Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-27-2008, 12:40 PM
 
Location: MSP
559 posts, read 1,323,672 times
Reputation: 479

Advertisements

So, I was bored the other day and was reading some from my old collection of encyclopedias (1936 to be exact) and it described southern California as "an earthly paradise". Back then the population of the whole state was 6.7 million (close to 40 million today).
Now, I have been to SoCal on many occasions, and would personally not label it as "an earthly paradise", although it is a nice area.
I was just wondering, would any one still label SoCal that way? Why or why not? It seems to me that the area probably was very paradise like when it had a fraction of the people and CARS!
Has the influx of people over the last century ruined paradise forever?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-27-2008, 01:50 PM
 
566 posts, read 1,939,443 times
Reputation: 335
It was a paradise in the 1960's. Plenty of room to move around. New freeways being built everywhere (by a Democrat governor no less). The SFV was clean and fun. Hollywood and the beaches were a short drive away and were all safe and exciting. The attitude was upbeat. The future was bright.

Now I see an overcrowded, deteriorating place. Freeways are a mess as construcution has been stopped by the now Democrat majority in Sacramento. And of course the major difference is the effect that millions upon millions of immigrants, mostly from Mexico, have had on the state. Paradise lost is a more appropriate description of the place now. Quite sad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2008, 01:57 PM
 
11,715 posts, read 40,446,365 times
Reputation: 7586
Quote:
Originally Posted by cobmw View Post
It was a paradise in the 1960's. Plenty of room to move around. New freeways being built everywhere (by a Democrat governor no less). The SFV was clean and fun. Hollywood and the beaches were a short drive away and were all safe and exciting. The attitude was upbeat. The future was bright.

Now I see an overcrowded, deteriorating place. Freeways are a mess as construcution has been stopped by the now Democrat majority in Sacramento. And of course the major difference is the effect that millions upon millions of immigrants, mostly from Mexico, have had on the state. Paradise lost is a more appropriate description of the place now. Quite sad.
That's pretty much how I feel. What's frustrating to me is how the older generation doesn't seem to understand that the California I want to leave today with isn't the one they moved to 40 years ago. I guess its easier when your house is paid for and you don't have to commute 10 times a week in horrible traffic to still see the positive aspects of the area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2008, 03:30 PM
 
Location: Las Flores, Orange County, CA
26,329 posts, read 93,748,294 times
Reputation: 17831
Quote:
Originally Posted by EscapeCalifornia View Post
....the older generation doesn't seem to understand that the California I want to leave today with isn't the one they moved to 40 years ago. I guess its easier when your house is paid for and you don't have to commute 10 times a week in horrible traffic to still see the positive aspects of the area.
That is exactly my parents and me.

I still remember my mom's expression when we told her we're moving to Colorado, "Charles, you're making a mistake." She's from Buffalo and if it isn't SoCal, everything is just like Buffalo - snow, grey, depressing, etc.. Looking forward to telling her it was about 70 in Denver today, shorts and t-shirts, we took the kids horseback riding, Harley's everywhere, sunny, ...

Right mom.

But back to the original post, yes, California is an earthly paradise if you don't have to negotiate the traffic or work in a high density region and you already own a home or you have tons of money.

Not long ago in 1997 gorgeous homes in Thousand Oaks were $150/sqft. We bought one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2008, 05:58 PM
 
580 posts, read 1,680,903 times
Reputation: 108
Not by a long shot... I wouldnt even give California that name in the 1900's
I suppose that name was given to California from those wealthy by the gold rush ( or ancestors )... It was simply yellow journalism thats all
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2008, 06:06 PM
 
Location: San Antonio Texas
11,431 posts, read 18,997,649 times
Reputation: 5224
Quote:
Originally Posted by Isaysos View Post
So, I was bored the other day and was reading some from my old collection of encyclopedias (1936 to be exact) and it described southern California as "an earthly paradise". Back then the population of the whole state was 6.7 million (close to 40 million today).
Now, I have been to SoCal on many occasions, and would personally not label it as "an earthly paradise", although it is a nice area.
I was just wondering, would any one still label SoCal that way? Why or why not? It seems to me that the area probably was very paradise like when it had a fraction of the people and CARS!
Has the influx of people over the last century ruined paradise forever?
the answer is unfortunately yes. when i lived in socal, i used to look for traces of what socal must have looked like even 30-40 years ago (the 1950s-1960s). in the early 90s, there were still large strawberry fields in so orange cty and orange groves in oxnard- sta paula area. now those large strawberry fields are the irvine promenade and the other irvine shopping center (forgot the name) that was much more widespread in the old days. old timers would tell me about the scent of the orange blossoms, etc. many of the original rivers were still flowing also. so cal really exploded population wise in the 1950s. when i would ask older people where they were from, a lot of them were from the midwestern states and came over in the 50s. nowadays, many suburbs look very generic like you would find in any other major city. some suburbs resemble more tijuana than so calif.
"earthly paradise" is not a phrase that comes to mind when i think of so cal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2008, 06:11 PM
 
1,969 posts, read 6,390,841 times
Reputation: 1309
Depends on your commute, housing costs, salary, job, and where you live. For me it is as close to paradise as anyplace I've lived. But I can see how Colorado, Washington, Oregon, etc. could be another persons' paradise depending upon their interests (skiing), etc. I don't understand why anyone without ties to the Midwest or South would view it as anything other than just OK.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2008, 08:49 PM
 
1,999 posts, read 4,874,151 times
Reputation: 2069
I went bike riding earlier today and had a great view of Agriculture Fields and Snow Capped Mountains in the Distance with a Cool Fresh Breeze Blowing,so yes California is Paradise for me
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2008, 09:36 PM
 
Location: San Antonio Texas
11,431 posts, read 18,997,649 times
Reputation: 5224
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caliguy2007 View Post
I went bike riding earlier today and had a great view of Agriculture Fields and Snow Capped Mountains in the Distance with a Cool Fresh Breeze Blowing,so yes California is Paradise for me

where was that, caliguy?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2008, 10:16 PM
 
58 posts, read 80,856 times
Reputation: 29
I live in Stockton. You have got to be kidding.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top