U.S. Cities  

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
Register Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Get a detailed profile
Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
Reply


 
Old 11-08-2007, 08:23 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
358 posts, read 496,623 times
Reputation: 90
Milliano will become famous soon enoughMilliano will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
My primary issue is that the greatest catalyst for inland development in Northern California is the refusal of Bay Area cities and towns to allow the development of the millions of housing units that will be needed to accomodate this flood of new people.

Our super strict zoning laws in The Bay Area are really self defeating.

Currently,
The Bay Area has only developed 16% of its total land area...84% remains totally undeveloped which comes out to about 4 Million prime acres sitting there unused-all due to NIMBYS who want to have it all by having their piece of paradise without thinking about the people who'll be moving there in the future. Meanwhile, all the developers are plowing away at the Delta(of all places) and fertile farmlands in the Central Valley which creates horrible traffic and pollution in the valleys-not to mention a huge housing shortage here that has pushed our median home price to within striking distance of a million dollars(for heavenssake)
All those 'prime acres' in marshland, mountains, parks, and earthquake-risk land? The ones who started spilling out that garbage about the lack of developed land in the Bay Area are groups that have hidden (and not so hidden) agendas. Their motives are obviously insincere and their "facts" and extremely misleading.

The #1 problem is an American problem, and that is their irrational "need" for a huge single family house with a big garage and big yard in the 'suburbs'. People don't want to live in condos and apartments. Let them have their houses in the valley. There are plenty of areas near downtowns in the Bay Area that could have low density housing replaced with mixed/medium density, if people wanted to live in such conditions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-08-2007, 11:29 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: São Paulo, Brazil
9,050 posts, read 5,588,981 times
Reputation: 1939
18Montclair has a brilliant future
18Montclair has a brilliant future18Montclair has a brilliant future18Montclair has a brilliant future
^Im all for urban infill. As far as Im concerned, we could squeeze another 2 Million people along the 80/880 corridor from Vallejo to San Jose.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-08-2007, 11:51 PM
life...its the most unfair event that will ever ha
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: West LA
3,058 posts, read 3,449,016 times
Reputation: 587
jessemh431 is a name known to alljessemh431 is a name known to alljessemh431 is a name known to alljessemh431 is a name known to alljessemh431 is a name known to alljessemh431 is a name known to alljessemh431 is a name known to alljessemh431 is a name known to alljessemh431 is a name known to alljessemh431 is a name known to alljessemh431 is a name known to all
Send a message via AIM to jessemh431
I wouldn't be suprised if that population becomes even higher. Unless more white people start moving to LA, it will just be one large ghetto. Then, the Hispanics will start moving to San Diego more than they do now. Most white people from SoCal will probably move into places in the Bay Area, most likely San Jose since it's most similar to SoCal.

I think the I.E. will grow a lot. It has to take the majority of families moving to the LA area because most can't afford LA county and we are starting to build a lot of condominiums in place of homes.

Ventura, Oxnard, Camarillo, and Santa Paula will form one large metro area. Thousand Oaks and Simi Valley will be forced to build into the mountains. Those two areas may combine to form a megalopolis.

Sacramento will have to take in a lot of growth since it has quite a bit of room to grow. There will be no breaks in cities along the freeway starting in Vallejo and continuing into Sacramento which will become another metro/megalopolis.

Stockton, Turlock, Modesto, and Merced will be connected.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Reply


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:54 PM.

Copyright © 2005-2009, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 - Top