U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which part of California is more Californian?
They're both Californian 112 70.44%
Northern is more real Californian 16 10.06%
Southern is more real Californian - Hollywood, like duh! 31 19.50%
Voters: 159. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Old 09-09-2008, 04:11 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
1,372 posts, read 2,594,953 times
Reputation: 573

Advertisements

Southern California is probably people's idea of California more, but I think nowhere is as truly Californian as the Bay Area, of course being a San Francisco native and growing up in the suburbs I'm biased, but after all, San Francisco was where the Gold Rush wealth went, and Southern California arguably has more history in common with Arizona and New Mexico as it didn't really become Americanized until the early 1900s.
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-09-2008, 04:16 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
15,460 posts, read 25,401,064 times
Reputation: 8931
I'm a Bay Area native who has been living in Southern CA for the last 7 years and they are both the REAL California. The state wouldn't be what it is w/o the other. SoCal is a little more the OUTSIDERS stereotypical image of CA with Hollywood, the sun, palm trees, weather, beaches, surfers, etc.. But Northern CA with SF, the GG Bridge, Lake Tahoe, Redwood Forests, Wine County, etc...are just as much as part of the CA landscape and lifestyle as much as the characteristics of SoCal. It's too bad some people in this state are so biased b/c each part has good and bad points and they both make CA what it is.

Also you need to learn your history a little better if you think Southern CA didn't become "Americanized" until the 1900's.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2008, 04:27 PM
 
8,270 posts, read 26,323,916 times
Reputation: 4407
They are both the real California... but someone from Norcal will say otherwise... *runs, ducks*
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2008, 04:37 PM
 
2,765 posts, read 6,508,852 times
Reputation: 1448
I don't like to divide them, yes they are both different, but that's what's so great about California. It offers a wide variety of scenery, climate, culture, etc.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2008, 06:00 PM
 
Location: San Jose, CA
7,688 posts, read 25,670,951 times
Reputation: 3558
I've lived in Northern California all my life.. they're both the real California, whatever that means. Often imitated but never duplicated.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2008, 06:08 PM
 
11,715 posts, read 35,948,362 times
Reputation: 7512
It depends on what aspect of California you consider real. SoCal has more sunny weather, smog, crowds, and Hollywood. Northern California has more Birkenstock wearing granola eaters.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2008, 06:08 PM
 
Location: Zurich, Switzerland/ Piedmont, CA
32,341 posts, read 55,131,075 times
Reputation: 15407
They are both the real California.

Our state is too diverse and multidimentional to be defined by just one area. Heck even with SoCal and NorCal, there are several distinct subregions.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2008, 11:16 AM
 
Location: CA
3,469 posts, read 7,146,575 times
Reputation: 4789
And the question shows no bias - like, duh!

I think the diversity and variety is what makes Cali. There are even big differences between all the counties in SoCal.
I grew up in SoCal, but some of my best childhood memories are from the trips we took to central coast, and it still felt like Cali to me.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2008, 02:03 PM
 
Location: West LA
2,318 posts, read 7,006,404 times
Reputation: 1097
All of California is the "real" California...
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-10-2008, 03:15 PM
 
1,687 posts, read 5,378,776 times
Reputation: 815
I think all of California is the real California.

But back in 1991, Time Magazine called Fresno "The Last Real California".
Close-Up: Two Boom Towns Fresno the Last Real California - TIME
The way Time put it was "If loopy optimism and defiance of the odds are what made this state in the first place, then un-Californian Fresno may be the last real California left."

I don't know if I would say that Fresno is the last "real California". I think it exists elsewhere in the state too.

But "loopy optimism and defiance of the odds"? Yep that is a pretty good view of what made California. If we ever lose that then California is really in trouble.
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Options
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2016 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top