Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-03-2007, 12:12 PM
 
Location: Tampa
3,982 posts, read 10,461,528 times
Reputation: 1200

Advertisements

seems to me that they could bring down the cost of housing if they stopped doing single family homes and everything went tower from now on.

why not?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-03-2007, 12:13 PM
 
11,715 posts, read 40,449,173 times
Reputation: 7586
Quote:
Originally Posted by crystalblue View Post
seems to me that they could bring down the cost of housing if they stopped doing single family homes and everything went tower from now on.

why not?
Because most middle class people with kids don't want to live in a concrete box.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2007, 12:37 PM
 
Location: Tampa
3,982 posts, read 10,461,528 times
Reputation: 1200
but most Californians also cant seem to afford a stand alone house...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2007, 12:48 PM
 
11,715 posts, read 40,449,173 times
Reputation: 7586
Quote:
Originally Posted by crystalblue View Post
but most Californians also cant seem to afford a stand alone house...
And that's why we're leaving. I'd rather have an actual house with a back yard in Texas or Colorado than a concrete cell in the sky sharing 4 of the 6 walls with others in California.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2007, 01:45 PM
 
491 posts, read 2,290,504 times
Reputation: 541
Quote:
seems to me that they could bring down the cost of housing if they stopped doing single family homes and everything went tower from now on.

why not?
Because we're not a totalitarian dictatorship, that's why not in a nutshell.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2007, 02:23 PM
 
6 posts, read 43,437 times
Reputation: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by crystalblue View Post
but most Californians also cant seem to afford a stand alone house...
The unaffordable places are what most Californians desire because it's "what everyone else wants" and/or it's what everyone else HAS.

If you can't see the ocean, they don't want to live there. If the house isn't 4000+ square feet, they couldn't possibly contemplate living there.

Most Californians desire what they DO NOT HAVE, they desire what Joe Blow down the street has instead of focusing and building on what they DO HAVE.

Do you think the prices of houses in Malibu are reasonable?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2007, 02:27 PM
 
9,525 posts, read 30,475,285 times
Reputation: 6435
While High-rises are going to be more commonplace in CA, they will be limited to the downtown areas and the luxury market. Builders of these properties are not aiming for the middle-class.

What will become more common is infill townhomes in central urban areas (workforce housing), increased mixed-use commercial/residential density on established commercial thoroughfares, and of course continued suburban tract sprawl on any bit of vacant dirt far they can find.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2007, 02:54 PM
 
Location: Tampa
3,982 posts, read 10,461,528 times
Reputation: 1200
well, one of the reasons i ask is your expecting about 12 million MORE people (less now) by 2030.

where are they all going to go?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-03-2007, 03:14 PM
 
11,715 posts, read 40,449,173 times
Reputation: 7586
Quote:
Originally Posted by crystalblue View Post
well, one of the reasons i ask is your expecting about 12 million MORE people (less now) by 2030.

where are they all going to go?
A good chunk of that 12 million more people will be illegals living in converted garages and backyard storage sheds. There's plenty of room if you pack enough people into what was a single family home. California has a net loss of population to other states. Most Americans can't afford to live the high life here and refuse to live like an illegal. So they're moving out of state or not coming here to begin with.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:39 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top