Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-22-2012, 07:19 PM
 
11 posts, read 27,466 times
Reputation: 21

Advertisements

I'd be interested to see what you all think about partitioning California into 5 states, something like this:


[url=facebook.com/equalrepresentation/]

Lines drawn when California's population was less than 100,000 no longer reflect our social, economic, and cultural differences. California is the largest state in the union by population, and as such, nearly one in six Americans is a Californian. Only one in 50 senators is a Californian, however. The east coast of the United States has 32 senators representing its interests, while the west coast only has 6. If California were a country, it would be the world's 8th largest economy. 40 million people deserve to have their voices heard in the senate. Partitioning the state isn't about division, it's about REvision. The golden state is simply too large to manage as one entity.

Politically, a 5 state solution is a far superior to the two state solution proposed in 2011 by Riverside county supervisor Jeff Stone. The map 5 Californias uses would create two blue states, two red states, and a swing state (the San Joaquin Valley). These lines are of course not inflexible, and the number of states is certainly up for debase at well, the purpose of the map is simply to provide a visual reference and get people talking.

We need to talk about this, not just Californians, but as a nation. I have to stress, the creation of this map is not about separating people politically, it's about bringing the capital closer to home, having people participate in policy-making because they believe they can make a difference, and giving oft-marginalized regions a voice at the national level.

Let the comments begin.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-22-2012, 07:26 PM
 
Location: anywhere but Seattle
1,082 posts, read 2,542,909 times
Reputation: 999
Quote:
Originally Posted by Equal Representation View Post
Partition California into 5 states
Divide and conquer. Another right wing nut job idea.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2012, 07:52 PM
 
Location: The High Seas
7,373 posts, read 15,936,016 times
Reputation: 11865
Poor San Joaquin gets left out on coastal access.
This leads to an all-out war with a two-pronged approach, as SJ divides its army to head northwest into Reyes while sending another division southwest into San Gabriel. San Joaquin elicits help from the Cabrillo armed forces to go against San Gabriel, promising them an unending supply of first-rate carrots and potatoes from the fertile Arvin farmlands. After months of coastal bombardment of the San Gabriel territory by the Cabrillian Armada, the former surrenders and cedes political rights to SJ and Cabrillo. Naturally, this develops into its own situation and Cabrillo and San Joaquin are now at war, with Cabrillo developing an appetite for unhindered access to Arvin and its carrots and potatoes.
In short, this will never work. Many lives would be lost.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2012, 08:06 PM
 
Location: Declezville, CA
16,806 posts, read 39,757,112 times
Reputation: 17678
Oooooh girl, OC's gonna hate being lumped in with the IE.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2012, 08:08 PM
 
11,715 posts, read 40,312,625 times
Reputation: 7585
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fontucky View Post
Oooooh girl, OC's gonna hate being lumped in with the IE.
Better than with LA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2012, 08:09 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,095 posts, read 25,885,231 times
Reputation: 6128
Quote:
Originally Posted by evergraystate View Post
Divide and conquer. Another right wing nut job idea.
The above is why California is messed up. No where in Equal Representation's post was any political affiliation of the OP mentioned. Politics was only mentioned by the statement about two blue states, 2 red states, and a swing state. Evergraystate jumps all over this very reasonable suggestion by proclaiming it a "right wing nut job idea". Until our state can come together instead of being divided politically - there is no hope. We are deeply in debt, our school system ranks near the bottom nationally, businesses are fleeing in droves due to excessive taxation and regulation and taking much needed jobs with them, and our infrastructure is aging and deteriating. Instead of adding to a constructive discussion to solve these issues - evergreenstate goes on a politically biased rant - and does not even live in this state!

Now let's try to have a reasonable discussion on this without the political slam attacks.

I like the idea - I do not think it will happen - because the Constitution makes this very difficult. Article IV Section 3 of the United States Constitution states "New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or parts of States, without the Consent of the Leglislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress".

The 5 state proposal makes sense geographically, culturally, and politically - however it would never pass the vote of our Leglislature - let alone Congress. The two state solution is more workable - and even it would be a longshot to pass the Constitutional requirements.

But I like the hyothetical idea. Let's kick it around some - without the petty sniping by the likes of evergraystate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2012, 08:09 PM
 
Location: Metro Phoenix
11,054 posts, read 16,750,121 times
Reputation: 12942
Quote:
Originally Posted by EscapeCalifornia View Post
Better than with LA.
Seems as though it's worked well for it up till now...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2012, 08:18 PM
 
Location: Escondido, CA
1,504 posts, read 6,128,586 times
Reputation: 886
Quote:
The map 5 Californias uses would create two blue states, two red states, and a swing state (the San Joaquin Valley).
Actually no, it would create two solid-blue states, two blue-leaning swing states, and one red state. "Reyes" and "San Gabriel" are obviously blue, and, If I got my numbers right, in 2008, counties comprising "Cabrillo" and "San Joaquin", voted for Obama 52%/48% and 52%/48%. And the biggest thing that keeps San Joaquin Valley from going solid-blue is Bakersfield, which is (for now) leaning red, but its Latino population share grew from 32% to 45% in the last ten years and soon it will be blue as well. Obama took all other SJV population centers in 2008, sometimes by sizable margins (San Joaquin County - 54%/44%, Sacramento County - 58%/39%).

It's quite hard to make even one, let alone two functional red states out of CA, most red counties are thinly populated and lack any kind of economy. In the partition above, the largest city in "Jefferson" would be Redding (population: 90,000), and the whole construct looks as sustainable economically as Nevada would be without Las Vegas.

Last edited by esmith143; 01-22-2012 at 08:31 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2012, 08:28 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,095 posts, read 25,885,231 times
Reputation: 6128
Latinos are not entirely a blue voting bloc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2012, 08:42 PM
 
Location: Southern California
15,083 posts, read 20,392,732 times
Reputation: 10343
Quote:
Originally Posted by Equal Representation View Post
I'd be interested to see what you all think about partitioning California into 5 states, something like this:


[url=facebook.com/equalrepresentation/]

Lines drawn when California's population was less than 100,000 no longer reflect our social, economic, and cultural differences. California is the largest state in the union by population, and as such, nearly one in six Americans is a Californian. Only one in 50 senators is a Californian, however. The east coast of the United States has 32 senators representing its interests, while the west coast only has 6. If California were a country, it would be the world's 8th largest economy. 40 million people deserve to have their voices heard in the senate. Partitioning the state isn't about division, it's about REvision. The golden state is simply too large to manage as one entity.

Politically, a 5 state solution is a far superior to the two state solution proposed in 2011 by Riverside county supervisor Jeff Stone. The map 5 Californias uses would create two blue states, two red states, and a swing state (the San Joaquin Valley). These lines are of course not inflexible, and the number of states is certainly up for debase at well, the purpose of the map is simply to provide a visual reference and get people talking.

We need to talk about this, not just Californians, but as a nation. I have to stress, the creation of this map is not about separating people politically, it's about bringing the capital closer to home, having people participate in policy-making because they believe they can make a difference, and giving oft-marginalized regions a voice at the national level.

Let the comments begin.

The green bolded text contradicts the red bolded text. It appears to me that it is about separating people politically. Also, what are the proposed capitals for each state? If the goal is to bring the capital closer to home, should not the red and green colored areas of the map be more compact?

[this is similar to the discussion about some states seceding from the US]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top