Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Canada
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-29-2014, 01:35 PM
 
Location: Canada
14,735 posts, read 15,038,045 times
Reputation: 34871

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Magnatomicflux View Post

I prefer a land line.

Plus...I don't have a cell. lol
Same here. Aside from the fact that I have no need nor want of a cell phone, the cell phone expenses are more than twice as much as a land line.

.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-29-2014, 01:39 PM
 
Location: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
11,222 posts, read 16,428,441 times
Reputation: 13536
Yep. While it would be convenient to have, I just don't really want one. I like being able to be disconnected from everyone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2014, 01:41 PM
 
Location: Vancouver
18,504 posts, read 15,555,283 times
Reputation: 11937
Quote:
Originally Posted by smihaila View Post
How are the voip-based lines factored into those stats, heh?
They are considered "land lines" but in the same time more mobile and flexible - using the power of Internet instead of dedicated copper wire loops to the closest central office.

Also, the fact that the mobile carriers in Canada are much of an oligopoly and not too much competition on the market price-wise, is a factor.
VOIP are not landlines.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2014, 01:45 PM
 
Location: Vancouver
18,504 posts, read 15,555,283 times
Reputation: 11937
Quote:
Originally Posted by PacoMartin View Post
I can't find any hard statistics, but everything I read says TELCO's are getting out of DSL business. They are turning it over to cable companies.

I suspect that it is simply that the price is still lower in Canada for international calls.

In Mexico the mobile phone has become king in the last 13 years. Worldwide, the number of mobile subscriptions is passing the entire population of the world (including children).

Mexico wired - mobile
2000 12,331,676 14,077,880
2001 13,774,146 21,757,559
2002 14,975,085 25,928,266
2003 16,330,066 30,097,700
2004 18,073,238 38,451,135
2005 19,512,024 47,128,746
2006 19,861,299 55,395,461
2007 19,997,903 66,559,462
2008 20,491,430 75,303,469
2009 19,505,573 83,193,574
2010 19,918,643 91,383,493
2011 19,731,368 94,583,253
2012 20,587,824 100,727,228
2013 20,590,449 105,005,729

Mexico only circulates the equivalent of US$500 per person in currency and coin. It is very difficult to get change outside of major places of business, because people open up in the morning with only a few dollars in their cash machine. Surprisingly Mexico would benefit from electronic currency transferred via cell phone much more than US or Canada.

Value of currency and coin (per capita) expressed in US dollars
$8,947 Japan
$7,878 Switzerland
$4,897 Hong Kong
$4,063 Singapore
$3,452 USA
$2,710 Australia
$2,056 Denmark
$1,897 Canada
$1,771 Norway
$1,527 Sweden
$1,499 Russia
$1,448 United Kingdom
$1,313 Saudi
$845 Korea
$502 Mexico
$445 Brazil
$394 Turkey
$268 South Africa
$167 India
- source Sweden's Riksbank study for 2011 of how people make payments.

The statistic for USA does not come as a big shock as it is known that USA is circulating a trillion dollars in c-notes (75% overseas). But many Canadians are surprised to know that their government is still circulating ten $100 banknotes for every man woman and child in the country.

Not included in the above study was the Euro Zone which is over US$4000 per capita.
Since this study was done, Sweden has destroyed most of their 1000 kroner banknotes, as part of their drive to eliminate most uses of currency and their figure is now below Saudi Arabia.
Where did you read that? I used to work for a telco and if anything they are moving more and more to fibre,(in larger centres ) but they aren't handing ANYTHING over to the competition. That just doesn't make sense. (also cable doesn't use DSL, so if you're implying that telco's are handing over internet service to cable companies, then you are just plain wrong ) Service offerings, the line between cable companies and telco's has been blurred since cable offers VOIP and telco's offer cable like service with products like Telus's OPTIK TV which is delivered over DSL and fibre in some cases.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2014, 02:31 PM
 
14,611 posts, read 17,562,480 times
Reputation: 7783
Quote:
Originally Posted by Natnasci View Post
Where did you read that? I used to work for a telco and if anything they are moving more and more to fibre,
Verizon is Willfully Driving DSL Users Into the Arms of Cable
Verizon is Willfully Driving DSL Users Into the Arms of Cable - Verizon's Plan: Kill DSL, Kill Unionized Labor, Raise Prices | DSLReports, ISP Information

I was talking about the USA. Perhaps the situtation is different in Canada

Quote:
Originally Posted by Natnasci View Post
VOIP are not landlines.
I should have said wired lines.

