Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-05-2015, 04:05 PM
 
17,874 posts, read 15,921,623 times
Reputation: 11659

Advertisements

Why has the Inland Empire (San Bernadino, Riverside Counties) develop to such extent, and the Antelope Valley and Southern Kern like Mojave, and Rosamond?

I have only been to the Antelope Valley, and Kern County. Both nice places with nice scenery. Antelope Valley has Palmdale and Lancaster, but no smaller cities or towns around it seemingly. In Kern you have towns like Mojave, Ridgecrest, and Rosamond which sprung around the military installations but there is nothing between those two or to Palmdale and Lancaster. And then there is California City out there by itself.

I drove to California City once late at night. LOL, it is all out there by itself. No street lights or anything between it and Tehachapi.

In the Inland Empire, you have cities similar in size to Palmdale and Lancaster, but they are surrounded by smaller towns and smaller cities.

I guess the Antelope Valley has a geographical feature separating it from Los Angeles. Does the Inland Empire not have anything separating it from Los Angeles and Orange County?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-05-2015, 05:31 PM
 
Location: Seal Beach, California
600 posts, read 824,288 times
Reputation: 454
The inland empire is closer to LA and OC vs antelope Valley and those locations you mentioned like Palmdale and Lancaster. Plus antelope Valley only has the 14 coming in.


At least the inland empire has 91, 210, 10, 66, 60, etc
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2015, 05:47 PM
 
Location: So Ca
26,712 posts, read 26,770,596 times
Reputation: 24770
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxLMG View Post
antelope Valley only has the 14 coming in.
Interesting information on the Antelope Valley. I didn't realize that the 14 wasn't even built until the mid-1960s.
GAVAR - Greater Antelope Valley Association of Realtors
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2015, 05:56 PM
 
Location: Anaheim
1,962 posts, read 4,481,776 times
Reputation: 1363
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJ Brazen_3133 View Post
Why has the Inland Empire (San Bernadino, Riverside Counties) develop to such extent, and the Antelope Valley and Southern Kern like Mojave, and Rosamond?

I have only been to the Antelope Valley, and Kern County. Both nice places with nice scenery. Antelope Valley has Palmdale and Lancaster, but no smaller cities or towns around it seemingly. In Kern you have towns like Mojave, Ridgecrest, and Rosamond which sprung around the military installations but there is nothing between those two or to Palmdale and Lancaster. And then there is California City out there by itself.

I drove to California City once late at night. LOL, it is all out there by itself. No street lights or anything between it and Tehachapi.

In the Inland Empire, you have cities similar in size to Palmdale and Lancaster, but they are surrounded by smaller towns and smaller cities.

I guess the Antelope Valley has a geographical feature separating it from Los Angeles. Does the Inland Empire not have anything separating it from Los Angeles and Orange County?
Part of the answer to that lies in the fact that the Antelope Valley is desert, whereas Riverside/San Bernardino are not.

Riverside came into existence because of the orange-growing industry, whereas San Bernardino was started by the Mormons, abandoned and then built up again because of citrus and the railroad coming through.

Just a longer history.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2015, 08:14 PM
 
Location: where the good looking people are
3,814 posts, read 4,006,587 times
Reputation: 3284
Inland Empire was an entirely seperate metro area.

Overtime the LA metro sprawled into it.

Antelope valley is way out there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2015, 10:20 PM
 
Location: Illinois
962 posts, read 630,469 times
Reputation: 266
Because the Antelope Valley is separated from the LA metropolis and the Inland Empire, by a stretch of mountains.

Palmdale and Lancaster are about 70 miles away from the area, and are rather isolated.

The IE was once a separate area to itself, but was brought together by the LA metro area as it grew quickly. There are mountains separating the twin cities in the Antelope Valley from the LA metro, although I guess theoretically they *could* count as part of the area, since it's still in LA county (which has a rather large land area), and the Kern County portion, part of the Bakersfield area, albeit remote.

As a result, they tend to have hotter weather in the summer, and nights during the winter can be quite colder than the rest of the metropolis, and colder than one would normally expect for California standards. (they have actually recorded wind-chills below zero before, just saying).

Last edited by It is 57 below zero; 09-05-2015 at 10:38 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2015, 10:53 PM
 
17,874 posts, read 15,921,623 times
Reputation: 11659
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxLMG View Post
The inland empire is closer to LA and OC vs antelope Valley and those locations you mentioned like Palmdale and Lancaster. Plus antelope Valley only has the 14 coming in.


At least the inland empire has 91, 210, 10, 66, 60, etc
But in San Bernardino, you have Hesperia, and Victorville, and Adelanto which are north over the Angeles Mountains. And Riverside county has Indio, Palm Desert and Cathedral City which are also pretty far into the interior. And the 14, 58, and the 138 go through Antelope Valley.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2015, 10:55 PM
 
17,874 posts, read 15,921,623 times
Reputation: 11659
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrsltd View Post
Part of the answer to that lies in the fact that the Antelope Valley is desert, whereas Riverside/San Bernardino are not.

Riverside came into existence because of the orange-growing industry, whereas San Bernardino was started by the Mormons, abandoned and then built up again because of citrus and the railroad coming through.

Just a longer history.
Both have some communities over the mountains in the interior too though. Are those areas not desert?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2015, 11:58 PM
 
Location: Anaheim
1,962 posts, read 4,481,776 times
Reputation: 1363
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJ Brazen_3133 View Post
Both have some communities over the mountains in the interior too though. Are those areas not desert?
Yes, but at some point it stops being called the Inland Empire and is just simply known as "the desert" -- for San Bernardino County it's the high desert --Victorville, Apple Valley, Hesperia, Oro Grande, Helendale -- and points farther east -- Yucca Valley, Twentynine Palms, etc. Actually pretty much all of San Bernardino County north of the mountains IS high desert (part of the Mojave), and there are many mountain ranges within that area. High desert is where the elevation is high enough for below-freezing temps and snow to occur in the winter.

For Riverside County, by and large, it's the low desert -- Palm Springs, Indio, Cabazon, La Quinta, etc, etc, though perhaps parts of northern Riverside County toward the Arizona border and Beaumont/Banning MIGHT qualify for high desert status. Low desert is lower in elevation -- in Imperial County much of the area is below sea level--and the Riverside County portion outlined above is a northern outlier of the Sonora/Colorado desert which extends into Mexico (biome people, feel free to correct where I am wrong).

Climatologists looking at rainfall will award desert status to areas receiving less than 10 inches of rain per year on the annual average. I would say that just outside of Moreno Valley is where the desert starts in earnest, at least as you go down the 60. There is a natural pass there between Moreno Valley and Beaumont......very interesting but weird to cross, especially in the dark.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2015, 12:01 AM
 
Location: Anaheim
1,962 posts, read 4,481,776 times
Reputation: 1363
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJ Brazen_3133 View Post
Both have some communities over the mountains in the interior too though. Are those areas not desert?
And, to add, I was referring to the CITIES of San Bernardino and Riverside (with immediately adjoining towns).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:40 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top