Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-07-2016, 09:54 PM
 
Location: Sierra Nevada Land, CA
9,455 posts, read 12,538,654 times
Reputation: 16453

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by eureka1 View Post
All I know is that my sister lived in Sonora and the traffic was horrible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-08-2016, 09:38 AM
 
Location: Carpinteria
1,199 posts, read 1,647,718 times
Reputation: 1184
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr5150 View Post
The only part of the 49 corridor with these issues is found in the section between HWY 80 and 50. South of 50 and north of 80 things are rural, wild and the air is clean. I live south of 50. Check it out for yourself.
LOL , It doesn't work that way. Nevada City has bad air and it's north of Hwy80. Many towns south of HWY 50 on the 49 corridor fail with a F score. As said,"Check it out for yourself".
California - American Lung Association | State of the Air 2015
Yosemite Valley and Seqouia NP both have terrible air and they are south of Hwy 50.
These National Parks Got an "F" in Air Pollution | Mother Jones
Read this 1996 report to better understand Sierra Nevada air.
http://pubs.usgs.gov/dds/dds-43/VOL_II/VII_C48.PDF
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2016, 01:34 PM
 
Location: Mountains of Oregon
17,633 posts, read 22,626,536 times
Reputation: 14388
Quote:
Originally Posted by eureka1 View Post
All I know is that my sister lived in Sonora and the traffic was horrible.
It's quiet, peaceful, & much more beautiful up around Strawberry........We used to fish, camp around there along the Stanislaus, with our 1978 American Clipper C motorhome.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2016, 05:49 PM
 
Location: Sierra Nevada Land, CA
9,455 posts, read 12,538,654 times
Reputation: 16453
Quote:
Originally Posted by sourdough View Post
I knew the Hwy. 49 corridor 40 years ago and loved the Sierra foothills. Now it's over crowded, smoggy and has drought problems. You are jumping from the fire into the pan IMHO. Broaden you horizon.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sourdough View Post
LOL , It doesn't work that way. Nevada City has bad air and it's north of Hwy80. Many towns south of HWY 50 on the 49 corridor fail with a F score. As said,"Check it out for yourself".
California - American Lung Association | State of the Air 2015
Yosemite Valley and Seqouia NP both have terrible air and they are south of Hwy 50.
These National Parks Got an "F" in Air Pollution | Mother Jones
Read this 1996 report to better understand Sierra Nevada air.
http://pubs.usgs.gov/dds/dds-43/VOL_II/VII_C48.PDF
Having thought about things, I support your negative view of the Gold Country. I really don't want a ton of people moving to our area and destroying paradise.

Unlike Carpentaria, where I live is horrible (cough). Please don't move here. But at least I can see the air I breathe! And I don't mind the three hour, 10 mile, commute to work and I have learned how to get by with only bathing once a week.

So my county had five bad air days out of 365 and it got a C according to the Lung people

Last edited by Mr5150; 02-08-2016 at 06:18 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2016, 06:11 PM
 
Location: Carpinteria
1,199 posts, read 1,647,718 times
Reputation: 1184
Default https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5150_(involuntary_

Mr5150
I am glad to see you are happy where you are. Cheers
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2016, 06:19 PM
 
Location: Sierra Nevada Land, CA
9,455 posts, read 12,538,654 times
Reputation: 16453
Quote:
Originally Posted by sourdough View Post
Mr5150
I am glad to see you are happy where you are. Cheers
My job had to do with 5150 types. And where I live is a retirement destination.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2016, 08:54 PM
 
10 posts, read 17,381 times
Reputation: 14
Lol! Stoppit.

But seriously, you're all giving me a lot of good things to consider, which I greatly appreciate. We're not in a huge rush to move but we are starting the process of exploration, so thinking about air quality issues, how much acreage is reasonable, and traffic considerations is all important.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2016, 08:24 PM
 
Location: Oroville, California
3,477 posts, read 6,507,394 times
Reputation: 6796
Quote:
Originally Posted by sourdough View Post
LOL , It doesn't work that way. Nevada City has bad air and it's north of Hwy80. Many towns south of HWY 50 on the 49 corridor fail with a F score. As said,"Check it out for yourself".
California - American Lung Association | State of the Air 2015
Yosemite Valley and Seqouia NP both have terrible air and they are south of Hwy 50.
These National Parks Got an "F" in Air Pollution | Mother Jones
Read this 1996 report to better understand Sierra Nevada air.
http://pubs.usgs.gov/dds/dds-43/VOL_II/VII_C48.PDF
They don't have monitoring stations at every canyon or mountain side in a 1,500 square mile rural county. How on earth can they accurately gauge anything? For instance it shows Mariposa County having an "F" rating with 30 orange days in that particular year why adjacent Tuolumne County with a larger population and almost identical topography gets a "C" with only five days. Both border the San Joaquin Valley (Tuolumne NE of Modesto and Mariposa NE of Merced - 1/3 the size of Modesto). Both have identical topography and climate. It makes no sense and regardless, pollution doesn't respect arbitrary county lines - there are bound to be areas of Tuolumne that are worse than Mariposa (and visa versa). That grading system is stupid anyway. My county (Butte) gets an F having 13 orange days during that monitoring year. Tulare County gets the same F even though they have 233 orange days and 10 red days. Colusa and Glenn Counties gets an A never mind they're in the Sacramento Valley adjacent to Butte County with its F rating. Does the pollution suddenly stop at some invisible wall in a rice paddy west of Gridley?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2016, 09:53 AM
 
Location: Carpinteria
1,199 posts, read 1,647,718 times
Reputation: 1184
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeauCharles View Post
They don't have monitoring stations at every canyon or mountain side in a 1,500 square mile rural county. How on earth can they accurately gauge anything? For instance it shows Mariposa County having an "F" rating with 30 orange days in that particular year why adjacent Tuolumne County with a larger population and almost identical topography gets a "C" with only five days. Both border the San Joaquin Valley (Tuolumne NE of Modesto and Mariposa NE of Merced - 1/3 the size of Modesto). Both have identical topography and climate. It makes no sense and regardless, pollution doesn't respect arbitrary county lines - there are bound to be areas of Tuolumne that are worse than Mariposa (and visa versa). That grading system is stupid anyway. My county (Butte) gets an F having 13 orange days during that monitoring year. Tulare County gets the same F even though they have 233 orange days and 10 red days. Colusa and Glenn Counties gets an A never mind they're in the Sacramento Valley adjacent to Butte County with its F rating. Does the pollution suddenly stop at some invisible wall in a rice paddy west of Gridley?
Debate the merits of these reports with the powers that be, I just post them.
AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION, 55 W WACKER DRIVE, SUITE 1150, CHICAGO, IL 60601 T: 1-800-LUNGUSA | CONTACT
and you might get answers to your questions here. Folks there are paid to help you.
Air Resources Board - Homepage
good luck!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2016, 10:40 PM
 
Location: Shingle Springs, CA
534 posts, read 1,532,500 times
Reputation: 669
Air quality has to do with wind patterns, often. The Sierra Nevada foothills off highways 50 and 80 often have poor air quality ratings because the smog is being blown in from the Bay Area and gets trapped up at the foothill level.

Also, people up here love to burn tree trimmings and trash, which contributes to poor air quality. A lot of people are low-income and use wood stoves to heat their homes, too.

Down in the Central Valley, there are a lot of dairies (cow poop in the air) and farming (tilling stirring up dust) and so air quality can be bad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:24 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top