U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply
 
Unread 11-01-2011, 12:06 AM
 
Location: Sacramento
13,132 posts, read 12,843,061 times
Reputation: 4564
Default More High Speed Rail Cost Problems

In my opinion it is a shame they just don't pull the plug on this project:

California's high speed rail project, if built, will cost $98 billion, more than twice as much as previously thought, according to a report obtained by The Bee.


Capitol Alert: High-speed rail costs expected to more than double
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Unread 11-01-2011, 02:25 AM
 
2,313 posts, read 1,001,225 times
Reputation: 1179
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewToCA View Post
In my opinion it is a shame they just don't pull the plug on this project:

California's high speed rail project, if built, will cost $98 billion, more than twice as much as previously thought, according to a report obtained by The Bee.


Capitol Alert: High-speed rail costs expected to more than double
Wont be satisfied until they burn a hole straight through tax payer's pants
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 11-01-2011, 06:35 AM
Status: "Where have all the liberals gone, long time passing" (set 18 hours ago)
 
15,030 posts, read 6,071,857 times
Reputation: 12378
"For ye suffer fools gladly, seeing ye yourselves are wise" -Paul
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 11-01-2011, 09:44 AM
 
Location: On the Rails in Northern NJ
11,598 posts, read 8,283,729 times
Reputation: 3614
If you pull the plug on this then the Northeastern states would get all your $$$....we deserve it more then you do at this point....this will also make your state look bad if you pulled the project....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 11-01-2011, 09:53 AM
 
1,907 posts, read 1,353,454 times
Reputation: 725
I think high speed rail is a great idea for California, but I don't trust the California High Speed Rail Authority. We need to replace them. Their plan does too little for too much money. We need mag lev.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 11-01-2011, 10:04 AM
 
Location: In them thar hills
6,548 posts, read 6,262,113 times
Reputation: 2811
Even being generous, it will never be 1/5th of the Keystone in terms of volume. Kill it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 11-01-2011, 10:06 AM
 
Location: In them thar hills
6,548 posts, read 6,262,113 times
Reputation: 2811
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nexis4Jersey View Post
If you pull the plug on this then the Northeastern states would get all your $$$....we deserve it more then you do at this point....this will also make your state look bad if you pulled the project....
The NE would actually make good use of the $$ instead of trying to pretend CA has the general widespread density to warrant HSR. Here, density is in widely separated enclaves. WITHIN such enclaves mass transit works, between them it does not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 11-01-2011, 10:09 AM
 
2,288 posts, read 1,976,849 times
Reputation: 1022
Built it all at once or don't build it at all. The SF-LA portion will end up costing $200 billion and the Sac-SD portion will never get built.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 11-01-2011, 10:11 AM
 
171 posts, read 105,542 times
Reputation: 91
Such a bummer this project is so expensive. After traveling through Europe and Asia on trains, I believe it would be a great asset to California.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 11-01-2011, 10:20 AM
 
Location: On the Rails in Northern NJ
11,598 posts, read 8,283,729 times
Reputation: 3614
Quote:
Originally Posted by BayAreaHillbilly View Post
The NE would actually make good use of the $$ instead of trying to pretend CA has the general widespread density to warrant HSR. Here, density is in widely separated enclaves. WITHIN such enclaves mass transit works, between them it does not.
You have large cities and small cities in between....the density is less then the NE , but theres enough there. The Northeastern HSR is expected to cost 110 Billion , but will mostly go through rural areas aside from the large cities. We also have 30 Billion $$ of Intercity routes planned and 310 Billion $$ worth of commuter rail , Light Rail and subway projects....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $53,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Options
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2005-2010 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $47,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:21 AM.

© 2005-2013, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 - Top