But there are different kinds of VOIP. My cable company has VOIP, but it's not the same VOIP if you were buying Vonage. They have a dedicated network.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2014, 03:09 PM
 
Location: Vancouver
18,504 posts, read 15,555,283 times
Reputation: 11937
Quote:
Originally Posted by PacoMartin View Post
Verizon is Willfully Driving DSL Users Into the Arms of Cable
Verizon is Willfully Driving DSL Users Into the Arms of Cable - Verizon's Plan: Kill DSL, Kill Unionized Labor, Raise Prices | DSLReports, ISP Information

I was talking about the USA. Perhaps the situtation is different in Canada


I should have said wired lines.

But there are different kinds of VOIP. My cable company has VOIP, but it's not the same VOIP if you were buying Vonage. They have a dedicated network.
Yes, the situation it very different in Canada. Some of their tactics sounds like it would go against the regulations here mandated by the CRTC.

For example, incumbent Telco's by law have to provide certain services in certain areas, especially in areas where they are they only choice, mainly rural. So they just can't abandon customers in a lot of cases.

My comment about VOIP was not to you but in answer to this

"Originally Posted by smihaila View Post
How are the voip-based lines factored into those stats, heh?
They are considered "land lines" but in the same time more mobile and flexible - using the power of Internet instead of dedicated copper wire loops to the closest central office."

Voice Over Internet Protocol is Voice Over Internet Protocol no matter how you slice it. Different companies just offer different hardware in using it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2014, 05:07 PM
 
Location: Montreal, Quebec
15,080 posts, read 14,324,813 times
Reputation: 9789
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magnatomicflux View Post
I prefer a land line.

Plus...I don't have a cell. lol
Neither do !! I don't want to be available to everyone, all the time. I used to have a cell phone, and kept hearing "Why didn't you pick up?? Why have a cell if you don't pick up??"
Maybe I didn't feel like talking to you.
Besides, they're addicting as hell. I know folks who lost theirs and went into withdrawal.
I was at the Jazz Fest the other day, and everyone was busy recording the shows on their cells. Nobody actually watched the show. Nobody enjoyed being in the moment. Everyone scrambling to get a better shot.
It was kind of sad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2014, 05:26 PM
 
5 posts, read 9,436 times
Reputation: 16
I have no landline and haven't for a while now. With that being said, I get solid cell reception at my home so I have no need for one. Unlimited calling anywhere in Canada (versus landlines around here only offering local calls). I can take my phone (and number) anywhere I go, as well as SMS and data. No need for a landline in my situation - of course others have their reasons for having one and that's completely reasonable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2014, 06:28 PM
 
14,611 posts, read 17,562,480 times
Reputation: 7783
Quote:
Originally Posted by Natnasci View Post
"Originally Posted by smihaila
How are the voip-based lines factored into those stats, heh?
They are considered "land lines" but in the same time more mobile and flexible - using the power of Internet instead of dedicated copper wire loops to the closest central office."

Voice Over Internet Protocol is Voice Over Internet Protocol no matter how you slice it. Different companies just offer different hardware in using it.
I did find one reference.
US wireline
2010 149,652,000
2011 143,319,000
....
2012 138,072,000
2013 135,141,000


In June 2012, there were
102 million end-user switched access lines in service, +
39 million interconnected VoIP subscriptions, =
141 million wireline retail local telephone service connections

Of the 141 million there were 81 million residential connections and 60 million were business connections.

Reference http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Rele...C-321568A1.pdf


Breaking down the 102 million end-user switched access lines in service by technology
ILEC== incumbent local exchange carriers
FTTP == Fiber to the Premises : A network access architecture in which optical fiber is deployed all the way to the customer’s premises (home).
Terrestrial Fixed Wireless == Exactly like Cell phone but not mobile.


Technology ILEC Non-ILEC Total
FTTP 5,800 + 1,982 = 7,782
Coaxial Cable 173 + 1,744 = 1,917
Terrestrial Fixed Wireless 3 + 63 = 65
Copper Local Loop 74,061 + 18,008= 92,069
Total 80,037 + 21,796 =101,833
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-16-2014, 12:34 PM
 
Location: Murrieta California
3,038 posts, read 4,776,406 times
Reputation: 2315
Quote:
Originally Posted by marc3565 View Post
Some parts of Canada have crappy cell reception..
AND.. canadian cell carriers are a lot more expensive. A US person with the right plan can get by entirely without a Cell. A Canadian might opt to keep the land line as doing everything on the cell would be quite expensive
Our son and his wife haven't had a land line phone in 10 years. They both have cell smart phones.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > Canada

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:29 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top