roughdavidt1 is a jewel in the roughdavidt1 is a jewel in the roughdavidt1 is a jewel in the roughdavidt1 is a jewel in the roughdavidt1 is a jewel in the rough
It is a bailout. Many of these "innocent" home owners used their home equity to purchase luxury vehicles. If it wasn't, the goverment would not have gotten involved. The same man who told the American people his immigration reform bill was not amnesty now tells the country that "helping" greedy lenders and irresponsible people is not a bailout. As others have mentioned on the other forums, Bush could care less about home owners. The man is simply trying to avoid adding this fiasco to his long list of failures as President.

[+] Rate this post positively

Last edited by davidt1; 08-31-2007 at 05:36 PM.
Reply With Quote
 
Old 08-31-2007, 05:34 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Diego
232 posts, read 162,655 times
Reputation: 32
justsomeguy is on a distinguished road
Get off the anti-Bush kick and use some reason. President Bush is not responsible for this "fiasco". Why do Bush haters blame Bush for everything that happens in America. The Padres lost last night, it must have been George Bush's fault. I'm not a Bush fan, but c'mon, get off the guys nutz. He is not responsible for the housing market debacle.

Secondly how is allowing people with good credit to re-finance their homes at a better fixed interest rate a bailout. To me a bailout is using government tax dollars to subsidize people's payments so they can keep their homes. Which, coincidentally, is what the Democrats want to do, most noticably Hillary Clinton. This just shows how partisan some people are. The Democrats want to do a true bailout and go further way than what George Bush has mentioned but still it is George Bush that you attack.

[+] Rate this post positively
Reply With Quote
 
Old 08-31-2007, 06:07 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
946 posts, read 337,978 times
Reputation: 289
davidt1 is a jewel in the roughdavidt1 is a jewel in the roughdavidt1 is a jewel in the roughdavidt1 is a jewel in the roughdavidt1 is a jewel in the roughdavidt1 is a jewel in the rough
Partisan? Who is being partisan? I did not mention any body by political affiliation. You did. I critized Bush because he is the one making the decision. If it was a democrat making the same decision, I would say what the same thing. Let me clarify something here, at best he is trying to prevent future damage to the economy, which would only add to his tarnished image as President.

[+] Rate this post positively
Reply With Quote
 
Old 08-31-2007, 06:23 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
331 posts, read 165,061 times
Reputation: 94
Axiom will become famous soon enoughAxiom will become famous soon enough
It will be interesting to see how it all unfolds.

Bush is still saying that while he plans to help homeowners, it's not the government's job to bail out speculators, or those who made the decision to buy a home they knew they could never afford.


I guess by excluding non-owner occupied homes (which account for a much larger share of defaults in CA than nationally BTW) he could attempt to weed out some of the speculators; but drawing that line to determine who are poor struggling homeowners worthy of federal intervention and who made the decision to buy something they could never afford and as such are not deserving of help gets trickier IMO

Base it on any kind of traditional affordability scale and I bet most CA homeowners would fall into the latter catagory.

[+] Rate this post positively
Reply With Quote
 
Old 08-31-2007, 06:35 PM
One Ostrich at a time....
Status: "tired of hearing the spoonfed crap!!" (set 10 days ago)
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
1,470 posts, read 649,638 times
Reputation: 257
shannon94 is a jewel in the roughshannon94 is a jewel in the roughshannon94 is a jewel in the roughshannon94 is a jewel in the roughshannon94 is a jewel in the roughshannon94 is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by justsomeguy View Post
Secondly how is allowing people with good credit to re-finance their homes at a better fixed interest rate a bailout. To me a bailout is using government tax dollars to subsidize people's payments so they can keep their homes. Which, coincidentally, is what the Democrats want to do, most noticably Hillary Clinton. This just shows how partisan some people are. The Democrats want to do a true bailout and go further way than what George Bush has mentioned but still it is George Bush that you attack.


I'm guessing most of these people can't afford the new fixed rate (Even with good credit)or they wouldn't have purchased with an ARM or IO loan. And alot of these people don't have "good" credit...that's why there's so much talk about the subprime market. This will only help a very small percentage out there. This whole thing is a friggin joke. Neither Bush or Bernanke said anything today.

[+] Rate this post positively
Reply With Quote
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It's free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads

Forum Jump

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:30 PM.

Copyright © 2005-2008, Advameg, Inc.