Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-08-2008, 11:10 PM
 
190 posts, read 848,987 times
Reputation: 75

Advertisements

Are there ANY reasonably-sized (pop. 50,000-100,000) cities on California's coast that are free of these^%$#earthquakes??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-08-2008, 11:20 PM
 
2,769 posts, read 7,235,498 times
Reputation: 1487
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeyT View Post
Are there ANY reasonably-sized (pop. 50,000-100,000) cities on California's coast that are free of these^%$#earthquakes??
There is no city that someone can guarantee you won't feel an earthquake at one point or another. Nor is there really any city in the world where you can guarantee no sort of natural disaster will happen.

If you want to live in California you accept that there might be an earthquake, that's reality. Despite this reality though you'll find plenty of Californians are choosing to control their lives, rather than letting fear of earthquakes control it instead.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2008, 11:28 PM
 
190 posts, read 848,987 times
Reputation: 75
I'd just like to be as worry-free as possible. If not Cali, then I'll head up to Oregon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2008, 11:30 PM
 
1,687 posts, read 6,073,729 times
Reputation: 830
Along the coast, no.

If you want to live in California and not worry about earthquakes you live in the Central Valley or the west side of the Sierras.
http://www.seismic.ca.gov/images/ca_earthquakes_map.jpg

But the reality is that it is one of the risks of life, just like hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, etc. elsewhere.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2008, 11:31 PM
 
Location: I'm around town...
764 posts, read 2,037,178 times
Reputation: 981
No, but there aren't many fatalities related to earthquakes, thanks to modern engineering practices. Many more US citizens dies in other types of natural disasters every year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2008, 12:00 AM
 
Location: McKinleyville, California
6,414 posts, read 10,492,645 times
Reputation: 4305
Oregon and Washington are also prone to large earthquakes. Starting at Shelter cove here in Humboldt county, the San Andreas fault ends and the plates switch from strike and slip to a subduction zone. I have been here since 1992 and we have had 3 or more earthquakes between 6.9 and 7.2. Geologists believe that around 1700 the west coast from northern California to Washington experienced a major earthquake similar to the one the hit Indonesia that killed more than 250,000 people. We are talking about an 8.5 to 9.0 or greater. Pretty much the entire west coast of the Americas are earthquake zones.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2008, 12:01 AM
 
190 posts, read 848,987 times
Reputation: 75
See, EQ's are maddening in that they catch you off guard. And who wants to be caught off guard when an 8. hits??? I have a jumpy heart :>( It can't be controlled w/ meds, and I'm high-strung & hyper-sensitive anyways. (double :>(
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2008, 12:02 AM
 
Location: Southern California
15,080 posts, read 20,474,184 times
Reputation: 10343
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeyT View Post
Are there ANY reasonably-sized (pop. 50,000-100,000) cities on California's coast that are free of these^%$#earthquakes??
No.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2008, 07:23 AM
 
550 posts, read 1,234,754 times
Reputation: 125
Oregon, Washington and British Columbia are all going to be hit by a major quake and tsunami before Cali gets one. Cities in BC are going to be completely destroyed as the land liquefies. Many BC cities sit on top of a aquifer. So since you're willing to risk dying in quake you might as well die enjoying nice weather year round, thus select a city in cali to live in.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2008, 10:12 AM
 
190 posts, read 848,987 times
Reputation: 75
nahh! After what you said I'm giving up the Pacific coast entirely, much as I love it. Just not worth the headache. A lot like living on death row for 20 years knowing that one day in the future I'm gonna die under a pile of concrete.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:58 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top